Posted on 11/16/2025 5:07:46 AM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
What’s the allure of false teaching, particularly in regard to future things? Why do so many people go astray from what the words of Scripture tell us about what lies ahead for us and the world?
These questions again came to my mind after I received an email boasting that “dispensationalism is on the decline.” By that, the writer meant that many Christians are turning away from our belief in Jesus’ thousand-year rule on the earth. As evidence, he cited Kirk Cameron’s apparent switch from belief in a pre-Tribulation Rapture to Dominion Theology, which teaches that the church will usher in millennial conditions on Earth before Jesus returns to the earth.
As I thought about the email heralding the merits of Dominion Theology, I began to see a pattern of what made it appealing to the writer and thus to many other Christians.
It’s Popular
I responded to the email by asserting that our beliefs are not a matter of what’s popular, but they must find their basis in the words of Scripture. Sadly, a great many churches adhere to the belief that world conditions will get better, not worse. This viewpoint stems from the errant teaching that God has rejected Israel and the church is now God’s physical kingdom on Earth. Dominion Theology takes this a step further by asserting that it, not Jesus, will bring kingdom conditions to the nations.
They also claim that the antichrist is not a person but rather a spirit that the church will defeat.
Such teachings do not match the words of Scripture, not at all. Paul referred to the antichrist as the “man of lawlessness” (2 Thessalonians 2:3) and distinguished this person from the “mystery of lawlessness” that was already at work in the world in his day. He also revealed that the Lord would “kill” him at “his coming” (2:7-8). The Lord will end the antichrist’s reign of terror, not the church.
Jesus warned His disciples that the world would “hate” them (John 15:18-25); He never promised that they or the church would win the world over to their side. The Lord told us to expect persecution.
Human Wisdom and Experience Fueled by Emotion
When it comes to alternative beliefs regarding future things, human wisdom and experience play a significant role. The email I received mentioned a book, Victorious Eschatology. In the book’s description on Amazon, the author referred to his experiences that led to his passionate belief that the church would triumph over all the world’s ills.
Unfortunately, human wisdom and experience fueled by emotion lead many astray from the truth of God’s word. I remember watching a video of an author who described his encounter with God that led him to believe that everyone would someday receive eternal life, regardless of what they believe. Sadly, his persuasive and passionate presentation likely appealed to many Christians who lack a basic understanding of the Bible.
Is it not the same with cults and false religions? They start with someone claiming to have an encounter with God through which they received special revelation that negates the clear teachings of God’s Word.
My belief in Jesus’ imminent appearing is deeply personal. I can relate several stories, some emotionally charged, of how the Lord used my beliefs to comfort and encourage me in the darkest of times. However, that is most definitely not why I’m convinced Jesus is coming to take us to glory before the start of the Tribulation. I believe what I do about the Rapture because the words of the Bible support my eager anticipation of His appearing.
It’s New
It’s insanely ironic, is it not? Many of the same people who vilify the Rapture as a belief that no one held before John Darby in the 1800s promote Dominion Theology because . . . it is new. Yes, they do!
Based upon new revelation supposedly given to newly appointed apostles and prophets, its adherents cling to the hope that the church will usher in kingdom conditions on the earth. Even the name of this teaching, New Apostolic Reformation (NAR), emphasizes the recent nature of this theology.
However, its beliefs are not fresh. They represent a rehabilitated postmillennialism that flourished in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The two world wars put an end to its teaching that the church would bring kingdom conditions of peace and righteousness to the world.
Identifying the church as God’s physical kingdom on Earth goes all the way back to Augustine, who popularized this idea in the fifth century. Dominion Theology is but a different wrinkle to the Dark Ages’ belief that God had called the church to physically rule over the nations.
Lack of Sound Biblical Teaching on Eschatology
False teachings, particularly in regard to eschatology (the doctrine of future things), flourish today because of a lack of sound biblical teaching. Most pastors either ignore Bible prophecy or teach that the church is God’s promised kingdom on the earth (or will be).
We base our hope of eternal life on the words of the New Testament. The same must be true of what we believe about the Rapture, the Tribulation, Jesus’ return, and His reign over the nations. The words of Revelation 19:11-20:10 dispel all the NAR beliefs as well as its basis in Replacement Theology. These teachings rely on human-based interpretations of the book of Revelation rather than what the Apostle John plainly tells us about Jesus’ Second Coming, when He brings His kingdom to earth.
When we let the words of Scripture speak for themselves, they lead us to a belief in the pre-Tribulation Rapture. Our hope does not rest on human wisdom or experience but rather on what the Bible says.
End Times Ping
Please FReemail me if you wish to be added to or removed from The End Times Ping List.
Maranatha!
2 Timothy 4:8
Finally, there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will give to me on that Day, and not to me only but also to all who have loved His appearing.
Believing in the Rapture for one. Believing that Jesus’ return is imminent is another. These are both false teachings. The word Rapture never appears in the Bible. Jesus’ return has been imminent since he left for Heaven 2000 years ago.
This ^
People get to choose what they believe. Those who dictate what people must believe are usually wrong. One surety is that God will make sure everyone gets the memo and then gets the opportunity to do something about it. One way or the other.
So the church was following false teachers until Poiret, Scofield, and Darby set the record straight in the 17th, 18th and 19th century?
“The word Rapture never appears in the Bible.”
It is in the Latin Vulgate. “17 Deinde nos, qui vivimus, qui relinquimur, simul RAPIEMUR cum illis in nubibus obviam Christo in aera, et sic semper cum Domino erimus.
Nor does the word "Bible"
Nor "Trinity"
Nor so much more.
God has always had His people who taught the Gospel of Grace and understood the Scriptures. Even among the Church fathers.
Thank you!
Dispensational heretics yammering about “false teaching” is rich.
I'm guessing that you believe that those who sin are not saved. If so, how do you understand 1 John 2:1 that says: "My dear children, I am writing this to you so that you will not sin. But if anyone does sin, we have an advocate who pleads our case before the Father. He is Jesus Christ, the one who is truly righteous."
My faith is in Christ but I'd be a liar if I professed that I never sin. My sins, past, present and to come were nailed to a tree 2000 years ago. My hope is not in me being sinless; my hope is in the sinless lamb who takes away the sin of the world.
“It is good to be the King.”
Then you get to order people to believe whatever you want.
Truth or falsity has nothing to do with it.
It is in the Latin Vulgate. “17 Deinde nos, qui vivimus, qui relinquimur, simul RAPIEMUR cum illis in nubibus obviam Christo in aera, et sic semper cum Domino erimus.
And there, seems to me, is a problem. When people refer to "The Bible", which "The Bible" are they referring to? All the Bibles I've seen say, in the front matter, that they are a version and/or a translation. Is there a collection of works in the original languages that could be deemed "The Bible"?
A pertinent question, which it would be most interesting to read a reply by Roman_War_Criminal as original poster of the article.
On the more skeptical side of things, clicking on the link brought me to the following text:
"This is the final donation drive of 2025, and it has been an extraordinary year. Just as a timing belt regulates the function of an engine, the soon-coming rapture is steering world events. Despite the looming threat of collapse due to economic and moral excesses, life goes on with little awareness of the potential consequences."In an even more sketpcial side of things, the referral to this article by Jonathan Brentner is interesting, because he has his own website, and his work appears in a number of other sites.
"Brentner mentions 'English Bible commentator Joseph Mede (1586–1639)"' and 'During the 1740s, another Bible commentator, John Gill'...."Jonathan Brentner Our Journey Home
The slander on Calvinism was uncalled for. That’s not what Calvin taught, and not what modern Calvinists believe.
The Hebrew and Greek are available on the e-sword. Go straight to the source.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.