Posted on 03/31/2025 5:22:54 AM PDT by metmom
“‘Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill’” (Matthew 5:17).
The ceremonial law governed the form of Israel’s worship. When Jesus died on the cross, He fulfilled that law as well as the judicial. Sacrifice was the heart of all Old Testament worship, and as the perfect sacrifice, Jesus brought all the other sacrifices to an end. While He was on the cross, “the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom” (Matt. 27:51). Christ Himself became the new and perfect way into the Holy of Holies, into which any man could come by faith.
In this way, the Levitical, priestly, sacrificial system ended. Though the temple was not destroyed until A.D. 70, every offering made on its altar after Jesus died was needless. Symbolically, they had no more significance. Of course, the Tabernacle and Temple sacrifices that were offered even before Christ’s death never had power to cleanse from sin. They were only pictures of the Messiah-Savior’s work of cleansing, pictures that pointed to that supreme manifestation of God’s mercy and grace.
The ceremonial law ended because it was fulfilled. Since the reality had come, the pictures and symbols had no more place or purpose. From Genesis 1:1 through Malachi 4:6, the Old Testament is Jesus Christ. It was inspired by Christ, it points to Christ, and it is fulfilled by Christ.
Ask Yourself
What does the magnificence of God’s story stir in you as you consider it again—the signs and fulfillments created by God’s design before the foundation of the world and forged through long centuries of human history? Sit at His feet again today in awe-filled worship.
From Daily Readings from the Life of Christ, Vol. 1, John MacArthur. Copyright © 2008. Used by permission of Moody Publishers, Chicago, IL 60610, www.moodypublishers.com.
Studying God’s Word ping
He should be here soon. Thank God.
From your lips to God’s ears.
Are the 10 commandments included in the ceremonial law? Let’s discuss.
No, let’s not because this is a caucus/devotional thread and you need to familiarize yourself with the Religion Forum Guidelines set forth by the Religion Moderator and found on his homepage.
******************************************************************
Religion Moderator
Religion Forum threads labeled “Devotional: ”Devotional threads are closed to debate of any kind.
https://freerepublic.com/~religionmoderator/
Religion Forum threads labeled “Caucus”
Caucus threads are closed to any poster who is not currently and actively a member of the caucus group.
For instance, if it says “Catholic Caucus” and you are not currently, actively Catholic, then do not post to the thread. However, if the poster of the caucus invites you, I will not boot you from the thread.
The “caucus” article and posts must not compare beliefs or speak in behalf of a belief outside the caucus.
There is little to no tolerance for non-members of a caucus coming onto the caucus thread to challenge whether or not it should be a caucus. Gross disruption usually follows.
If you question whether the article is appropriate for a caucus designation, send me a Freepmail. I’ll get to it as soon as I can.
Caucus Designations, Generally
Caucus labels exist only for the purpose of avoiding unwanted disruptions on Religion Forum threads. The terms used in a caucus label are not necessarily precise with reference to Canon Law, theology or even dictionaries – but are intended to communicate briefly who should or should not post on a thread. A reply post may be removed from a caucus thread if the moderator recognizes the poster as a non-member.
If you believe a poster is not a member of the caucus, or if you believe the article or reply posts are mentioning the beliefs of non-members of the caucus then let me know by Freepmail and I will follow-up as soon as possible.
Do not disturb the caucus.
“Though the temple was not destroyed until A.D. 70, every offering made on its altar after Jesus died was needless. Symbolically, they had no more significance. Of course, the Tabernacle and Temple sacrifices that were offered even before Christ’s death never had power to cleanse from sin. They were only pictures of the Messiah-Savior’s work of cleansing, pictures that pointed to that supreme manifestation of God’s mercy and grace.”
Interestingly, MacArthur describes sacrifices in the temple after Christ’s death as “needless” and not idolatrous or sinful. Even Jews who had not yet believed on Christ were still worshipping the true God. Jesus had said, “We [i.e. Jews] know who we worship,” in John 4. There He also spoke of a future time when true worship would no longer be dependent on the temple.
It is one of the profound truths of the New Testament that former sacrifices never took away sin and were only forward-looking to the perfect sacrifice of the Lamb of God. And the author of Hebrews warned of the danger of abandoning Christ to return (and be accepted within) their former religion.
Yet the apostles continued to participate in the temple traditions until it was destroyed. Wouldn’t sacrifices in this case serve to commemorate the sacrifice of Christ? Isn’t this similar to the Lord’s Supper / Communion which was originally part of a Passover observation at the Last Supper?
I inquired further into John MacArthur’s position on this. I use his study Bible but there is a lot more online, and I found this:
https://www.gty.org/library/sermons-library/1784/pauls-arrest-part-1-the-measure-of-humility
He seems to take the position (though this was written many years ago and his views could have shifted some) that God saw Jewish “Christians” continuing to practice Judaism as harmless, and He was gradually weening them off of this system, leading up to the 70 AD temple destruction.
I believe that God intended for Jewish and Gentile believers to coexist in the Church but for Jews to continue their Judaic duties. Temple sacrifices and many things associated with the temple ceased within Judaism when the temple was destroyed. So, this impacted all Jews, not just “Christian” Jews.
One thing is clear. No sacrifices before or after the crucifixion took away sin. Only Christ’s did. Jewish believers, including the apostles, who continued to participate in temple worship, knew this very well. So, I would consider their sacrifices to be commemorative or illustrative of Christ’s sacrifice rather than a denial of it.
Jewish believers gradually became excluded from traditional Judaism throughout the world. By the time the temple was destroyed, Christianity (as it’s called today) was no longer a sect of Judaism but an entirely different faith. This continues to this day. But many modern Christians expect, along with religious Jews, for the temple to be rebuilt and the sacrifices restored. This is part of the signs leading up to the second coming of Christ. Considering that even the apostles participated in temple worship after Christ’s sacrifice, I think the restoration of these sacrifices is not wrong, evil, or harmful. It is part of God’s plan. But, of course, the future sacrifices will also not take away sin.
No, for then the SDAs and others will pop in and mess up the caucus label.
>>No, for then the SDAs and others will pop in and mess up the caucus label..>>>
Got it, thanks.
The sacrifices of bulls and other animals were a shadow or a type of the real sacrifice of The Son on a cross. That was the only reason they had efficacy before Calvary.
Yes. Very relevant to today’s devotional.
“So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.”
It’s interesting how the author of Hebrews ties a proper view of the Law of Moses to an expectancy of Christ’s second coming.
I believe God will bring Israel to national repentance and the remnant of Israel will be fully and finally restored to God at the return of Christ. If my understanding is correct, this is when “all Israel shall be saved”. See Romans 11:26. I think of it as similar to Paul’s (formerly Saul) conversion experience on the road to Damascus where he saw Christ. See Acts 9:1-6.
Zechariah 12:10 NKJV
And I will pour on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem the Spirit of grace and supplication; then they will look on Me whom they pierced. Yes, they will mourn for Him as one mourns for his only son, and grieve for Him as one grieves for a firstborn.
Revelation 1:7 NKJV
Behold, He is coming with clouds, and every eye will see Him, even they who pierced Him. And all the tribes of the earth will mourn because of Him. Even so, Amen.
So, in relation to the devotional topic, the destruction of the temple ended the sacrifices. But if the temple is rebuilt, the sacrifices will return also. But these sacrifices cannot take away sin. And Israel will not be saved as a nation until they come to a complete understanding of the meaning of their temple worship.
The feast of trumpets (Rosh Hashanah) symbolizes Christ’s return. As the start of the Jewish New Year, it is meant to be a time of reflection on the past and contemplating the future. It begins with the blowing of a shofar trumpet as a call to repentance.
Ten days later is Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement). This is considered the holiest day of the year, a day of fasting and prayer for forgiveness and atonement for sins. It’s a time of introspection and seeking reconciliation with God and others.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.