Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Catholic Caucus] EXCLUSIVE: Archbishop Viganò confirms he will not attend Vatican ‘schism’ trial
LifeSite News ^ | June 21, 2024 | Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò

Posted on 06/21/2024 5:21:53 PM PDT by ebb tide

[Catholic Caucus] EXCLUSIVE: Archbishop Viganò confirms he will not attend Vatican ‘schism’ trial

'I therefore wish to make it clear that I did not go to the Vatican yesterday, and that I have no intention of going to the Holy Office on June 28, and that I have not delivered any statement or document in my defense to the Dicastery, whose authority I do not recognize,' Viganò wrote.

The following is a statement sent exclusively to LifeSiteNews by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò on Friday, June 21, 2024.

(LifeSiteNews) — The reports spread by certain media outlets, stating that I presented myself yesterday, Thursday, June 20, at the Palace of the Holy Office, as intimated to me by the Decree of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, is devoid of any foundation. These reports are completely false. 

The Jesuit magazine America, the media arm of the Society of Jesus in the United States and the megaphone of the “church of mercy” of the Jesuit Bergoglio, has rushed ahead, while Vatican News (here) was still totally unaware of the Decree sent to me on June 11, only by a simple email, without respecting those formalities necessary for the validity of the communication of a Decree, and which I myself published on X two hours before the meeting scheduled at the Dicastery. Although all the elements were clearly stated in my communiqué, inferences and speculations took precedence, in typical Jesuit style.

Haste is a bad counselor. Therefore, Gerard O’Connell’s article Archbishop Viganò charged with schism by the Vatican that appeared yesterday at America (here) seems to have been written even before I made the Vatican document public. This reveals the close contiguity between the Vatican apparatus and America magazine and confirms a very precise strategy, aimed at liquidating my trial with a condemnation that has already been decided by Bergoglio and his zealous collaborator Tucho Fernández, author of the scandalous pornographic pamphlet La Pasion mistica: Espiritualidad y Sensualidad, as well as Saname con tu boca: El arte de besar. 

O’Connell writes: 

The decree says that it considered ‘superfluous’ the prior investigation in accordance with Canon 1717 that states, ‘Whenever an ordinary has knowledge, which at least seems true, of a delict, he is carefully to inquire personally or through another suitable person about the facts, circumstances, and imputability, unless such an inquiry seems entirely superfluous.’ This means that the evidence against him had already been collected by the dicastery and did not require fuller investigation. Much of it was already in the public domain.

As can be seen, “evidence” is considered superfluous, and the procedure is deliberately simplified in order to reach a conviction as soon as possible: 

America has learned that the decision to proceed with the extrajudicial penal trial would have been approved by the pope, since the accused is a bishop.

And that’s not all: the Jesuits of America are already giving indications about my procedural destiny: 

The extrajudicial penal trial is in accordance with Canon 1364 of the Code of Canon Law, which states: ‘An apostate from the faith, a heretic or a schismatic incurs a latæ sententiæ excommunication, without prejudice to the provision of can. 194’ and that ‘he or she may also be punished with the penalties mentioned in can. 1336 §§ 2-4.’ This means, among other things, that the excommunication would be declared publicly, and it would remain in force until the convicted person repents. That same Canon 1364 also states: ‘If a long-standing contempt or the gravity of scandal calls for it, other penalties may be added, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state.’

The juridical competence of America magazine, however, seems to have no place in the Vatican, where it has now become common to use extrajudicial trials and the direct interventions of the Argentine both to cover up the real culprits and to hastily condemn the innocent. Beyond the media hype, the former Cardinal McCarrick – who in a serious trial would have been made to compensate the victims of his crimes after the examination of testimonies that could have clarified many connivances – continued to work for Bergoglio in the United States and China, where the secret Sino-Vatican Agreement saw him directly involved. Marko Rupnik, S.J., thanks to the intervention of his protector, had his excommunication lifted. He was not even dismissed from the clerical state; on the contrary, he was welcomed and incardinated in a diocese in Slovenia. Evidently, criticizing the Council is considered a far more serious crime than those of McCarrick and Rupnik.

I therefore wish to make it clear that I did not go to the Vatican yesterday [June 20], and that I have no intention of going to the Holy Office on June 28, and that I have not delivered any statement or document in my defense to the Dicastery, whose authority I do not recognize, nor do I recognize the authority of its Prefect, nor do I recognize the authority of the one who appointed him. 

I have no intention of submitting myself to a show trial in which those who are supposed to judge me impartially in order to defend Catholic orthodoxy are at the same time those whom I accuse of heresy, treason, and abuse of power. And among them are precisely the Jesuits, the first proponents of all the moral and doctrinal deviations of the last sixty years, starting with James Martin, S.J., the LGBTQ+ activist who is a regular visitor at Santa Marta. 

America says: 

A canon lawyer (who wished to remain anonymous) who has read the archbishop’s defense statement, told America: ‘This is the major argument for the prosecution. His defense is a declaration of schism. It is the most egregious act of schism.’ He explained that the extrajudicial procedure envisaged usually does not take much time. If the archbishop is convicted, the pope would then have to confirm the penalties.

This anonymous “canon lawyer” considers my statement as a proof of my schismatic will: but the whole question concerns which is the “church” to which Bergoglio belongs and the de facto schism from the true Church that he has already accomplished over and over again with his declarations, with his acts of government, and with his most eloquent behavior of open hostility to all that is Catholic. Bergoglio’s “church” is not the Catholic Church, but rather that “conciliar church” born from Vatican Council II and recently rebranded with the no less heretical name of “synodal church.” If it is from this “church” that I am declared to be separated by schism, it will be for me a cause for honor and pride.

+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

June 21, 2024

S. Aloisii Gonzagæ Confessoris



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Current Events
KEYWORDS: apostatepope; frankenchurch; schism; vigano
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 06/21/2024 5:21:53 PM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

I am glad to hear this news.


2 posted on 06/21/2024 5:23:55 PM PDT by Dacula
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; kalee; markomalley; miele man; Mrs. Don-o; ...

Ping


3 posted on 06/21/2024 5:26:54 PM PDT by ebb tide (Why doesn't Bergoglio try Batizing and his fellow German heretics for schism and lack of "communion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

God bless you Cardinal Vigano....


4 posted on 06/21/2024 5:31:48 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Personally, I think he is making a mistake. As an ordained bishop, he took a vow of obedience.

In my opinion, he would be a better witness to the faith by acceeding to Papal Authority with humility, acknowleging his vow of Holy Obedince and trusting in God and His justice.

St Pio of Pietrelcina was prevented from saying Mass in public and other sanctions from his bishop. He was victim to terrible lies and slander. However, he was obedient to his bishop, even though he’d done nothing to warrant censure. The truth came out after his death, confirming his piety.

This is a frustrating time for believers. However, regardless of who sits in the chair of Peter, the truths of the Church remain immutable.


5 posted on 06/21/2024 6:17:01 PM PDT by SpirituTuo ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
“I concur.”


6 posted on 06/21/2024 6:27:36 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (Either ‘the Deep State destroys America, or we destroy the Deep State.’ --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

Ping, hon!


7 posted on 06/21/2024 6:28:11 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (Either ‘the Deep State destroys America, or we destroy the Deep State.’ --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpirituTuo

Paul in Galatians 2:11–13 says: When Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong.


8 posted on 06/21/2024 6:28:39 PM PDT by Moonmad27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dacula

Maybe if we pray for him it will help.


9 posted on 06/21/2024 6:43:28 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

The maddening thing about this is that the pope is on jolly good terms with Joe Biden, the faux Catholic who openly and proudly flouts his support for anti-Catholic abortion and LGBTQ+ policies. Instead of excommunicating or criticizing Biden, he threatens a defender of traditional Catholic teaching for causing “schism.” Francis is demonic.


10 posted on 06/21/2024 6:43:43 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Wise choice Bishop Voigano
I’m with you !


11 posted on 06/21/2024 6:51:02 PM PDT by skinny old man (Still lurking and posting after all these years(27 yrs ?)(more ?)(seems like more...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: skinny old man

Sorry,Bishop Vigano’


12 posted on 06/21/2024 6:53:51 PM PDT by skinny old man (Still lurking and posting after all these years(27 yrs ?)(more ?)(seems like more...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
The pope speaks of a "schism" in the church and talks as if Vigano is the cause of it. In reality, there is a schism in the church, but it started decades ago with the subversion of Catholic seminaries, schools, colleges, and media by active agents of the left.

But I suppose "schismatic" is not the word, because the left wants nothing but total control and total obedience to a church that they are trying to turn into a pagan parody of the historical church. They are calling Vigano's resistance to this apostasy as "schismatic" - which from their point of view - it seems to be. But Jesus and Paul both pointed to a time of great apostasy and division in the church. Maybe we are now in that time.
13 posted on 06/21/2024 7:10:36 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Thanks for the ping, Merlin gurl.


14 posted on 06/21/2024 8:57:14 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Trump will be sworn in under a shower of confetti made from the tattered remains of the Rat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: skinny old man

I am hoping that he is a cardinal elevated by Pope Benedict.


15 posted on 06/21/2024 8:59:35 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Trump will be sworn in under a shower of confetti made from the tattered remains of the Rat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

LOL LOL!


16 posted on 06/21/2024 9:03:19 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (Either ‘the Deep State destroys America, or we destroy the Deep State.’ --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Praying for both Vigano and Bergoglio.


17 posted on 06/21/2024 9:28:59 PM PDT by reagandemocrat (Vote Dodger Blue. Vote Steve Garvey. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagandemocrat

I hate to sound MEAN, but why you be praying for Bergoglio?

This man...YES, HE IS A MAN...NOT SENT TO US BY SOME HEAVENLY SPIRIT, BUT BY SOME EVIL INTURRUPTION TO REIVIGORATE OUR BELIEF IN THE CATHOLIC TENETS...ABOUT WHICH, HE KNOWS NOTHING.

This man is not a Catholic, but some imposter who will reunite the Church in the long run.

Please God help us settle this problem.


18 posted on 06/21/2024 9:52:25 PM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

Great idea. Pray.


Maybe if we pray for him it will help.


19 posted on 06/21/2024 11:34:05 PM PDT by Dacula
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SpirituTuo

No need to persist in the vow of obedience to those who have abandoned the Catholic faith and essentially renounced it.


20 posted on 06/22/2024 12:49:32 AM PDT by steve86 (Numquam accusatus, numquam ad curiam ibit, numquam ad carcerem™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson