Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Good Friday Gaslighting
The Remnant Newspaper ^ | March 21, 2024 | Fr. Celatus

Posted on 03/22/2024 3:24:13 PM PDT by ebb tide

Good Friday Gaslighting

It has been twenty years since release of the movie, The Passion of the Christ, produced, directed and co-written by Mel Gibson. The film is the highest grossing Christian film of all time (inflation adjusted) as well as the highest grossing independent film of all time. As of 2023, it was also the highest grossing R rated film domestically, receiving an R rating due to its graphic depiction of the Passion of the Christ.

 

But before all the glory of its ultimate success and triumph, this film had its own passion to suffer and overcome at the hands of its enemies. These enemies included powerful Deep State and Deep Synagogue forces, representing the entertainment industry and media, as well as the Deep Church. Not only did the US Catholic Conference of Bishops refuse to support the film, but the USCCB issued this condemnation:

It [the film script] is one of the most troublesome texts, relative to anti-Semitic potential, that any of us had seen in 25 years. It must be emphasized that the main storyline presented Jesus as having been relentlessly pursued by an evil cabal of Jews, headed by the high priest Caiaphas, who finally blackmailed a weak-kneed Pilate into putting Jesus to death. This is precisely the storyline that fueled centuries of anti-Semitism within Christian societies. This is also a storyline rejected by the Roman Catholic Church at Vatican II in its document Nostra aetate, and by nearly all mainline Protestant churches in parallel documents...Unless this basic storyline has been altered by Mr. Gibson, a fringe Catholic who is building his own church in the Los Angeles area and who apparently accepts neither the teachings of Vatican II nor modern biblical scholarship, The Passion of the Christ retains a real potential for undermining the repudiation of classical Christian anti-Semitism by the churches in the last 40 years.

In fact, we are surprised that the Deep Church has not already reformed the Good Friday Passion account by stripping it of any references to the Jewish complicity in the Crucifixion of Christ. Of course, were it to do that, there would be little text or substance left of the account, rendering the Passion insubstantial.

It's shameful that the USCCB opposed The Passion of the Christ. But far worse is that the USCCB is now distancing itself from the Gospel Passion accounts themselves. It has now mandated that the following pastoral note on antisemitism be placed in worship aids and pew missals ahead of Good Friday services:

The passion narratives are proclaimed in full so that all see vividly the love of Christ for each person. In light of this, the crimes during the Passion of Christ cannot be attributed, in either preaching or catechesis, indiscriminately to all Jews of that time, nor to Jews today. The Jewish people should not be referred to as though rejected or cursed, as if this view followed from Scripture. The Church ever keeps in mind that Jesus, his mother Mary, and the apostles all were Jewish. As the Church has always held, Christ freely suffered his passion and death because of the sins of all, that all might be saved.

Truthfully, one can hardly fathom a disclaimer so intrusive to a sacred commemoration or more insulting to the faithful. Imagine if synagogues were required to publicize the following pastoral note at Passover:

The Passover narratives are proclaimed in full so that all see vividly the love of God for each person. In light of this, the crimes during the Exodus events cannot be attributed, in either preaching or catechesis, indiscriminately to all Gentiles of that time, nor to Gentiles today. The Gentile people should not be referred to as though rejected or cursed, as if this view followed from Scripture. The Synagogue ever keeps in mind that Moses was rescued by midwives and the daughter of Pharaoh, who were all Gentiles.

Well, here’s a pastoral note for the USCCB: your suggestion of antisemitism at Good Friday services is debunked by the popular practice of the Gentile faithful adopting the role of the Jewish crowd in reading aloud the Passion in Novus Ordo churches, even to the point of crying out, “Crucify Him! Crucify Him!”

The problem is not antisemitism on the part of Catholic faithful but the cowardness of the US Conference of Catholic Hirelings, who pander to a Deep Synagogue shaming them for the Gospel and Christ Himself. In a recent Last Word article, we demonstrated such pandering by the Deep Church in the matter of the prayer for Jews on Good Friday, which has now been stripped of any mention of Christ and conversion. This most recent pastoral note by the USCCB is yet another manifestation of pandering and cowardness.

In fact, we are surprised that the Deep Church has not already reformed the Good Friday Passion account by stripping it of any references to the Jewish complicity in the Crucifixion of Christ. Of course, were it to do that, there would be little text or substance left of the account, rendering the Passion insubstantial.

But that is precisely what the Deep Church has done in the Sacred Liturgies, namely, it renders not only the Passion but whatever else of Sacred Scripture is shameful for them or contrary to their modernist agenda as insubstantial or even non-existent. Would you like another example related to Sacred Liturgy?

How about Passiontide and more specifically Passion Sunday, both of which have been eliminated in the Novus Ordo liturgical calendar. Could one reason for this be the antisemitic Gospel of Passion Sunday?

At that time, Jesus said to the crowds of the Jews: Which of you can convict Me of sin? If I speak the truth, why do you not believe Me? He who is of God hears the words of God. The reason why you do not hear is that you are not of God. The Jews therefore in answer said to Him, Are we not right in saying that You are a Samaritan, and have a devil? Jesus answered, I have not a devil, but I honor My Father, and you dishonor Me…Jesus said to them, Amen, amen, I say to you, before Abraham came to be, I am. They therefore took up stones to cast at Him; but Jesus hid Himself, and went out from the temple.

The reality is that if the USCCB component of the Deep Church feels a need to mandate a pastoral note regarding antisemitism, then they must include the Evangelists, the Apostles and Jesus Christ Himself. And we assure you of this: the faithful are not antisemitic, but they are rightly anti-USCCB gaslighting!



TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: gaslighting; modernists; passionofthechrist; usccb; vcii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Big Red Badger

No, I remember Herod wanting Jesus to walk across it.
That was 1975 or 76. To this day, it’s one of my favorite musicals. I remember how controversial it was at the time.


21 posted on 03/22/2024 8:42:41 PM PDT by telescope115 (I NEED MY SPACE!!! 🔭)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Big Red Badger
"God did it."

Yes, but that doesn't absolve the culpability and guilt of the actors who killed Jesus. Those actors are foremost the Jewish leadership (Sanhedrin) who demanded Jesus be crucified and secondly the Romans who performed the execution. Pilate initially wanted to free Jesus but was coerced otherwise.

"From then on, Pilate tried to set Jesus free, but the Jewish leaders kept shouting, “If you let this man go, you are no friend of Caesar. Anyone who claims to be a king opposes Caesar.” When Pilate heard this, he brought Jesus out and sat down on the judge's seat at a place known as the Stone Pavement (which in Aramaic is Gabbatha). It was the day of Preparation of the Passover; it was about noon. “Here is your king,” Pilate said to the Jews. But they shouted, “Take him away! Take him away! Crucify him!” “Shall I crucify your king?” Pilate asked. “We have no king but Caesar,” the chief priests answered. Finally Pilate handed him over to them to be crucified." - John 19:12-16

Jesus makes it clear that the Jews (Sanhedrin) are more guilty than the Romans because they are the ones who demanded His crucifixion.

"Jesus answered, “You would have no power over me if it were not given to you from above. Therefore the one who handed me over to you is guilty of a greater sin.” - John 19-11

We need to be honest concerning sin! Whitewashing (gaslighting) Christ's passion and death for the sake of not offending a group (Jews) is wrong! It's a lie!

Both Jew and Gentile need to be saved through Christ's sacrifice - through His precious blood. There is no other way. We do no one any good by lying about the actors responsible for Christ's death. Jews may not like the part their ancestors played. I'm of Italian descent. I won't deny the role the Romans played in crucifying Christ.

Both Jew and Gentile come short of God's glory. We are both born into sin. We are both saved through Christ's sacrifice for our sins. We are all guilty of Christ's death.

Gaslighting truth is a lie!

22 posted on 03/23/2024 5:40:21 AM PDT by JesusIsLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JesusIsLord

We Are All Guilty...
.
By His Grace we pass from Death ot LIFE !
.
JESUS IS LORD


23 posted on 03/23/2024 7:30:30 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (ALL Things Will be Revealed !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill
The movie’s script was in Aramaic and Latin.

Which is probably something it got wrong. Romans and Jews in first century Judaea almost certainly would have spoken Greek to each other, not Latin.

Classical Latin of Jesus’ day but in Liturgical Latin, which emerged during the Middle Ages.

Ecclesiastical Latin and Classical Latin are really just two pronunciation styles, both of which were attempts to reconstruct the Latin pronunciation of Cicero's day. Ecclesiastical Latin pronunciation dates back to the English monk Alcuin in the 9th Century, who did his work on a commission from Charlemagne. "Classical" Latin pronunciation was developed by Erasmus in the 16th Century. Latin scholars generally agree that Erasmus got closer to the correct Ciceronian pronunciation.

Obviously it's all reconstruction and educated guesswork, since nobody alive has heard an actual Roman from 2000 years ago speaking Latin.

24 posted on 03/24/2024 3:48:54 PM PDT by Campion (Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Campion
A good source on Latin and other languages is Luke Ranieri's Youtube site Polymathy. In one of his videos, he walks through the streets of Rome speaking only Classical Latin, and the Romans think he's nuts. In another, he visits the Vatican speaking Liturgical Latin, and there he finds some people with whom he can converse.
25 posted on 03/24/2024 4:13:05 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson