Posted on 12/18/2023 2:34:23 PM PST by Morgana
This podcast is a book review of E. Michael Jones' "The Man Behind the Curtain, Michael Voris and the Homosexual Vortex"
This book was self published in 2016.
Podcast is 43 minutes long
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I have more to come on this. Sorry they are all videos
Voris has his problems and they are big problems, but Jones is an antisemite with no credibility.
Sounds like an X rated Star Trek episode.
or some faggots and a Hoover...
Voris is an admitted homosexual not by choice but because someone uncovered his secret life.He began with a small budget and a promise of abstinence for life.That made me take notice.He was a young man,why say that?After he was found to having a male lover who died people said continue Michael,they forget he began on a lie.I never followed him.Whats happening is joke that maybe could have been prevented.
I could never get past that awful rug he wears.
I don’t mean to argue with you, as I know little about E. Michael Jones. But if you say he’s antisemitic what do you base this conclusion on? If he has said he just doesn’t like Jews or holds some animus against them for historic purposes, I can well understand him being so labeled. But often you hear that opprobrium thrown around and there’s no basis for it. If this is not the case I’d like to know what you believe he did to deserve being so named.
Now I am an SSPX Catholic. I completely reject many of the teachings in Vatican II—especially Nostra Aetate. Does that make me an antisemite?
Also, there are many people who look askance at AIPAC and believe they are too influential on Capital Hill in their support for Israel. Pat Buchanan comes to mind in that regard. The media called him an antisemite for that. Was that deserved?
Indeed, some people genuinely believe that Israel was as wrong to drive the Palestinians out of the land they had occupied for centuries, much as England was wrong to drive the Catholics out of the North of Ireland 350 years ago. Are people who feel that way antisemites?
Again, I don’t mean to sound belligerent, but if E.Michael Jones is an antisemite it doesn’t say much for him as far as I’m concerned.
Perhaps you could share what you know about this man in that regard.
“Voris is an admitted homosexual not by choice but because someone uncovered his secret life...”
That is what he told the public. This video and more that I’m about to post tell otherwise. In fact it will make your hair curl
To put it bluntly he’s a “Filthy Disease Ridden Queer” and he’s been “at it again and again” since about 1997
No, though some TradCaths are, and who (contrary to past Roman means of assurance and unity) are actually acting as Bible Christians are to,as regards making the veracity of church teaching subject to the test of conformity with past historical church teaching.
The critical difference is that TradCaths selectively choose past, premodern RC teaching, while we are to look to the only wholly inspired substantive authoritative record of what the NT church believed (which is Scripture, in particular Acts through Revelation, which best shows how the NT church understood the gospels), in which distinctive Catholic teachings are not manifest.
May God grant you “repentance to the acknowledging of the truth.” (2 Timothy 2:25)
Sigh.
This gets old.
they don’t change
Would seem they get worse with time.
Thank you for your response although I was trying to learn what specific statements for actions E.Michael Jones engaged in to warrant his being labeled antisemitic—which he very well may be.
As for your labeling those who worship at an SSPX church “TradCaths,” I must respectfully respond and take issue. The priests of the SSPX and those who worship at their churches, are properly referred to as “Catholics.”
A Catholic is one who follows the immutable dogmas and doctrines of the Church as defined by the Magisterium. The Society does not deviate from even a single one of those teachings—which would include their refusal to bless homosexual unions, just the latest deviation from the faith by the very confused Modernist popes and bishops.
Would you be cool I have a bad cold
But sedevacantists (see https://freerepublic.com/focus/religion/4076852/posts?page=7#7) as well as Francis devotees also claim that title. And indeed, Rome manifestly treats even proabortion, prohomosexual public figures as members in life and in death (showing the Vatican's understanding of canon law, meaning Ted Kennedy Catholics are your brethren.
A Catholic is one who follows the immutable dogmas and doctrines of the Church as defined by the Magisterium.
And according to many papal statements - you are to follow the living magisterium, and not act like "Bible Christians" who are to determine the veracity of church teaching based upon examination of its conformity with historical church teaching.
But the only wholly inspired substantive authoritative record of what the NT church believed is Scripture, including Acts through Revelation, which best shows how the NT church understood the gospels).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.