No, though some TradCaths are, and who (contrary to past Roman means of assurance and unity) are actually acting as Bible Christians are to,as regards making the veracity of church teaching subject to the test of conformity with past historical church teaching.
The critical difference is that TradCaths selectively choose past, premodern RC teaching, while we are to look to the only wholly inspired substantive authoritative record of what the NT church believed (which is Scripture, in particular Acts through Revelation, which best shows how the NT church understood the gospels), in which distinctive Catholic teachings are not manifest.
May God grant you “repentance to the acknowledging of the truth.” (2 Timothy 2:25)
Sigh.
This gets old.
Thank you for your response although I was trying to learn what specific statements for actions E.Michael Jones engaged in to warrant his being labeled antisemitic—which he very well may be.
As for your labeling those who worship at an SSPX church “TradCaths,” I must respectfully respond and take issue. The priests of the SSPX and those who worship at their churches, are properly referred to as “Catholics.”
A Catholic is one who follows the immutable dogmas and doctrines of the Church as defined by the Magisterium. The Society does not deviate from even a single one of those teachings—which would include their refusal to bless homosexual unions, just the latest deviation from the faith by the very confused Modernist popes and bishops.