Posted on 07/01/2023 1:45:06 AM PDT by Cronos
Does the Bible claim to be inerrant? —that is, without error of any kind. But the Bible itself does not make such a claim. The Bible does not claim to be inerrant, however it does claim to be true. “The entirety of Your word is truth, and every one of Your righteous judgments endures forever” (Psalm 119:160, NKJV). It is important to note that “true” does not mean “inerrant.” (For more information see the “Does the Bible contradict itself?” and “Is the Bible inspired by God?”)
All correct or else not correct? Some have felt that if the Bible is not correct in every detail, then it can’t be relied upon. However, the “all or nothing” position is not a biblical one, even if it has been proclaimed by great men and spiritual giants. John Wesley, for example, wrote in his journal for August 24, 1776: “Nay, if there be any mistakes in the Bible, there may as well be a thousand. If there be one falsehood in that book, it did not come from the God of truth.” However, Paul tells us, “But avoid foolish disputes, genealogies, contentions, and strivings about the law, for they are unprofitable and useless” (Titus 3:9, NKJV). He also counsels us not to “give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which cause disputes rather than godly edification which is in faith” (1 Timothy 1:4, NKJV).
Once we get over the need to harmonize all the biblical details, fear disappears, and we can turn to the all-important task of listening to the essential message of Scripture, seeking to understand God’s will so that His truth can live in us. Whatever minor contradictions may seem to exist in the Bible, God has apparently let creep in. So although there may be minor discrepancies or details in the Bible, we can trust its teachings completely. Jesus said that heaven and earth would pass away before any of it would fail (see Matthew 5:17,18).
Over the centuries God has had faithful witnesses to whom He has committed His truth and who have preserved His Word. The manuscripts of the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures have been preserved through the ages by the miraculous care of God.
Imperfect, yet trustworthy? Many Bible readers, if they think they have found an inconsistency in its pages, often take the position that if they cannot trust every detail of the Bible record, they cannot trust it at all. The basic question, however, is: Does trustworthiness demand absolute perfection? If we view the Bible as a treatise on philosophy or science or history, then perhaps one might point to incidental flaws. But Scripture is more like a letter from a dear friend or family member. And if we determine its trustworthiness in much the same way as we do a trustworthy person, then absolute perfection is not required. The Bible has not been given to us in grand supernatural language, but in the language of ordinary humans. In order to reach human beings where they were, Jesus took on the form of humanity—the divine united with the human. Likewise, the Bible is a blend of the divine and human—God speaking to us through human beings.
We need to come to the point where we can take the Bible just as it is—the Inspired Word of God. We need to let God take care of His own Book, His living oracles, as He has done for ages. If those who focus on what they see as errors in Scripture, instead would cling to the Bible and obey its teachings, their criticisms in regard to its validity would come to an end, and not one of them would be lost.
The human and the divine united in God’s Word For nearly a century liberal, critical scholars have stressed the diversity in the documents of the Scriptures, but current theological thinking contains a renewed emphasis on the essential unity of the Bible. Its great unifying principle, its central theme, is the plan of salvation and the working out of that plan in human history. However, the unity of the Bible must not be interpreted as uniformity. In the various books of the Scriptures the plan of salvation is viewed from various angles and stress is laid on various aspects, with varying emphasis.
Like its author, Jesus Christ, the Bible is the result of a mysterious combination of the divine and the human. Just as the human mind is incapable of fully explaining how Jesus, the divine Son of God, could become a man and live with us on earth, so it cannot fully explain the Bible’s unity of the divine and the human. In writing the various books of the Bible, the authors’ own personalities had full play, and their own style and vocabulary are reflected in the finished product. Yet the Bible, is nevertheless “given by inspiration of God” (2 Timothy 3:16, NKJV). While men did the writing, they did so as they were moved by the Holy Spirit (see 2 Peter 1:21). Therefore, in a special sense the Bible is the Word of God.
Being far from the liberal doctrine of inspiration and almost as far from the neo-orthodox perspective, Adventists find themselves uncomfortable with Evangelical inerrancy
Why don’t you two Seventh day Adventists believe in the inerrancy of scripture?
Is it to justify the numerous errors in your prophetess Ellen g white claims?
As a former SDA, I think the Bible is inerrant, when properly understood. Many times the so-called mistakes that we find in the Bible is due to our lack of understanding or context and impatience of not waiting for God to bring harmony from context.
This is a change in my former church, because when I grew up in the Church, we were taught that the Bible is inerrant and anybody keeping practices that were contrary to the Bible were the ones in error.
I can’t speak for the others, but I was raised to believe that the Bible was inerrant and denominations stopped growing in doctrine once the people in that doctrine became comfortable with the doctrines they had even if those doctrines were errors.
There are bound to be differences in the number of denominations and sects in Christianity.
John 14:2,3
2 In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.
3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.
I believe Christ is saying that, despite any difference you might find, He’s got us covered.
Inerrent or mistranlation? Misinterpreted perhaps. From ancient Hebrew to unnuanced language, certainly. There are underpinnings of words an phrases in ancient Hebrew that will astound the rational might.
New Testament? It’s complicated. Ancient Greek has idiomatic themes running throughout that are either not understood or overlooked. Koine Greek was a common language, Aramaic idioms are interestingly overlooked and I wonder if Vulgar Latin untentionly overlooks deeper linguistic values.
If anything, cross translations have certainly led to complications and collisions in the rendered texts at present.
With that linguistic “bias” (i.e. noise, clutter) present perhaps inerrant is the wrong terminology to apply to the raw infiltered truth scriptures represent.
I read it every night (see tagline), and often go to an online Bible site the next morning to look at the original Hebrew or Greek.
I notice many liberties taken with translations.
Wow, somebody hates the Sabbath. Uh, go to our website. See what we really believe instead of what the internet says..
If ya think you hate the Sabbath now, wait till the real fireworks start.
If your perspective of the Bible is based on your choices about which pages to believe, then your entire religion is based on YOU not GOD.
It’s like the LDS saying the Bible is correct “if interpreted correctly” but we have the original Greek and Hebrew but the LDS doesn’t have the original Book of Mormon to determine if it was interpreted correctly.
“If interpreted correctly” has been picked up by liberal Protestant churches.
Joseph’s Coat of Many Colors is a bad translation back to the first translation
Please, a little common sense is necessary here. The Bible is the Word of God... but the Bible was written by how many participants including prophets, scribes, copiers and translators? a hundred? .... two hundred? ...three hundred?
Revelation/Inspiration flows from God perfectly, but man’s ability to communicate that and transmit that knowledge is imperfect.
You actually believe that hundreds of imperfect men through a 2,000 year timeline have the ability to communication, transcribe and translation perfectly without the slightest error?
It’s irrelevant. We have the original text in the original language
Two articles slamming SDAs. Wow, you are on a tear. It must be hate the Sabbath Day time again. You realize pride is a deadly sin, don’t you?
Slamming the SDA cult?
What are you talking about?
Are you saying you Adventists believe in biblical inerrancy?
And do you have any comment on why you Adventists say that the Bible is not inerrant?
Why did you leave the Adventists? Were you shunned after you left?
Is that why you Adventists disagree with biblical inerrancy?
The books of Scripture teach solidly, faithfully and without error that truth which God wanted put into sacred writings for the sake of salvation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.