Posted on 06/20/2023 4:40:55 PM PDT by ebb tide
In March 2003, an amateur photographer, Kenneth Adelman, posted a series of 12,000 aerial photographs on his website to denounce the effects of erosion and real estate development on the California coast with, to be generous, little impact.
But in one of those photographs appeared the mansion of the actress and singer Barbra Streisand, who considered it an invasion of her privacy and sued Adelman. The result was a trial that was made public, which lost the Hollywood star and which managed to get Adelman's website to register 420,000 visits in a single month. The 'Streisand effect' was born, when the attempt to censor or cover up certain information results in the exact opposite effect.
Traditionis custodes has failed, and it has done so, to a large extent, by a process very similar to the 'Streisand effect'. The adherents of the traditional Mass are a tiny minority, statistically negligible in the Catholic world, but at the time of the publication of the papal motu proprio it was much more so and, above all, the very existence of that tiny redoubt was virtually unknown to the public. Average practicing Catholic. And that is what Francis's document ended with.
Suddenly, the Pope was dealing with a matter that seemed to be no one's problem, about which the overwhelming majority knew nothing at all. That already made it intriguing.
It was even more intriguing to contemplate this pontiff who has made mercy his motto, singling out an insignificant group for his censure without being able to justify his restrictions except with vague accusations and suspicions without evidence; to observe how a Pope especially fond of diversity, eager to unite more or less distant religions, took the trouble to attack a group of perfectly orthodox Catholic faithful. God, it seems, wants the plurality of religions, but ...
(Excerpt) Read more at infovaticana-com.translate.goog ...
Ping
Doncha love A.I.-generated text?!
Regards,
The source link says it was translated from Spanish text. If the translating program (in this case, Google Translate) is not sophisticated enough to include grammar and is just doing literal translation, that is what one gets. Google Translate may include A.I. I don't know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.