| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 04/24/2022 5:40:39 AM PDT by Religion Moderator, reason:
Childishness |
Posted on 03/06/2022 11:16:06 AM PST by CharlesOConnell
It was encouragement so that you don’t quit after your first attempt in despair.
Now, let’s go over again your belief that Ellen White saw people living on other planets and saw Enoch visiting them.
Do you really believe that?
Maybe post it another 5x.
“ In 1981 the church hired
All you need to know.
1) Ramik had been raised a Roman Catholic (though not a “practicing” Catholic at the time of his research [read interview below]) and one of the books he examined was, in fact, The Great Controversy—not exactly flattering to that Church or the Pope.
2) Ramik later admitted in an interview that he had been biased against Ellen White when he went into the project, for he had read the work of many of her critics from D.M. Canright right up to the pre-publication manuscript of The White Lie itself.
------------------------------------------------ Dude, how many times does someone have to tell you not to pretend to read someone's mind/conscience, and put it in print on this forum?
Is it POSSIBLE that the ENTIRE exercise of 2,500 plus posts ALLOWED by the GOOD LORD was to allow us to DISCOVER our OWN possible TRUTH?
"He Who Knows, DOES NOT SPEAK.. He Who Speaks, DOES NOT KNOW!"
It may just be that GOD'S TRUTH is ONLY KNOWABLE and NOT SPEAKABLE.
Maybe post it another 5x.
“ In 1981 the church hired
All you need to know.
Miller & Martin PLLC was hired by Ravi Zacharapist International Ministries (“RZIM”) to conduct
an independent investigation into these allegations.
I guess they should have hired Vincent Ramik (nah, wouldn’t have changed anything....)
—> Ramik later admitted in an interview that he had been biased
Hey! A non-practicing is as interested in $300 billable hours as any other attorney…
“Yo, Ramik, my cousin Vinny said you can write up a report for us - any way we want it to come out? That right??”
“Who is this? What’s Vinny’s last name? Where’d you meet him?”
“And assuming I like your answers, my rate is $500/hour for favorable reports.”
“Yes. We’ve got loads of money! That would be great!!”
…
OK Professor! Drop and prove he was honest.
Also show why two previous studies reached a different result.
Follow the rules. Mind reading isn’t allowed.
What “studies” and by whom? Were any of them from a specialist in patent, trademark, and copyright law? Please show me those. Go...
Posted up thread and linked by luircin.
——>OK Professor! Drop and prove he was honest.
The burden of proof is on YOU, Professor B.T. AMPU
no idea what that means
I reiterate: "He Who Knows, DOES NOT SPEAK.. He Who Speaks, DOES NOT KNOW!"
Sorry, but he’s your witness. He was paid by your people.
He had a conflict of interest and his opinion conflicted with earlier research.
So I don’t buy it as a legitimate opinion at all.
sum ting wong
——>So I don’t buy it as a legitimate opinion at all.
I’ll take the opinion of a specialist in patent, trademark, and copyright law over you, any day. He was initially biased AGAINST EGW right from the start. And Ramik being Catholic? Your assertion is laughable.
Opinion:
Ramik was given all the allegations of plagiarism from the first raised in 1889 to 1981.
“Based upon our review of the facts and legal precedents, we conclude that Ellen G. White was not a plagiarist and her works did not constitute copyright infringement/piracy.” (Adventist Review, Sept. 17, 1981)
“Considering all factors necessary in reaching a just conclusion on this issue, it is submitted that the writings of Ellen G. White were conclusively unplagiaristic.” (Ibid)
The air is rapidly going OUT of your balloon.
Even the login name you post with, "Philsworld", defines you as someone locked into his own little world and is always eager to defend it.
I have read the majority of posts on this VERY LENGTHY thread and i have read and heard MUCH TRUTH in MANY POSTS.
That would lead me to conclude, perhaps.. "ALL WAYS are the WAYS!"
—> I’ll take the opinion of
Your posting history leaves no doubt that you would believe anything supportive of the false religion and deny any fact that demonstrates it’s true character.
Heck, you even posted you believe White visited other worlds, saw unfallen people there, and saw Enoch visiting them.
Your posting history doesn’t paint you as objective.
——>Your posting history leaves no doubt that you would believe anything supportive of the false religion and deny any fact that demonstrates it’s true character.
because you say it’s a false religion? Any religion that doesn’t believe in keeping the commandments of God IS a false religion. Add OSAS and the PTR and you have a trifecta. THAT is a true FALSE religion.
Why don’t you read up on those two links I posted on the remnant.
—> because you say it’s a false religion?
No, because your religion was founded by and follows as an authority a false prophet who was a spirit medium.
Because your false religion uses her writings as an authority over the Scriptures…
And because of the heresy it teaches.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.