——>So I don’t buy it as a legitimate opinion at all.
I’ll take the opinion of a specialist in patent, trademark, and copyright law over you, any day. He was initially biased AGAINST EGW right from the start. And Ramik being Catholic? Your assertion is laughable.
Opinion:
Ramik was given all the allegations of plagiarism from the first raised in 1889 to 1981.
“Based upon our review of the facts and legal precedents, we conclude that Ellen G. White was not a plagiarist and her works did not constitute copyright infringement/piracy.” (Adventist Review, Sept. 17, 1981)
“Considering all factors necessary in reaching a just conclusion on this issue, it is submitted that the writings of Ellen G. White were conclusively unplagiaristic.” (Ibid)
—> I’ll take the opinion of
Your posting history leaves no doubt that you would believe anything supportive of the false religion and deny any fact that demonstrates it’s true character.
Heck, you even posted you believe White visited other worlds, saw unfallen people there, and saw Enoch visiting them.
Your posting history doesn’t paint you as objective.