Posted on 01/07/2022 1:52:54 PM PST by ebb tide
VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — In his homily for the feast of the Epiphany on Thursday, Pope Francis once more attacked Catholics attached to the tradition of the Church. He also seemed to contradict the words of St. Paul when describing the Catholic faith.
Delivering his homily for the Epiphany in St. Peter’s Basilica, Pope Francis used the journey of the three Magi as a basis for promoting his personal concept of Catholicism, and for issuing one of his trademark criticisms of traditional Catholics.
The pontiff directly rejected St. Paul’s language of the “shield of faith,” urging Catholics instead to view faith as “a constant and restless movement.”
Speaking of the Magi’s “desire” which fueled their journey, Pope Francis attacked Catholics who did not have a desire which “carries us forward.”
“The journey of life and faith demands a deep desire and inner zeal,” he said. “Sometimes we live in a spirit of a ‘parking lot’; we stay parked, without the impulse of desire that carries us forward.”
“We do well to ask: Where are we on our journey of faith? Have we been stuck all too long, nestled inside a conventional, external and formal religiosity that no longer warms our hearts and changes our lives?”
In comments seeming to allude to the Traditional Latin Mass, Pope Francis attacked the liturgical devotees of a “dead language.” “Do our words and our liturgies ignite in people’s hearts a desire to move towards God, or are they a ‘dead language’ that speaks only of itself and to itself?” he asked.
Instead of such “dead” liturgy, Pope Francis pushed for a style of Catholicism filled with “unsettling joy of the Gospel” and moments of being “startled by Jesus.”
“It is sad when a community of believers loses its desire and is content with ‘maintenance’ rather than allowing itself to be startled by Jesus and by the explosive and unsettling joy of the Gospel,” continued the Pope. “It is sad when a priest has closed the door of desire, sad to fall into clerical functionalism, very sad.”
Presenting a method to follow the Magi’s “school of desire,” Pope Francis appeared to contradict the words of St. Paul in his letter to the Ephesians when referencing faith.
“The Magi teach us that we need to set out anew each day, in life as in faith, for faith is not a suit of armour that encases us; instead, it is a fascinating journey, a constant and restless movement, ever in search of God, always discerning our way forward,” declared the Pontiff.
subscribe to our daily headlines
However, in stark contrast, St. Paul describes faith as the “armor of God,” and calls on Catholics to take up the “shield of faith,” in order to “extinguish all the fiery darts of the most wicked one.”
St. Paul writes:
Therefore take unto you the armour of God, that you may be able to resist in the evil day, and to stand in all things perfect. Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of justice, and your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace. In all things taking the shield of faith, wherewith you may be able to extinguish all the fiery darts of the most wicked one. And take unto you the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit (which is the word of God).
While the Pope called for Catholics to engage in “a constant and restless movement,” St. Paul urged the members of the Church to “stand against the deceits of the devil” using the imagery of faith as both armor and weaponry.
Francis continued by urging Catholics to imitate the Magi through questioning, doubling down on his concept of a faith which unsettles.
Yet let us also be unsettled by the questions of our children, and by the doubts, hopes and desires of the men and women of our time,” he said. “We need to entertain questions.”
“God addresses us more with questions than with answers,” added Pope Francis.
Such a faith which undermines or unsettles would allow Catholics to “take new paths,” added Francis, highlighting how his current multi-year Synod on Synodality promoted such “new paths.”
“The Magi return ‘by another way’. They challenge us to take new paths,” he said.
Here we see the creativity of the Spirit who always brings out new things. That is also one of the tasks of the Synod we are currently undertaking: to journey together and to listen to one another, so that the Spirit can suggest to us new ways and paths to bring the Gospel to the hearts of those who are distant, indifferent or without hope, yet continue to seek what the Magi found: “a great joy” (Mt 2:10). We must always move forwards.
The Synod calls on bishops to listen to lapsed Catholics and non-Catholics as part of the “renewal of the Church proposed by the Second Vatican Council.”
Pope Francis reinforced his message of seeking “new paths” in a subsequent message posted to his official Twitter account, quoting from his homily.
Media attention on the Pontiff’s homily, which also promoted Eucharistic adoration, was focussed on the latest papal attack on traditional Catholics, after a year marked by severe restrictions on the traditional liturgy, in the Pope’s July motu proprio Traditionis custodes and the Vatican’s December Responsa ad dubia.
Reuters reported that the Pope’s homily contained “specific criticism at those who have balked at his decision to restrict the traditionalist Latin Mass,” marking another chapter in the “Church’s ‘liturgy wars’.”
U.K. blogger Mark Lambert blasted the Pope, writing “Does he really think he will convince anyone with this constant self justification?”
So, Francis wants scripture to mean whatever he wants it to mean.
Why haven’t they gotten rid of this imposter?
Ping
But keep sending money!
The enemy hates Latin.
That it is a dead language adds to its power. It cannot be used for propaganda and progress-away from Jesus, the founder of Catholicism.
The antipope is a vile pachamama pagan and hate the message of Jesus.
I took two yrs of Latin in hs.
It was good for understanding the basis of English language, and also for learning Spanish.
But it has always seemed to me that people should have the Mass in their own language.
It isn’t dead. Latin suffuses every current Western language from Italy to German and English, not just our words, but our patterns of speech and the way we write.
“Why haven’t they gotten rid of this imposter?”
If a morally and spiritually corrupt Pope is in the Vatican, don’t you think he was put there by morally and spiritually corrupt Cardinals?
Once installed why would said corrupt Cardinals want him out?
Nope, the Catholics are stuck with Frankie until he assumes room temp. The downside is the same Cardinals that selected Frankie will select his successor.
Now not being Catholic I usually stay out of discussions about the RC church, except where Pope Frankenstein is the object of discussion.
Saint Paul > Heretic Francis.
“ But it has always seemed to me that people should have the Mass in their own language.”
You have this opinion. Yet I question whether you have ever been to a Latin mass
You say it with no considers I would guess.
“ It isn’t dead. Latin suffuses every current Western language from Italy to German and English, not just our words, but our patterns of speech and the way we write.”
I catholicism it is said Latin is a dead language. And not in the perjorative. It is a good thing. No one converses in Latin. There are no new meanings of words no new words. It means what it means. On cannot change the mass when the Latin is preserved.
Well I went to my first Mass in the early 1950s so I guess I went to a few Latin Masses. I remember a kid asking in high school why we had Mass in the language of the people who killed Jesus rather than the language that Jesus spoke.
He hates the Church so much, why is he the leader of it?
Did you get an answer? We’re you interested in the answer? Did you explore it? Sounds like not in 60 years. So your theology, arguing for a mass in the vernacular, did not withstand a lot of research
So why are you wasting my time?
Yes I am corrected. I do have a point.
Latin is considered a dead language because it is not commonly used to converse. It is quite protected from progressivism as such
And the enemy hates it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.