Posted on 05/29/2021 6:24:30 PM PDT by ebb tide
Cross-posted from the FIUV.
Sergey Budaev, "Safety and Reverence: How Roman Catholic Liturgy Can Respond to the COVID-19 Pandemic" Journal of Religion and Health (2021), published 24th May 2021.
Among many interesting observations of this article, which cites a great many studies, is that while reception on the tongue does not appear to be more dangerous than reception in the hand, reception kneeling is clearly preferable to reception standing. We reproduce a key passage below; the whole article can be read here (or download the pdf here).
The Holy Species used in the Latin Rite is nearly dry and therefore is likely to have low adhesion of outside particles, further reducing the infectious risk. While receiving the Holy Bread, the communicant normally extends the tongue forward, requiring to hold breath for a while. This reduces possible respiratory output. The traditional manner of receiving Communion on the tongue is therefore unlikely to incur a high risk of infection transmission.
Traditional reverent practice of the Catholic Church incorporates additional elements making it even less risky in the current COVID-19 pandemic. The kneeling position of the faithful while receiving the Host would provide spatial distancing about 50 cm (Fig. 1a): the communicant’s face is located at the level of the chest of the Eucharistic Minister. Provided the communicant stays silent, uses nasal breathing, and the duration of the interaction is short (very few seconds), this would not incur a high risk to the Eucharistic Minister (usually the priest whose safety is prioritized, see above). Furthermore, reduced verbal response of the communicant directs the droplets and aerosol towards the chest of the Minister, which is by far a lower risk than in the face.
In contrast, the typical position of the communicant for Communion in the hand is standing which is the direct, close, face-to-face interaction (Fig. 1b). Any verbal interaction between the Eucharistic Minister and the communicant would direct the droplets and aerosol directly to the Minister’s face and the Holy Bread. Inhaling such aerosol could be risky. The statistical argument (see “” above) points to an increasing probability that in a large group, at least one member is infected, further aggravating the risk to the Minister. If the communicant happens to cough or sneeze, Minister’s face and the Holy Bread become the direct target of both fine and larger ballistic droplets. This is very unlikely in the kneeling position.
Another potentially important factor is that it would be much easier for the Minister to operate fine motorics when the communicant is kneeling than standing. This is due to a much better visual feedback and more convenient hand position when the communicant is kneeling (note that fine manual workers such as watchmakers use tables for routine work rather than stands elevated to the level of their eyes). This would make it easier for the Minister to place the Holy Host optimally and safely on the tongue, avoiding contacts with the mucous membrane and the saliva.
Even though the hands of the Communicant are often assumed to be clean, there is no guarantee. Again, the statistical argument (see above) points to an exponentially growing chance for at least one person with contaminated hands to occur as the group size increases. The typical position of the hands during the prayer—directly in front of the face—makes them susceptible to contamination by exalted and ballistic droplets and aerosol. The assumption that Communion in the hand carries no or little risk is not well grounded and may in fact create a false sense of security potentially provoking more reckless behaviour of both the Minister and the communicant.
Ping
Good Grief!
Incase people wanted to know the “science”
I guess.
I guess this can mollefy those of uncertain disposition to receive.
Figure (a) is disturbing, but could priest be taught to wash their hands?
Guess I’ll stick with the dispensation.
Funny how Antifa/BLM “peaceful” protests are never scrutinized as spreaders like church is continually attacked by the Covidistas.
figure a looks like the traditional way to receive communion
That’s disappointing to hear.
We have been attending our Anglican Catholic Church in Houston for the past two months. Clergy hasn’t worn masks since two months ago and Church is almost full with less than 10% wearing masks. We take communion on the tongue kneeling at the altar. There are more women and girls wearing veils than people wearing masks. So great to be back to normal!
If one bows their head, the direction would be down.
I should have caucused this thread to keep the deaf pervert off of it.
Has there also been a study on the transmissibility of the covid at abortion clinics?
The General Instruction of the Roman Missal states: "The bread and wine are placed on the altar by the Priest to the accompaniment of the prescribed formulas... “Then the priest washes his hands at the side of the altar, a rite in which the desire for interior purification finds expression” (No. 75a, 76: https://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/the-mass/general-instruction-of-the-roman-missal/girm-chapter-2). But apparently some confectors opt out of it.
However, the risk of transmission is more likely thru air rather than the hand, and which kneeling to receive would reduce (as would good ventilation). Yet besides the major unScriptural aspects of the Catholic contrivance of the Lord's supper with its unScriptural priesthood, the idea that the Lord went around placing a piece of (non-existent) bread in the mouth of every apostle as they knelt before Him can only be read into the text.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.