Posted on 04/05/2021 6:45:35 PM PDT by marshmallow
On March 8, Cambridge, Massachusetts City Council adopted amendments to the city's Domestic Partnership Ordinance allowing polyamorous domestic partnership. The ordinance now provides that
"Domestic partnership" means the entity formed by two or more persons who meet the following criteria and jointly file a registration statement proclaiming that: 1. They are in a relationship of mutual support, caring and commitment and intend to remain in such a relationship; ... 5. They consider themselves to be a family.
(Excerpt) Read more at religionclause.blogspot.com ...
I predict more murders of passion and “business” dealing among members of the incestuous “family”....plus if one member gets HIV or hpv or herpes...or syph..or the CLAP..or hepb or c....they all get it...gonna be lots of secrets and anger...and illness...
Good point.
What if A,B,C and D are "persons" "married." D wants marriage counseling and will not consent to divorce without it. A and B would leave the C and D components and have their own marriage but can't without huge business and stock and bond fortune being divided with C and D. No dice. C is announcing a sex change. Judge announce retirement from the bench.
So you’re saying the TV reality shows were behind this getting passed?
We are outdoing Sodom & Gomorrah. I expect the Almighty to lift any protection our nation may have been receiving.
Expect punishment by one source or another.
Ha! And who pays alimony to whom?
Unless the women are sisters, in which case you are in a WORLD of hurt...
Yes bet your bottom dollar on this one. What we are seeing is the death of a civilization, where immorality is elevated to a virtue. Early examples are the Greeks, and when they were conquered by the Romans (who were conservative for a while) the Romans adopted their old, dying and perverted culture. Then the Romans fell to the deplorables, excuse me, barbarians.
I've always told my sister-wives that gay "marriage" was an abomination. 'course, some of the younger ones couldn't even spell "abomination."
Regards,
I really was only a matter of time since the deviants threw open the definition of marriage to all takers.
2003, the same year as Lawerence v. Texas, which invalidate all laws against homosexual acts nationwide.
Does that include Muslim polygamy? FLDS Mormon polygamy?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.