Posted on 12/30/2020 3:16:37 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
Read the stinking article and you’ll find out exactly what it means.
Here, from the article, copied and pasted.....
“Three, on Dec. 18, 2020, it was reported that an influential group called Secular Democrats of America (SDA) sent a 28-page document to former Vice-Pres. Biden’s transition team urging Mr. Biden to eliminate the political clout of the religious right (white Christians that do not want to surrender the sovereignty of the U.S.).
SDA is an anti-Christian group that calls the religious right a national security threat, it wants the Dept. of Justice to restrict indoor gatherings even in houses of worship, and it is supported by several elected Democrats in Congress (Jamie Raskin, Jared Huffman, Jerry McNerney, and at least 11 others). “
You’ve made a fool of yourself. Read next time.
You tell me. YOU’RE the one advocating Law keeping.
Or are you only going to advocate Law keeping when it’s convenient or easy to do and choose to ignore the other parts of the Law you aren’t interested in keeping?
They were suffering tribulation, not the Great Tribulation.
No, he specifically says “the” tribulation.
Rev 1:
I can admit when I’m wrong. I’m wrong. I saw SDA and assumed Seventh Day Adventist. My apologies. But, everything I said about SDA’s (Seventh Day Adventists) applies.
Why would you assume the seals had not yet been opened when John finally Rev. 1 ?
John was sent to the Island of Patmos during the tribulation of the Roman Emperor. And it was a time of severe tribulation, but not the Tribulation where it is GOD pouring out His wrath in increasing severity upon the whole Earth. John is in spirit right now, awaiting his resurrection and glorified body. He is not suffering tribulation and did not during his lifetime suffer the wrath of God Tribulation.
You tell me. YOU’RE the one advocating Law keeping.
If you insist on keeping the Law in regard to the Sabbath, then you must keep the WHOLE Law down to the last letter, perfectly.
Why? Because I read on from chapter one. When I got to chapter four I read John called up to Heaven, and following that zip-trip he witnesses what is to come, namely the opening of the seals, etc. Reading a passage in context of the greater message prevents errors like you are espousing.
So John wrote the book after the visions. And why would you think Revelation is written in chronological order? John specifically says he is a partaker in “the” tribulation.
Since you have chosen to be judged by the law, it is you who must now keep the whole law to avoid damnation under the law. Christ tok flesh to dwell among us to end that curse, but you have chosento set His work aside in favor of your work at keeping the law. So have at it cultist, keep the entire letter of the law ... or give up, call upon the Grace of God to save tyou rather than your pitiful attempts at keeping the whole letter of the law.
If you want to cling to a false reading, I cannot change your end point. BUT if you are reasonable you will see that what John referred to in chapter one was not the wrath of God Tribulation, but the sufferings caused by the Emperor of Rome. And, just to be precise, John is told to (Rev 1:19) “Write the things which you have seen, and the things which are, and the things which will take place after this.” I read that as a chronological order. And the rest of the Book reads in chronological order and also from a Heavenly perspective of temporal things as time runs in Heaven.
Since Metmom can’t answer my question, I’ll ask you.
WHAT LAW?
You are technically correct about the site of the rebuilt Temple, but why bother? Why is the a problem with it being on the Temple Mount? There is plenty of room on that site. The only thing I have ever heard is the Muslims would never allow such a thing. I do not know why that is an objection.
“There is nothing in Scripture...” that says it cannot be exactly where the Jews say they are gonna put it. What’s the prob?
Thanks for your time.
😁
Why would you think the acts of Rome were not part of God’s wrath? God used the Babylonians to visit his wrath on Jerusalem. The Romans could easily have served the same purpose - the letters to the 7 churches confirm this.
Your cultish efforts to bait and taunt are childish. You cannot know whether metmom can or cannot answer your twisted deviously spewed questions. And I certainly do not intend to give you any further responses since you work for ‘the other side’.
http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/dan927.htm
Daniel 9:25 Subject is Messiah
Daniel 9:26 Subject is Messiah
Daniel 9:27 Subject is STILL Messiah (not antichrist)
Daniel’s 70 week prophecy (490 years) is the first part of the longer 2300 year prophecy. There is no separation, no magical transfer of 7 years 2000+ years into the future.
There is no pre-trib rapture. Daniel 9 does not support it.
It would serve you well to learn the difference between the Wrath of God and the chastisements from God. The Babylonians were used to chastise Israel. Chastisement is a recurring theme with Israel. The wrath of God is poured out on the world of the unbelievers, in Israel and around the world. The wrath of God is the result of the world rejecting The Grace of God in Christ. The Redeemed, the individuals who have been born again into the Body of Christ Velievers are not subject to that wrath because they have been appointed unto salvation, not wrath (1 Thess 1:10 is a good place to start in studying who is or is not subject to the wrath of God.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.