Posted on 10/22/2020 5:25:59 AM PDT by Gamecock
Our memory of what took place during the sixteenth-century Reformation has been somewhat selective. As heirs of Reformed Protestantism, we have remembered it chiefly as a recovery of the gospel and the biblical way of worship. But we also need to recall it as a great recovery of the biblical understanding of marriage.
Building on the monastic piety of late antiquity—found in authors such as Augustine and Jerome—the medieval church had come to regard the celibate life of the monastery or nunnery as the seedbed of a spirituality far superior to that found in the homes of those who were married. The celibate, it was argued, lived the life of the angels, and thus already experienced in some ways the life of the world to come. With the growing corruption of the church in the late Middle Ages, however, the reality was that far too many of the clergy were celibate but not chaste.
Luther, Pioneer Husband And Father
Although Martin Luther was not the first of the Reformers to marry and have a family, his marriage to Katharina von Bora on June 13, 1525, became in many ways the paradigmatic ideal for the Protestant family. Initially, their marriage was no love match. Katharina had escaped from a nunnery in Nimbsch, near Grimma, with a number of other nuns and wound up in Wittenberg seeking refuge. For a time, Luther acted as a sort of marriage broker, seeking to find husbands for the nuns. Eventually, Katharina alone was left, and Luther married her, he said, to please his father, who had always wanted grandchildren, and also, as Luther inimitably put it, to spite the pope.
These are hardly the best of reasons for marriage, but in time, their marriage “blossomed into a partnership of real depth and touching devotion,” to quote Andrew Pettegree in his recent study of Martin Luther. This “joyous success” of Martin and Katharina’s marriage and the six children who came from their union became, in Pettegree’s words, “a powerful archetype of the new Protestant family.” Luther’s love for his children led him to rightly see that central to the joys of marriage was the gift of sons and daughters. And “people who do not like children,” he once said in his blunt style, are “dunces and blockheads, not worthy to be called men and women, because they despise the blessings of God, the creator and author of marriage.”
The Marriage Of John Calvin
When John Calvin came to marry, he told his close friend and coworker William Farel in the late 1530s that he was not at all concerned with physical beauty. What he wanted was a wife who was chaste and sensible, economical and patient, and able “to take care of my health.”
Unlike Luther, who was quite public regarding details of his married life, Calvin rarely spoke about his marriage to Idelette de Bure during their eight-and-a-half years of marriage—she died in March 1549, having suffered from ill health for a number of years. But now and then, a remark shows how close they were to one another. For example, Calvin was with his wife in Strasbourg during the spring of 1541. A plague was raging in the city, and Calvin decided to stay in Strasbourg but sent his wife away for her own safety. He wrote to Farel that “day and night my wife has been constantly in my thoughts, in need of advice now that she is separated from her husband.”
They had one son, Jacques, who died soon after birth in 1542. “The Lord,” Calvin wrote to a close friend Pierre Viret, “has certainly inflicted a severe and bitter wound in the death of our baby son. But he is himself a Father and knows best what is good for his children.”
At the time of his wife’s death, Calvin stated in a letter to Farel: “Truly mine is no common grief. I have been bereaved of the best friend of my life, of one who, if it had been so ordained, would willingly have shared not only my poverty but also my death. During her life she was the faithful helper of my ministry.” This is a remarkable passage and reveals the depth of the change that the Protestant Reformation had brought about. Marriage was now seen as God intended it in Genesis 2: the union of intimate allies, working for a common cause, namely, the extension of God’s kingdom.
Great history lesson! Last sentence is such truth that it gladdened my heart this morning!!!
The Reformation’s residual impact stripped marriage of its spiritual and sacramental dimensions and devolved it into a mere legal contract — subject more to secular demands and materialistic concerns — than to heavenly ones. One of the great tragedies of Christendom. And fully I’m keeping with the cultural rot to follow.
In* keeping.
Bottom line: get married intelligently, then learn to love each other.
Romanticism, in both senses of “romance” and the philosophy of feelings-are-more-important-than-facts, turned this inside out: you’re supposed to fall in love with the partner-of-your-dreams, and then somehow learn how to stay married. What’s amazing is not how often that fails, but that it ever works at all.
Bottom line: get married intelligently, then learn to love each other.
Romanticism, in both senses of “romance” and the philosophy of feelings-are-more-important-than-facts, turned this inside out: you’re supposed to fall in love with the partner-of-your-dreams, and then somehow learn how to stay married. What’s amazing is not how often that fails, but that it ever works at all.
In all fairness, the Reformers didn't do this. The Enlightenment did, along with the wealth creation of the last four centuries that provided the majority with something they had never had before, disposable income, allowing for the pursuit of pleasure to the detriment of spiritual discipline.
The Reformation had double edged sword. In some areas restraining the excesses of the Enlightenment. In others: initiating and fostering the Enlightenment’s key components.
Ah, but they did. The article itself notes that... Luther "acted as a sort of marriage broker", specifically intended nuns to BREAK their vows of celibacy and their oath to be married to God on a spiritual level, so they could "find husbands" and be happy during their brief temporal existence on earth.
The "Reformers" did NOT see marriage as a sacred sacramental union, but rather a mere legal contract — subject more to secular demands and materialistic concerns.
Luther even married Philip of Hesse to a second wife (in other words, polygamy) because his supposedly vast "Biblical scholarship" couldn't find a justification to resist doing so. (Uh, how about "Adam and Eve," not "Adam and Eve and Sarah and Jessica and Stacy and Hannah ..." ... duh!)
And don't get me started on the so-called "reformers" tolerance for divorce. Just open your Bible to Malachi 2:16 and see what God thinks about it.
bump
Agreed, my post #10 pretty much made the same point. I see no one on this thread has tried to refute it. Hmmm.
Who is "we"? Michael Haykin certainly does not speak for me, or what I remember the protestant reformation for.
Campion nd don't get me started on the so-called "reformers" tolerance for divorce.
It was oh so better that the Popes had concubines and fathered illegitimate children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.