Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two German bishops advocate for change in Church teaching on homosexuality
LifeSite News ^ | February 5, 2020 | Martin Bürger

Posted on 02/05/2020 2:20:06 PM PST by ebb tide

Two German bishops advocate for change in Church teaching on homosexuality

The archbishop of Hamburg said the Church doesn’t meet homosexuals on equal footing and criticized the Catechism’s call for homosexuals to live chaste lives.

FRANKFURT, Germany, February 5, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Two German bishops have called the Church to change its teaching on homosexuality and recognize the “values” like fidelity that are allegedly lived in homosexual relationships.

Archbishop Stefan Heße and Bishop Georg Bätzing made their remarks at the first assembly of the synodal path in Germany, which concluded on Saturday, February 1, 2020.

Heße, the archbishop of Hamburg, distanced himself from the Church’s teaching on homosexuality, as reported by katholisch.de, the news website of the German bishops. Instead, he said, the Church should explore new avenues.

The expression of the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC), according to which those with homosexual inclinations need to be met with respect, means the Church is looking down on them, rather than meeting them on equal footing, Heße argued.

“Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that ‘homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.’ They are contrary to the natural law,” the Catechism teaches (CCC 2357). “They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.”

The homosexual inclination is “objectively disordered,” the Catechism says. Those who experience it “must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God's will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition” (CCC 2358).

The archbishop of Hamburg, which is the northernmost diocese in Germany, also criticized that the Church calls homosexuals to live a chaste life.

Heße insisted that from his experience as a spiritual director, he knows that many homosexually inclined people are in relationships where values like “respect and responsibility” are lived. He demanded the Church to do justice to this supposed reality. According to the article by katholisch.de, this exclamation was met with applause among the members of the assembly.

As Heße pointed out, the CCC indeed says, “Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.”

However, what is said of homosexuals, the Catechism holds as true also of everybody else, saying, “All the baptized are called to chastity.”

Still speaking of every human being, the Catechism maintains, “Whoever wants to remain faithful to his baptismal promises and resist temptations will want to adopt the means for doing so: self-knowledge, practice of an ascesis adapted to the situations that confront him, obedience to God's commandments, exercise of the moral virtues, and fidelity to prayer.”

Together with Franz-Josef Bode, bishop of Osnabrück, Heße had written in 2019, “When gay men and lesbian women profess to be faithful Christians despite rejections they experienced, and ask in the Church for pastoral support on their path of life, this is very impressive and challenges to develop perspectives together.”

Their short article was published as the foreword to a book on pastoral work regarding those living in homosexual relationships.

Bishop Georg Bätzing of Limburg presented the working document on Catholic teaching on sexual morality at the assembly of the Synodal Path. Bätzing had chaired the work of the preparatory committee, resulting in the working document discussed in Frankfurt.

Specifically, the bishop said he didn’t want to “break” with Church teaching, but had called for an opening of the sexual morality as proposed by the Church. The bishop hoped for a “widening, opening, and change of that teaching.”

The working document claims, “Homosexual acts also realize positive meaningful values, insofar as they are an expression of friendship, reliability, loyalty and support in life.” Beyond that, the document demands to call homosexual acts no longer an intrinsic evil.

At a discussion event in August 2019, the bishop of Limburg still said that a blessing of homosexual partnerships is impossible. As the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung reported after the event, Bätzing only said, “I cannot do this at the moment.”

He explained, “If Bishop Georg says that there are ceremonies of blessing for homosexuals in Limburg, then tomorrow Bishop Georg will no longer exist because the Holy Father says that the bishop is no longer in union with the Church.”

In April, Bätzing had said at a press conference that he always considered to be a mistake the prohibition of ordaining men with homosexual tendencies to the priesthood.

In 2005, the Congregation for Catholic Education published an instruction concerning the criteria for the discernment of vocations with regard to persons with homosexual tendencies.

The document said of homosexuals, “Such persons, in fact, find themselves in a situation that gravely hinders them from relating correctly to men and women. One must in no way overlook the negative consequences that can derive from the ordination of persons with deep-seated homosexual tendencies.”

At the same time, the instruction made a distinction, acknowledging, “Different, however, would be the case in which one were dealing with homosexual tendencies that were only the expression of a transitory problem – for example, that of an adolescence not yet superseded.” Those tendencies have to be overcome at least three years before the man is ordained a deacon.

Bishop Bätzing is receiving significant backing from one of his priests. Johannes zu Eltz is the main priest in Frankfurt, where the assemblies of the synodal path are taking place, and was nominated as a member of the assembly by the German bishops’ conference.

In an interview, zu Eltz said of conservatives trying to emphasize the importance of the final decision of each individual bishop after the synodal path is completed, “I can well understand these conservative or even reactionary attitudes. I just don’t find them productive.”

He continued, indicating the pressure liberal dioceses could exert on more conservative ones, “With the implementation of good reforms in courageous dioceses, there will be a spirit of new beginnings and salutary pressure. Then the other dioceses will also follow the path.”

Asked about the potential of the Catholic Church being changed into something resembling a Protestant community, zu Eltz declared, “With such labels you can’t frighten me at all. This fixation on demarcation and exclusion is not Catholic. That is the thinking of the new right, it is identitarian. Our horizon is much wider. We have to be able to integrate from the Protestant churches what is good and proven, if it suits us and helps us further. Anything else would be crazy.”

Bishop Heße was selected as a member of the synodal forum on women’s role in the Church, while Bishop Bätzing will still be working as part of the group focused on sexual morality.

At the meetings of the four forums, the goal is to discuss and work out a document that will be presented to the assembly of the synodal path with its 230 members. Only the meetings of the assembly are public.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Moral Issues
KEYWORDS: apostates; francischism; georgbatzing; germans; homos; marx; romancatholic; sinnods; stefanhesse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Vatican Intelligence officer: I am a Freemason and so is Bergoglio
1 posted on 02/05/2020 2:20:06 PM PST by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan; Coleus; DuncanWaring; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; JoeFromSidney; kalee; markomalley; ...

Ping


2 posted on 02/05/2020 2:23:15 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

I see a Great Schism in the near future.........................perhaps the greatest in history.....................


3 posted on 02/05/2020 2:23:24 PM PST by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain.......... ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

God’s way or man’s way. I choose the former.


4 posted on 02/05/2020 2:29:08 PM PST by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FES0844

GOD’S WAY OR THE HIGHWAY.......................


5 posted on 02/05/2020 2:30:45 PM PST by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain.......... ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


6 posted on 02/05/2020 2:38:40 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
Fidelity in pervert relationships. Is that why at any given moment two-thirds of faggots are afflicted with some sort of STD?
7 posted on 02/05/2020 2:47:52 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (The Rats Can't Get Over The Fact That They Lost A Rigged Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide; generally
Vatican intelligence officer: "I am a Freemason and so is Bergoglio"

Duh! Francis, the first black (Jesuit) pope, is a Freemason? Who'da thunk it?   All Jesuits of any advanced stature are Freemasons!

Many in the world would be absolutely astounded to learn the truth that Albert Pike's book, Morals and Dogma, which has for over a century been the handbook par excellence of Freemasonry, makes clear that the Freemasons' god is Lucifer. By the time a Freemason reaches the 33rd degree or beyond, he or she must choose to serve Satan over the One True God and to honor Freemasonry's secrets, on pain of death.

This should make clear that any Freemason on whom has been conferred an advanced degree is duplicitous with respect to any professed faith in God and Jesus. This certainly includes Pope Francis--which is the in-our-faces point the intelligence officer (above) was trying to make--and a large proportion of those in the Vatican. Its corollary is the reason paedophilia has long received a pass among the Powers That Be at the Vatican, which has long been a captured enclave of Jesuit Freemasonry.

With the Father of lights there is no variation or shifting shadow
  --James 1:17

The real reason the "Deep State" vehemently opposes former advanced Freemason-in-good-standing PDJT is that the latter has turned his back on his Jesuit Master, Lucifer and Freemasonry and looks exclusively to Jesus Christ as his Savior. The Deep State is showing its regret that it allowed PDJT to achieve the US presidency.

PDJT has endured assassination attempts (including from MK-Ultra-type crazies) because Freemasons see that--according their oaths and understanding--PDJT deserves death.

8 posted on 02/05/2020 3:08:06 PM PST by rx (Truth will out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

didn’t bootyjudge say he wasn’t monogamous until marriage?


9 posted on 02/05/2020 4:41:40 PM PST by a fool in paradise (We need a tax to stamp out Communism- If you espouse Marxism weÂ’ll redistribute all of your money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
The German 'Catholic' gay advocates and their allies realize that all these arguments about respecting the "positive" in gay relationships, apply to illicit straight relationships as well, meaning stable cohabitation or adulterous second marriages where the first spouse is still alive. They say these pseudo-marriages exhibit fidelity, responsibility, etc. and we should respect that.

That's why the gays have so many hetero "allies". They realize that any argument that finds the "positive aspect" of gay sexual partnering, applies also to illicitly partnered straight people, 100fold.

10 posted on 02/05/2020 5:21:55 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Actually.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

The Church is the transmitter of God’s word, not its creator; it does not have the authority to change church doctrine. For someone to call for change in church teaching is equivalent to denying it, thus it is an act of heresy. If any of these German bishops do not accept church teaching then they should be honest about it and admit that they reject the Catholic faith.


11 posted on 02/05/2020 5:48:52 PM PST by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
The German 'Catholic' gay advocates and their allies realize that all these arguments about respecting the "positive" in gay relationships, apply to illicit straight relationships as well, meaning stable cohabitation or adulterous second marriages where the first spouse is still alive. They say these pseudo-marriages exhibit fidelity, responsibility, etc. and we should respect that.

Portuguese cardinal allows divorced and ‘remarried’ Catholics to receive Communion

12 posted on 02/05/2020 6:42:59 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
The German 'Catholic' gay advocates and their allies realize that all these arguments about respecting the "positive" in gay relationships, apply to illicit straight relationships as well, meaning stable cohabitation or adulterous second marriages where the first spouse is still alive. They say these pseudo-marriages exhibit fidelity, responsibility, etc. and we should respect that.

Would David and Bathsheba been allowed Communion in the RCC?

13 posted on 02/06/2020 1:30:41 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
I realize this is theoretical, or a "supposal"as C.S. Lewis said, but: Yes.

David and Bathsheba could receive Communion on the same grounds as anybody else: if they were licitly married (as they were after the death of Uriah), and if they repented of their sin (which they did), confessed and absolved.

And if they were baptized members of the Catholic Church!

14 posted on 02/06/2020 1:47:02 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("...Created in Christ Jesus for the good works that God has prepared in advance..." (Eph. 2:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I thought Rome said they couldn’t engage in sexual relations without it being adultery?


15 posted on 02/06/2020 2:02:06 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
Bathsheba's husband was dead, duh. Murdered, which makes it all filthy dishonorable; but their marriage would not be considered null for reason of a still-living previous spouse, because her husband was not still living.

But come to think of it, there's the matter of David's polygamy. His first wife, Michal, the daughter of King Saul, would be considered (by Catholic standards) David's one-and-only wife, but the Bible lists by name 8 women who were David's all-at-the-same-time wives, plus there were more.

So you've stumped me. The Catholic Church does not admit polygamists to Communion. This sort of obviates any further meaningful discussion at this point.

16 posted on 02/06/2020 2:10:58 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("...Created in Christ Jesus for the good works that God has prepared in advance..." (Eph. 2:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
In other words, Rome would not allow any of the OT people we read about to have communion.

Abraham

Solomon

David, etc.

17 posted on 02/06/2020 2:15:10 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
I'm surprised you want to pursue this point. As I said, trying to transpose matters from 4,000 years to the present day, with the contrasting manners and morals--- it's hard to produce a meaningful discussion at this point.

But to turn the question back for your own point of view: would your own church, where you worship, admit as a member, an unbaptized man who had 12 sons by 2 wives and 2 concubines, with whom he was presently cohabiting simultaneously?

Or a man who had 700 wives who were princesses,and 300 concubines?

I can just imagine the church elders discussing this...

18 posted on 02/06/2020 2:33:52 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Dubious dooby-doo-o-o-o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

God admitted them to Heaven did He not?


19 posted on 02/06/2020 2:49:15 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Oh, of course! There’s no question of that! But that’s not what you asked me, or what I asked you.


20 posted on 02/06/2020 5:29:04 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Dubious dooby-doo-o-o-o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson