Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was St. Paul a Poor Preacher?
Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 07-31-19 | Msgr. Charles Pope

Posted on 08/01/2019 9:03:46 AM PDT by Salvation

Posted on July 31, 2019July 31, 2019 by Msgr. Charles Pope

Was St. Paul a Poor Preacher?

For many years, the image I had of St. Paul was that of a bold evangelist who went from town to town teaching and preaching powerfully about Christ. I envisioned his audience mesmerized as he preached and took on his opponents.

I ultimately altered my view a bit based on scriptural descriptions, some of which we are currently reading in the Office of Readings. I have no doubt that he was a brilliant theologian. Paul was reputed to have been one of the greatest students of one of the greatest rabbis of the time, Gamaliel (Acts 22:3). I also do not question his zeal for Christ, and I can picture that fervor reflected on his face as he preached and taught. However, it would seem that Paul was not in fact recognized as a particularly gifted preacher. Consider the following texts from Scripture:

The key element to glean from this passage is that people regarded Paul as rather humble in person but in contrast quite bold and assertive in his letters. This does not paint the picture of a bold, fearsome preacher.

Here is even clearer evidence that some (though surely not all or even most) thought of Paul’s presence and preaching as weak and of no account. The Greek phrase λόγος ἐξουθενημένος (logos exouthenhmenos), translated here as “speech contemptible,” can also be translated as “words or speech of no account,” or “words or speech to be despised.” Of course, because Paul himself is reporting this, he may well be exaggerating the perception of his preaching out of a kind of humility. However, this is further evidence that Paul may not have been a highly gifted or bold preacher, at least from a worldly perspective.

The identity of the “superapostles” is debated, but there is wide agreement that it does not refer to the twelve apostles chosen by Christ. Rather, Paul is likely alluding to itinerant preachers of the time, most of whom were well known for their oratorical skills. Some of them may have been Judaizers who opposed Paul, but it would seem that they could draw a crowd. Perhaps they are somewhat like the revivalists of today. Paul seems to acknowledge that he is not a great speaker but refuses to concede that he is inferior to anyone in knowledge of the faith.

Paul claims no “clever” oratorical skill; rather, he underscores his lack of eloquence to emphasize that the power is in the cross of Christ.

Luke describes Paul as talking “on and on.” The sermon seems to have put the young Eutychus right to sleep, and results in his falling three flights to his death. Paul runs down and raises him from the dead. (All in a night’s work, I guess!) Paul then goes back upstairs to complete the Mass. It is a humorous and touching anecdote in many ways, but it is also a story that illustrates the somewhat soporific effect of Paul’s preaching.

So, it would seem that Paul did not possess great oratorical. This is somewhat surprising given his astonishing missionary accomplishments, but we must avoid superficiality in understanding the power of God’s Word. The power is in God; the battle is His. We may prefer to listen to skilled speakers, but God can write straight with crooked lines and make a way out of no way. If God could speak through Balaam’s donkey (see Num 22:21), He can speak through us, too.

Avoiding Superficiality – As a priest, I work hard to develop my preaching skills because I think the people of God deserve this. In the end, though, none of us should ignore the fact that God can speak in and through the humblest of people and in the most unlikely circumstances. Paul may not have had the rhetorical skills we think he should have had, but he was blessed with many other gifts. He was a brilliant theologian, had amazing zeal and energy, and was committed enough to walk thousands of miles and endure horrible sufferings so that he could proclaim Christ crucified and risen. Paul was also a natural leader and one of the most fruitful evangelizers the Church has ever known. We tend to prize oratorical skill and force of personality, but there is obviously more to evangelizing effectively than eloquence and charisma.

Our culture—particularly since the advent of television, radio, and the Internet—has come to focus primarily on personal magnetism and the ability to “turn a phrase.” The ability to communicate well is surely a great gift, but there are many others as well. In valuing certain gifts over others, we risk injustice and superficiality. The Church needs all our gifts.

What gifts do you have? God can use them!


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: apostlepaul; catholic; holybible; newtestament; theology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last
Video
1 posted on 08/01/2019 9:03:46 AM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; ArrogantBustard; Catholicguy; RobbyS; marshmallow; ...

Monsignor Pope Ping!


2 posted on 08/01/2019 9:04:49 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
The sermon seems to have put the young Eutychus right to sleep, and results in his falling three flights to his death. Paul runs down and raises him from the dead. (All in a night’s work, I guess!)

That's funny, right there!

What gifts do you have? God can use them!

My wife and kids would certainly attest that I

can talk just about anyone unconscious.

7

3 posted on 08/01/2019 9:16:47 AM PDT by infool7 (Observe, Orient, Pray, Decide, Act!(it's an OOPDA loop))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

“Paul then goes back upstairs to complete the Mass.” What is that I am always reading from FR Catholics about opinion sneaking in as if evidentiary thus not valid? The passage says Paul broke bread. PERIOD.


4 posted on 08/01/2019 10:40:26 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Which ‘church’ does the writer refer to, the body of all believers since Pentecost, or the Catholic Org?


5 posted on 08/01/2019 10:43:59 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

define poor


6 posted on 08/01/2019 10:45:34 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Paul is much taken for granted because in this age he is thought
to be the super apostle, however any one who reads what he says
can see it the way it was.

2 tim. 1:15 Paul tells Timothy that those in Asis had forsaken him
meaning left his teaching.

1 Corinthians 9:2
If I am not an apostle to others, probably meaning the churches in
Asia.

Paul was also having problems with the church at galatia which was his
Purpose for writing them, he was plainly putting the other apostles down.


7 posted on 08/01/2019 11:07:12 AM PDT by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

He was a slow learner.


8 posted on 08/01/2019 11:14:43 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
"The passage says Paul broke bread. PERIOD."

The "breaking of bread" IS the Mass, PERIOD. The problem with Protestants is they don't believe the Bible, despite their constant "protestation" that it is the whole basis of their worship.

9 posted on 08/01/2019 12:31:46 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

So when Jesus broke bread with his Apostles he was performing a Mass as the Catholic Church does.

Pretty impossible as Peter who was the first “Pope” was one of the Apostles yet I cannot find any reference in any scripture of the rituals of this church being mandated or performed other than by their members post the creation of it.


10 posted on 08/01/2019 12:40:50 PM PDT by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 100American
"Pretty impossible as Peter who was the first “Pope” was one of the Apostles yet I cannot find any reference in any scripture of the rituals of this church being mandated or performed other than by their members post the creation of it."

Which is why "Sola Scriptura" is invalid. The record of the early Church Fathers is completely clear on the origin and practice of the Mass from the very earliest historical records we have. "I can't find it in Scripture" is a complete copout.

11 posted on 08/01/2019 3:56:51 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Wonder Warthog

The breaking of bread and sharing of wine (Body & Blood) at the Passover Feast (Seder) is in scripture indeed, and that is where the practice starts just before the Crucifixion


13 posted on 08/01/2019 4:17:22 PM PDT by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 100American; MHGinTN
Martin Luther, the founder of Protestantism, believed in the Real Presence. He didn’t want to speculate about metaphysics and how the bread and wine became the Body and Blood of Christ, but simply believed in the miracle of the literal presence of Jesus’ Body and Blood “alongside” the bread and wine (consubstantiation). Luther wrote:“Sooner than have mere wine with the fanatics, I would agree with the pope that there is only blood. (Confession Concerning Christ’s Supper, 1528)He rebuked the symbolic view of the Eucharist, held by the majority of Protestants today:“[S]ince we are confronted by God’s words, ‘This is my body’ – distinct, clear, common, definite words, which certainly are no trope, either in Scripture or in any language — we must embrace them with faith … not as hairsplitting sophistry dictates but as God says them for us, we must repeat these words after him and hold to them” (Ibid.).

Luther’s defense of the Real Presence in the Eucharist

14 posted on 08/01/2019 4:29:52 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
Read about Justin Martyr in the book Four Witnesses
15 posted on 08/01/2019 4:31:04 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 100American

Indeed it is. But there is also post-scriptural evidence as well. Protestants believe neither. The whole reason for the establishment of the diaconate was to allow the Apostles (and their ordained successors) more time for the Mass.


16 posted on 08/01/2019 4:38:00 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
"Run along and seek some other issue over which you can insult someone. The CATHOLIC Mass is an abomination violating in spirit the command from God, even before the Mosaic law, to not eat the blood."

God changed things in the New Covenant....that's why it is "New". He can do that. Scripture is VERY clear on this, in words given by Christ himself. "If you do not eat the Flesh of the Son of Man, and drink His Blood, you do not have life within you."

"That same admonition was repeated by the first Great Ekklesia Council in their letter to the new believers.

I suspect this "admonition" refers to sacrifices to idols and has nothing to do with the Mass. Let's see your quote from said Council.

17 posted on 08/01/2019 4:44:43 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

I am as you call me a “Protestant” but I claim no religion even as an ordained minister, but of Faith. The only “church” mentioned in scripture is The Body of Christ

We can go on over this if you like, but I choose to help souls not stand on a contruct that all other churches other than the Catholic Church are false

I know exactly what and Why Yeshua performed this and Communion with him is a sacred act. I attended a service at a Roman Catholic Church in my early teens and I had been taking communion for years but was refused even though it was Easter Sunday as I was not a “member”. I am a member of God’s family and you have no authority otherwise to deny it to me, if it means I am not a member of your religion so be it


18 posted on 08/01/2019 4:47:49 PM PDT by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Read about Justin Martyr in the book Four Witnesses.

Better...just read Justin.

Or better....read Scripture.

19 posted on 08/01/2019 5:03:23 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 100American
I am as you call me a “Protestant” but I claim no religion even as an ordained minister,...

Who ordained you, if you claim no religion? A burning bush?

20 posted on 08/01/2019 5:05:04 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson