“Paul then goes back upstairs to complete the Mass.” What is that I am always reading from FR Catholics about opinion sneaking in as if evidentiary thus not valid? The passage says Paul broke bread. PERIOD.
The "breaking of bread" IS the Mass, PERIOD. The problem with Protestants is they don't believe the Bible, despite their constant "protestation" that it is the whole basis of their worship.
Notice also....it is not called the “Mass” or any of the other RC names they use for the Lord’s Supper.
Indeed, and thus we both have an attack on Paul as a preacher as well as an attempt to convert him into being a Catholic priest, which separate sacerdotal class simply did not exist in the NT church .
Wait, Paul was a Catholic priest performing mass?
I’ve been assured here in the past that Paul was a nut, probably suffering from epileptic seizures instead of having visions from God. In fact, there was a fairly sizable faction here on FR at one time that called all Protestants “Paulistinians” and claimed that Protestants were not Christian.
So, what gives? I just can’t seem to keep up with the Roman spin on things. Just constant flapdoodle, if it’s not hating Martin Luther it’s turning right around and loving him because he said something vaguely RC-sounding.
It makes no sense.