Posted on 07/25/2019 9:39:25 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
NEW YORK CITY, August 3, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) Pope Francis has directly contradicted the perennial teaching of the Church, a U.S. canon lawyer said on an EWTN show last night.
Canonist Father Gerald Murray and writer Robert Royal, known to EWTN audiences as the Papal Posse, discussed Pope Francis change to catechetical teachings on the death penalty with host Raymond Arroyo on his The World Over show.
Calling the Popes innovation a bombshell, Arroyo contrasted the Old Teaching which allowed for capital punishment in the very rare, if not practically non-existent circumstances when it was absolutely necessary with the New Teaching that the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person.
Murray told Arroyo that the Popes action was very troubling because it went against Church doctrine.
...He is directly contradicting the perennial teaching of the Church on the morality of the death penalty, the priest said. It was once considered moral, perfectly good, in fact, something that was in accord with Divine revelation.
Robert Royal wondered why Pope Francis new teaching was necessary. He observed that Pope John Paul II had already promulgated the idea that the reasons for capital punishment are practically non-existent.
That I think is about as far as you can go as a pope in talking about this, Royal said.
Murray said he had difficulty understanding why Pope Francis said that to execute a person guilty of a serious crime violated the dignity of the human person.
We have an ontological dignity as created by God, he stated. We have a supernatural dignity as baptized persons. And the dignity of the human being adheres in him. He cannot lose his dignity no matter what other people do to him, or even what he does to himself.
Violating human dignity means violating Gods law because human dignity comes from God.
Nevertheless, the human person can certainly lose the exercise of certain rights, Murray believes, which is why there is incarceration and any punishment for crime at all.
The priest believes that the Church was right to permit capital punishment in the past, and he does not believe Pope Francis can say that she wasnt.
To say that the Catholic Church violated the dignity of people until now by saying that it was moral for certain criminals to be executed, I have a great problem in accepting that, Murray said. I do not believe that the teaching of the Church up to this moment is immoral, and I dont think the pope has the power to change that teaching.
His job as pope is to preserve and uphold the doctrine of the faith, not to rewrite it.
Robert Royal concurred that the pope cant change doctrine, saying It seems to me that this goes beyond his proper authority.
He agreed with Arroyo that sometimes the death penalty is a practical necessity, not only in developing countries, where an expensive prison system is an injustice to poor and even starving populations, but in the USA, in light of recent murders of correction officers by inmates.
Its an awful thing to kill another human being, but occasionally it has to happen, Royal said. Police have to do this. People in warfare have to do this
He suggested that Pope Francis is sentimental in his approach to the question of human dignity, and Gerald Murray later pointed out that human dignity includes everyone else, including murder victims. Human dignity is not about evading just punishment.
In fact, said Royal, it is one expression of respecting a persons human dignity to hold them responsible when they do a terrible thing.
Murray said that the question of any punishment had come up, especially as there is at least one much more serious penalty than capital punishment.
Is it an offence against human dignity for God to damn someone to hell? he asked. We say no. If someone is deserving of eternal punishment in hell, then that is in accordance with the divine will, and thats a good thing.
Raymond Arroyo cited the late Cardinal Avery Dulles, an authority on the licitness of the death penalty, saying that capital punishment can be merciful, as the knowledge of impending death can bring the condemned into a state of redemption.
Asked if Pope Francis change to doctrine was an evolution or a break, both Royal and Murray said it was a break. Royal also noted that Francis has also spoken out against life imprisonment and even the eternal punishment of the damned.
Murray disagreed with Cardinal Ladarias claims that Francis change to the catechism was in continuity with doctrine.
You cant go from saying it is moral for the state to execute certain criminals to saying it is immoral for the state to execute certain criminals, he stated. You cant say thats a development. Thats an overthrow, and thats a change.
He said he found it worrying because the death penalty was a particular target of liberals, and liberals have a lot of targets besides it, including Catholic teachings on marriage and sexuality.
Are all of those things going to be subject to an evolving societal understanding? he wondered.
Royal agreed that to change teaching on life and death would have incalculable consequences in all sort of different areas.
LGBT Catholic groups have already put forward the position that if the Pope can reverse Church teaching on the death penalty, then he should be able to do the same for homosexuality.
https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2018/12/18/pope-francis-new-comments-on-the-death-penalty-are-incoherent-and-dangerous/
Pope Francis new comments on the death penalty are incoherent and dangerous
Pope Francis is incoherent and dangerous.
But just like the US survived obama, the Catholic Church will survive the fraud.
Just keep praying everyone.
The Bible is all we need to know what is right and what is wrong.
Every worthless liberal member of the USCCB needs to read what real Catholics, with a real knowledge of the 2000 year teachings of the church on the death penalty thinks about the fraud pope changing what is not in his authority to change.
This Pope sucks in every way it is possible for a Pope to suck. Always.
The old (rare) and new (never) positions agree in 99% of the possible cases; and governments will keep on doing what governments have been keeping on doing. I think we need to address starker problems first, as well as to leverage the “human dignity” argument to reach into all manner of other affairs. If we lost capital punishment but also put a firm stop to abortion, would it be worth it? I’d say yes.
Suprised that PF did not comment about the USA fed government restoration of the death penalty this week.
Think this has anything to do with Barr announcing that the US Govt. is re-instituting the death penalty?
Think of President Trump’s executive order on human trafficking, and this tweet of his: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/255294883680632833
Ann Barnhardt is gonna have a whole *herd* of cows.
Another word for break is schism.
And it’s happening.
The Bible is all we need to know what is right and what is wrong.
..........................................
Not sure who you are including in “we”, but since their are countless contradicting Biblical interpretations there are apparently countless people who need more than the Bible to know what is right and what is wrong. One example should suffice: there are many so-called “Sola Scriptura” Christians who believe it is right to kill babies both before and after their birth!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.