Posted on 05/01/2019 6:05:23 AM PDT by ebb tide
On the eve of the 2013 conclave, Cardinal Óscar Rodríguez Maradiaga busily phoned cardinal voters from the Honduran embassy in Rome. He was one of the conclave’s key kingmakers—and he was vigorously promoting then-Cardinal Bergoglio for pope.
That same day, Maradiaga attended a private meeting of Bergoglio supporters, including key revolutionaries from the St. Gallen mafia. Together, they tallied at least twenty-five votes for Bergoglio—who later opened, notably, with twenty-six. On the conclave’s second day, Maradiaga was back at work, shooting down a rival group’s lunchtime rumor that Bergoglio had only one lung. Four days later, the newly elected Pope Francis asked Maradiaga to head his powerful new Council of Cardinals.
Six years later, the pope and his “vice pope” are both accused of perpetuating “one of the worst crises in the history of the Catholic Church.” A new open letter addressed to the bishops of the Church accuses Pope Francis of being “guilty of the crime of heresy” and says “a heretical papacy may not be tolerated or dissimulated to avoid a worse evil.” The authors, many of whom are prominent priests and scholars, argue that Francis has now “publicly and pertinaciously” demonstrated belief in seven “interconnected” heresies—including one that legitimizes “many kinds of sexual activity outside of marriage.”
The 20-page letter asserts a crucial “link” between the pope’s “rejection of Catholic teaching” and his “protection and promotion” of dissident and immoral clerics. As the authors continue:Canon law has traditionally considered that protecting, promoting and helping heretics can itself be evidence of heresy… By choosing heretical prelates for the most important posts in the Roman Curia, [Pope Francis] manifests an intention to impose these heresies upon the whole Church. By protecting clerics who are guilty of immoral and criminal sexual acts even when this protection causes grave scandal to the Church and threatens to lead to calamitous action by the civil authorities, he manifests disbelief in Catholic teaching on sexual morality…
The pope’s words and actions, the authors say, “amount to a comprehensive rejection of Catholic teaching on marriage and sexual activity, on the moral law, and on grace and the forgiveness of sins.”
Affirming that Amoris Laetitia allows Communion for adulterers; claiming that conscience can discern that God is “asking” one to break the sixth commandment (AL 303); naming Cardinal Danneels to the family synod even though he protected a pedophile; favoring Cardinal Coccopalmerio despite his call to emphasize the “positive elements” in homosexual relationships; promoting a cleric who reportedly got “trapped in an elevator with a male prostitute”—all these words and actions of Pope Francis (and more) are marshaled as evidence against him. In particular, the authors note that “Pope Francis has protected and promoted homosexually active clerics and clerical apologists for homosexual activity. This indicates that he believes that homosexual activity is not gravely sinful.”
As one part of its voluminous evidence, the letter cites the papal favor enjoyed by Maradiaga, a revolutionary accused of fiercely covering up for a protégé bishop, Juan José Pineda Fasquelle. Pineda ultimately resigned amidst allegations that he sexually abused seminarians and embezzled over $1.3 million to “pay for sexual favors” and “maintain a network” of homosexual lovers. According to Martha Alegría Reichmann’s Sacred Betrayals, Maradiaga ferociously ruined the careers of at least six priests who spoke out against Pineda. She claims that the Vatican then “maneuvered so that Maradiaga would not be officially implicated as Pineda’s concealer.”
Maradiaga has also attacked seminarians reporting homosexual misconduct and downplayed the gravity of Theodore McCarrick’s homosexual predation on seminarians. According to Archbishop Viganò, both men were behind the meteoric rise of Cardinal Cupich, a top revolutionary on homosexuality. Maradiaga has himself repeatedly pushed for groundbreaking “pastoral care” for those in same-sex relationships.
Despite the scandals surrounding him, Maradiaga was recently in the media hailing a curial reform document that he helped draft. The overhaul will, reportedly, downgrade the CDF—five years after Maradiaga loudly rebuked the CDF’s then-head, Cardinal Müller, for defending the Church’s ban on Communion for adulterers. According to Paul Vallely, that high-charged clash between Müller and the vice pope signified that the CDF “was supreme no more.” Now, any further downgrading of the CDF—critics fear—could pave the way for doctrinal and moral “anarchy.”
Like an emissary of entropy, Maradiaga has knowingly courted that chaos. In a 2013 blueprint for this pontificate, Maradiaga glowingly announced that Vatican II “meant an end to the hostilities between the Church and Modernism, which was condemned in the First Vatican Council.” It was an astonishing admission from the vice pope himself: this pontificate would promote pacific accommodation with the super-heresy of Modernism. Indeed—as one signatory of the 2017 filial correction soon warned—Amoris Laetitia’s underlying premises expose the revolutionaries’ Modernist view “that doctrine is basically changeable.”
Another signatory of the 2017 filial correction, Roberto de Mattei, once described an ominous “new wind” blowing in our times: “Instead of construction there is destruction. Instead of rebuilding there is demolition.” He was speaking broadly of the “nihilism” of “the new left,” but his diagnosis hauntingly fits the Church’s hardcore revolutionaries, intent on burning down the Church’s moral tradition like “spiritual arsonists.” Blazing moral anarchy—that is what the St. Gallen mafia and its allies plotted to ignite under this pontificate.
In “so grave and unprecedented an emergency,” the authors of the open letter write:
We … request that you take the steps necessary to deal with the grave situation of a
heretical pope. We take this measure as a last resort to respond to the accumulating harm caused by Pope Francis’s words and actions over several years, which have given rise to one of the worst crises in the history of the Catholic Church.
[We] believe that it will no longer suffice to teach the truth as it were abstractly, or even to deprecate “confusion” in the Church in rather general terms. For Catholics will hardly believe that the pope is attacking the faith unless this be said expressly; and hence, merely abstract denunciations risk providing a cover for Pope Francis to advance and to achieve his goal.
[We appeal to you] publicly to admonish Pope Francis to abjure the heresies that he has professed… If—which God forbid!—Pope Francis does not bear the fruit of true repentance in response to these admonitions, we request that you carry out your duty of office to declare that he has committed the canonical delict of heresy and that he must suffer the canonical consequences of this crime.
It is an extraordinarily grave request, but it must be assessed in the context of the revolutionaries’ iron-fisted will to irrevocably alter the Church. As Maradiaga himself said in 2015: “The pope wants to take this Church renovation to the point where it becomes irreversible.”
Ping
Hoping and praying that this brave letter is going to finally set off the rebellion against an evil man who is probably the first fully heretical pope we have ever had.
We’ve had bad popes (inefficient), immoral but good popes (meaning, lousy personal lives but orthodox and effective and they probably repented on their deathbeds), and clueless popes who may have stated or stumbled into a somewhat arcane heresy, but we’ve never had a full-blown “the Church c’est Moi” pope before. That is, somebody who thinks his every flaky opinion, no matter how much it conflicts with 2000 years of Church teaching, is doctrine.
It’s about time. Can’t understand why it hasn’t happened sooner..Hope it gets some traction.
There’s a good book “Conclave” by Robert Harris that covers the few days of choosing and voting for a new pope AND THE POLITICS of the whole procedure - fiction but very interesting.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/29397486-conclave
Please add me to your ping list.
Thanks,
nanetteclaret
“The pope wants to take this Church renovation to the point where it becomes irreversible.”
Fundamentally transforming the Catholic church. Somebody else used similar words.
Now, some have called Pope Francis the AntiChrist. That may be extreme, but he could be a lesser demonic operative. If he starts to actually TEACH against the Church, not just throw out stupid, off-the-cuff remarks, THEN that would really put to the TEST the ancient Catholic doctrine of Papal Infallibility. Unless, of course, he is not really the Pope, such as if his basic ordination as a Priest was faked so long ago.
I’m only surprised bergoglio has not heretofore dispatched Benedict. ...And Sarah.
Not over yet though.
I’m not up on the latest in the Roman Catholic hierarchy, so a term in this article confuses me.
The article refers to Maradiaga as “vice pope”.
Does it just mean that he’s chief of staff and chief interference-runner? Or does it mean that he in charge of the pederasts who infect the hierarchy in Rome? Or, does it mean that he’s the point of contact for deflecting criminal prosecutions by secular vice squads and criticism by traditional Catholic vice squads?
Or, is “vice pope” a double entendre?
And they serve the same master.
Sarah's term of office is up later this year (I think in November). It's expected that Francis won't keep him on for an additional term.
It's kind of a nickname that people have given to Maradiaga because of his closeness with Francis. It really has no specific meaning, but I like your suggestion of it being a double-entendre, since it would certainly fit. ;-)
touché
I’ve never believed Bergolio is the Pope. There were way too many shenanigans over the resignation of Benedict XVI and the push by the St. Gallan Mafia during the conclave, which was illegal according to conclave rules. Benedict XVI is and always will be my Holy Father, until the Lord takes him. I pray daily for the conversion of Bergolio to the True Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Faith.
The answer to the old joke, “Is the (so-called) Pope Catholic?” is “No, actually he’s not.”
You mentioned Bergolio actually teaching against the Church. He has already done that with Amoris Laetitia and his letter to the Argentine Bishops stating their interpretation is the correct and only one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.