Posted on 03/08/2019 7:05:50 AM PST by SeekAndFind
I lived in the Bible Belt when I was an atheist. Was I discriminated against? I don't know. Maybe. I do know that the service industry jobs I applied for were always happy that I was willing to work on Sundays. Discrimination was a term I never thought about in regards to myself. I guess I was more self-sufficient and confident than today's atheists. Definitely more so than those who live in Portland, Oregon. Apparently, the 42 percent of Portland residents who identify as atheist, agnostic, or a religious "none" have been suffering under a great wave of persecution in their city, because Portland has passed an ordinance protecting their rights.
Portland City Commissioner Amanda Fritz submitted the ordinance for consideration early in February. It has since been passed unanimously and will go into force starting on March 29. The Portland Tribune reports that Cheryl Kolbe, president of the Portland chapter of the Freedom from Religion Foundation, speaking from Commissioner Fritz's office, exclaimed:
This change says that Portland chooses to make certain that non-believers receive the same protection from discrimination as those in any form of religion. This is very affirming for those of us who are atheist, agnostic or any other form of non-belief. It is the right thing to do.
Setting aside the absurd notion that atheists and those who claim to be religious nones are being persecuted in Portland, of all places, where they make up the largest identity group by percentage, it's helpful to ask what rights this ordinance protects? I mean, I don't live in Portland. I live in Arlington, Va., which is not exactly a friendly place for conservative Christians. Yet, if I were to be punched in the face because of my religious beliefs, my assailant would be arrested (ask the leftist dude in Berkeley how punching a conservative has worked out for him). If I were to find myself on the receiving end of verbal abuse, I would have legal recourse to shut it down. Not to mention that most people wouldn't stand for it. If the roles were reversed and I punched an atheist in the face, I would be arrested, even if I had committed the assault in the Bible Belt. Laws already exist that are intended to keep citizens from harassing and assaulting each other.
However, the Portland Tribune points out that "Polls consistently show that many Americans do not trust and would not elect an atheist as President, nor believe they should have the opportunity to teach in public school."
Okay. For one thing, I'm fairly confident that the vast majority of leftists would refuse to vote for me for POTUS solely because I am a conservative Christian a Southern Baptist, to boot! And I do not feel the least bit discriminated against. Going a step further, I would be appalled if people were required to ignore my religious affiliation if I were to run for public office. Private individuals should have the right to support or reject candidates based on their own values. Not to mention that ordinances like the one that was just passed in Portland (and the first one that was passed in Madison, Wisc.) cannot control people when they step into the voting booth. I mean, there are ways to effectively police people's thoughts, but I would highly discourage our society from treading down that path.
“Atheist Mecca”
I see what happened there...
How about:
“A California congresswoman wants to federalize a state law to prohibit counseling to change a persons sexual orientation, including that of pedophiles.
If you would like more information about what's happening in Oregon, please FReepmail me.
42% isn’t a majority.
Protected huh? All these declarations will mean squat when the SHTF.
Is that just a joke or is that for real?
Fox News: “Portland gives atheists civil rights protections against discrimination”
This should make you even more puzzled.
California: “California as SB1172. Speier’s bill is designed to prohibit counseling to change a person’s sexual orientation.”
“When the law was passed in California, Republicans did attempt to add an amendment specifying that pedophilia is not covered as an orientation, but the Democrats defeated the amendment.”
Frankly I honestly think there is little point to therapy on a proven pedophile. I dont think this is a population you can trust. There would be a chance of helping someone who sincerely went to therapy because he felt drawn to kids and fantasies, who had never done anything and did not want to, wanted to prevent anything.
It is now official: the democrats are the party of perversion.
It is way past time for observant Christians and Jews to get out of California — because a hard rain is gonna fall.
Genesis 19 writ large.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.