Posted on 01/24/2019 9:27:21 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Religion in the United States is in a slump. Since 1990, the share of Americans who reject any religious affiliation has climbed sharply, from 8 percent to more than 22 percent. Among younger Americans, the trend is especially pronounced. According to the Public Religion Research Institute, 38 percent of Americans under 30 describe themselves as having no religious identity.
If present trends continue, these "nones" will outnumber Catholics by 2020, and will be more numerous than Protestants by 2035.
Of course, present trends may not continue. There have been at least three "Great Awakenings" — periods of dramatic religious revival — in American history. Maybe another such awakening will materialize down the road. For now, however, there is no doubt that the United States is becoming less religious. As the Pew Research Center has documented, fewer Americans believe in God, pray regularly, or consider religion very important in their lives.
CARTOONS | STEVE KELLEY VIEW CARTOON Many Americans aren't just turning from religion, but against religion. In 2016, Pew found that only 58 percent of US adults believed that "churches, synagogues, and other houses of worship" contribute at least in part to solving important social problems. Fully 39 percent said that they contribute little or nothing to alleviating social ills. Other surveys have found that Americans are evenly split on whether religion is part of the solution to what ails America — or part of the problem.
This shift in attitude should worry all Americans, believers and nonbelievers alike. Because religious faith and institutions, whatever else might be said about them, are the strongest drivers of philanthropic works in US society. If religion in this country is going down, charitable giving and volunteering are likely to go down too.
"Religious practice links us in webs of mutual knowledge, responsibility, and support like no other influence," writes Karl Zinsmeister in the current issue of the journal Philanthropy. Zinsmeister, the editor of the Almanac of American Philanthropy, notes that numerous studies have confirmed that "religious practice is the behavioral variable with the strongest and most consistent association with generous giving." Researchers at Indiana University's Lilly School of Philanthropy reported in October that the average annual contribution of religiously unaffiliated households is $695, less than half the $1,590 given by the average household with a religious affiliation. Regular churchgoers are also much more likely to do donate their time: According to Pew, 45 percent of them had done volunteer work within the past seven days. The comparable figure for all other Americans was 27 percent.
"The capacity of religion to motivate pro-social behavior goes way beyond volunteering," Zinsmeister observes. "Religious people are more involved in community groups [and] have stronger links with their neighbors." They are more likely to adopt children, to resettle refugees, to rehabilitate prisoners, and to help the homeless.
They're also concerned with helping the needy far away. Religious-affiliated humanitarian organizations, such as World Vision, the Catholic Medical Mission Board, and the American Jewish World Service, collectively distribute tens of billions of dollars annually to relieve poverty, disease, and suffering in the developing world. Private giving to assist the overseas poor now totals $44 billion per year — far outstripping the $33 billion in humanitarian aid provided by the US government.
All of which indicates why a decline in religious ties is ominous for reasons having nothing to do with theology.
America has always been extraordinarily charitable. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn described the United States as "the most magnanimous, the most generous country in the world." But that generosity has been disproportionately linked to faith. As faith shrinks, charity — and the good works charity sustains — will take a hit.
Already there are signs that this is happening. Between 2000 and 2014, Nonprofit Quarterly recently documented, the share of households donating to charity fell from 66 percent to 55.5 percent. Volunteering is down, too. In 2015, according to the University of Maryland's Do Good Institute, the proportion of Americans doing volunteer work dropped to 24.9 percent — a 15-year low. So far the raw total of dollars donated remains at record levels, but that is because wealthy donors are giving more.
To be sure, charitable giving is not the only means of doing good in the world. Religious faith is not the only way to imbue existence with meaning. But both have been singularly characteristic of the American way of life — and closely connected to each other. Less religion in the nation's future may not trouble many Americans. But how many of us want to live in a less generous America?
A more divided America is a much less generous America.
I’m not inclined to donate to people and causes that hate me.
Liberals, socialists and communists don’t like charity. It takes away their role confiscating and redistributing - and then taking credit.
That’s the problem with Atheism. Do atheists really believe a world without any religion would be an improvement?
“I’m not inclined to donate to people and causes that hate me.”
Exactly. I’m so, SO tired of being called names by Liberals, but I am equally disgusted by the creeping Socialism in so many churches these days.
My charitable donations go directly from ME to causes I believe in; they no longer go through a church or some other ‘organization.’
This site is very helpful:
http://www.charitynavigator.org
No it won’t. We’ll become a collectivist nation under an oppressive government that will force us to be more “giving”— to the obscene causes the government chooses to support.
The pagan left is quite generous - as long as it’s with someone else’s money.
But how many of us want to live in a less generous America?
________________________________________________________
But you don’t need more generous individuals if government is ripe with wealth redistribution policies. That’s the problem with the author’s article. Material generosity is a by-product of some religions, but that can be achieved without religion. And that’s why it’s easy for some faiths (from my own experience, Catholicism comes to mind) to begin substituting charity work for insistence on personal holiness. “Preference for the poor” is the term used in homilies to drive home a focus on material improvement without much emphasis on spiritual conversion and personal transformation. The logical conclusion of such a message is that the spiritual message of Christianity is superfluous. Thus, we have secular humanism (which is really synonymous with atheistic socialism) attempting to replace theism. Whether that can actually be pulled off for any great length of time is yet to be seen. Even in Europe, where they are considerably more secular than here, they must depend greatly on foreign immigrant labor and foreign military support (mainly from the U.S.) to continue to exist. If those were withdrawn, I don’t things would have to change culturally or degeneration and/or foreign conquest would eventually follow.
Article is spot-on.
It will be a much meaner, nastier place with weaker churches and fewer Christians around.
Welcome to the world you helped create, Liberals.
They want generosity lessened. Christian Charity is generous. That is voluntary.
They want compulsory government welfare to replace it. Destroying generosity abets that goal.
Our system of government was predicated on a largely Christian citizenry. Without that, this nation has a bleak fate.
The problem with that comparison is that a large portion of the donations made by the religious are the direct result of solicitations from their religious organizations which then use that money in large part to fund the raw operating cost of the church; building maintenance, electricity, heat, clergy and staff salaries, etc. If you don't see the world in religious terms, then you won't see those expenses as producing beneficial outcomes to the larger community. If you don't see the value in religion, then there is no point in paying a priest or maintaining a building's roof.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.