Posted on 08/09/2018 7:56:51 PM PDT by ebb tide
VATICAN CITY, August 7, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) Those who criticize the teaching of Pope Francis on the basis of former magisterial documents are not faithful to the tradition of the Catholic Church, a high-ranking Vatican official has said.
In an interview with Vatican News, to mark the 25th anniversary of the promulgation of Veritatis Splendor Pope John Paul IIs 1993 landmark encyclical on certain fundamentals of the Catholic Churchs moral teaching Archbishop Rino Fisichella, president of the Pontifical Council for the New Evangelization, said there is no foothold for challenging the magisterium of Pope Francis in the light of the previous magisterium.
Asked about sectors of the Church who criticize Pope Francis for depart[ing] from Catholic doctrine and who often point to Veritatis Splendor as the basis for their criticism Fisichella said he believes one should never use the magisterium as an instrument to dispute the development of doctrine.
When it is used as an instrument, then I fear there is no desire to discover the truth, and also no fidelity to the tradition of the Church, he added, asserting that instead, we must reiterate how much continuity there is in the development.
The Italian archbishop also said he believes it is important to read carefully all of Pope Francis teaching and not just some of his interviews. A mosaic is revealed by the whole set of tiles, not just one tile, he said, adding that the mosaic of the current pontificate displays a great openness in the work of Evangelization, of not putting the norm before proclamation.
Archbishop Fisichella is perhaps best known to pro-life advocates for an article he wrote for LOsservatore Romano in 2009 criticizing a local bishop and seeming to support the actions of Brazilian abortionists who aborted the twins of a sexually abused girl. Pope Benedict XVI removed Fisichella as the head of the Pontifical Academy for Life after the article appeared in the Vatican newspaper.
In this weeks interview, Fisichella says the three great elements of Pope Francis pontificate are the encounter with the person of Jesus, the constant proclamation the Church must announce, and that pastors are called to go out to meet everyone.
This is the idea of the Church going forth and therefore also the ability as Evangelii Gaudium notes to accompany our contemporaries, to walk alongside them in order to understand them, to really understand their needs and at times even, perhaps, to take a step backwards. This dimension emerges together with the need for mercy. The Jubilee of Mercy was the concrete sign of how Pope Francis has identified and guided his Pontificate, he explained.
Archbishop Fisichella said that Veritatis Splendor (promulgated by Pope John Paul II on August 6, 1993) was released in a cultural context marked by secularism and, consequently, by a strong philosophical relativism. Within this context, he said, the encyclical, presents the fundamental points which remain as references for Christian doctrine.
When we speak of truth, he said, we have to always keep in mind a dynamic concept. Truth is not a fixist dimension, he added, applying a biological evolutionary model to theological truth.
Fixism is the non-scientific theory that the species alive today are identical to those of the past and that evolution does not happen.
For Christians, truth is first and foremost that living World that the Lord has left us. Let us not forget that Jesus said: I am the way, the truth, and the life. Therefore, the dimension of truth opens to personal encounter: it is the truth of the Gospel, the truth represented by the person of Jesus Christ, he said.
The truth, he explained, is the entire content that Jesus wanted to transmit to his disciples and that comes to us through the Apostles. It is a truth that opens more and more to a discovery of the mystery that has been revealed. There are some fundamental points that remain as in the dogmatic and moral teaching of the Church. These are elements that remain in their immutability, Fisichella said.
Obviously, all of this requires on the part of theologians as the encyclical Vertiatis Splendor maintains a great work of interpretation. The unchanging norm is based on the truth of the Gospel.
Fisichella also insisted that the Catholic Church cannot accept an idea of truth which is closed in on itself. The truth, by its very nature, refers to fidelity but also to freedom. The truth shall make you free.
A truth that opens up more and more is a truth that makes every believer, every man, discover a deeper freedom. This, however, also requires fidelity. The link between fidelity and truth is a typical link of the biblical conception of truth.
In comments to LifeSiteNews, Dr. Peter Kwasniewski a Thomist scholar who openly criticized Pope Francis change in the Catechisms treatment of capital punishment as contradicting both the natural law and the deposit of faith and who argued that the change is not a mere prudential judgment but a matter of principle offered this response to Archbishop Fisichellas remarks:
All of the proponents of the revolution in moral doctrine always invoke a specious and vague concept of development of doctrine. It has become a mantra by which any position can be defended, so long as it bears some element of remote resemblance, without the need for argumentation or the actual preservation of substance. Remember, the rule given for development is that any new insight must totally respect the truths already attained, in their very specificity. So there could be a new insight into Christology, but not such that Jesus Christ ceased to be confessed as true God and true man. Similarly, in the field of morals, there are many new insights into marriage, but none that would ever justify its dissolution, or the use of contraception, or communion for adulterers; and it is no less true with regard to the death penalty, which, however often or rarely it should be used, is contained within the very power of the state as Gods representative in the governance of human affairs.
Unpacking the August 6 Fisichella interview, point by point, Dr. Kwasniewski said:
Characteristically, Fisichella hides in vagueness: we must reiterate how much continuity there is in the development. Translated from Vaticanese, this means: we must keep repeating, till were blue in the face, that the rabbit we pulled out of the hat is the same as the frog we put in. Using code language, he speaks of putting proclamation" before the norm, which means, there are no absolute norms that govern proclamation and pastoral accompaniment.
Then, in a move familiar from Walter Kaspers theology of revelation, Truth is a dynamic concept, not a fixist dimension, a living word, i.e., not capable of being propositionally expressed once and for all (as in the Churchs de fide statements and judgments). In this way, rather than having a fixed point of reference for Christian life and thought, which in Fisichellas way of thinking would be closed in on itself, we have a truth that opens up more and more.
Whatever this means, it apparently means that we have to be prepared to take a step backwards, i.e., renounce the traditional moral teaching of the Church for the sake of accompany[ing] our contemporaries. This, again in code language, is what he means by a great work of interpretation, which here translates to a clever work of deconstruction, utilizing points in John Paul IIs encyclical as references, but not as indisputable givens.
Kwasniewski summed up Fisichellas comments, saying: The cumulative effect of Fisichellas Orwellian twists and turns is that we can chuck out whatever in Veritatis Splendor (or Humanae Vitae or Familiaris Consortio, etc.) no longer seems to fit with the needs of modern Western people as seen by Pope Francis.
Barf alert.
I agree. The mosaic reveals he's a heretic. Thanks for proving our point.
The better question for this Archbishop to ask himself why do many, many heretofore loyal Catholics simply do not trust Pope Francis.
One more apostate in little mister bergoglio’s inner circle.
Does he mean that no one can compare what Frankie says to what the Magisterium says, the 2,000 + year instrument, in order to check and see if Frankie is full of baloney?
Have you ever seen that cartoon of a dog getting a lecture from his owner? The owner is choosing words carefully, but all the dog hears is, “Blah, blah, blah, Fido, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah!”
That’s about how the Vatican is starting to sound!
Lavender Mafia protecting the Lavender Mafia.
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!"
The “previous magisterium” as in JPII’s??? LOL
translation: We’re going to cram this down your pieholes whether you like it or not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.