To: pcottraux
Not banned.
Simply found lacking.
8 posted on
04/09/2018 3:05:36 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: humblegunner
We need a your opinion on this.
9 posted on
04/09/2018 3:08:09 PM PDT by
BipolarBob
(Build the Wall, with flamethrowers and machine gun nests.)
To: BenLurkin
Well contrary to popular belief, there was no official "council" that decided what should or shouldn't be in the New Testament. But the 27 books were written before 70 AD, while the so-called "banned" books (actually gnostic texts) were produced no earlier than 150 AD and contain bizarre, heretical doctrine.
But I see your point.
10 posted on
04/09/2018 3:16:19 PM PDT by
pcottraux
( depthsofpentecost.com)
To: BenLurkin
I watched it or something very similar a year or two ago.
The title was misleading. They simply studied the documents and chose the ones they thought were genuine. That means the others were not so much banned as just not included.
12 posted on
04/09/2018 3:55:50 PM PDT by
yarddog
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson