Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic Appointed as US Ambassador for Religious Freedom
Church Militant ^ | 1/25/18 | Rodney Pelletier

Posted on 01/27/2018 6:38:32 PM PST by marshmallow

Sam Brownback is the first Catholic to head up Office of International Religious Freedom

WASHINGTON (ChurchMilitant.com) - Senate confirms Trump appointee and Catholic Kansas governor, Sam Brownback, as the ambassador for international religious freedom.

On Wednesday, Vice-President Mike Pence broke a 49–49 vote tie in the Senate, making Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback — a pro-life Catholic convert — the fifth U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom. It's Pence's seventh tie-breaker since taking office just over a year ago.

Brownback will head up the Office of International Religious Freedom, a branch of the U.S. State Department, which helps the administration to form policies by monitoring religious persecution and discrimination around the world.

The office's job is to:

* Promote freedom of religion and conscience throughout the world as a fundamental human right and as a source of stability for all countries

* Assist emerging democracies in implementing freedom of religion and conscience

* Assist religious and human rights non-government organizations in promoting religious freedom

* Identify and denounce regimes that are severe persecutors on the basis of religious belief

Brownback is the first Catholic to hold the position. Previous ambassadors, Robert Seiple, John Hanford and Suzan Johnson Cook, are Protestant, while David Saperstein, the most recent ambassador, is Jewish.

(Excerpt) Read more at churchmilitant.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: malefeminist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 01/27/2018 6:38:32 PM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Why would Pence have to break a tie in a supposedly conservative Senate?

Never mind. I know the answer already.

Damned rinos.


2 posted on 01/27/2018 7:00:08 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
There's a big difference between "religious freedom" and "religious tolerance".

Religious Toleration

Toleration in general signifies patient forbearance in the presence of an evil which one is unable or unwilling to prevent. By religious toleration is understood the magnanimous indulgence which one shows towards a religion other than his own, accompanied by the moral determination to leave it and its adherents unmolested in private and public, although internally one views it with complete disapproval as a "false faith". Catholic Encyclopedia

3 posted on 01/27/2018 7:03:18 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

What is this supposedly conservative Senate of which you speak? The division is 51-49. The question is why the Democrats opposed the nomination.


4 posted on 01/27/2018 7:04:28 PM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Brownback is a convert to Catholicism. Good man.


5 posted on 01/27/2018 7:15:09 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

51-49


6 posted on 01/27/2018 7:15:27 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

The upside is that when Trump has to drop a MOAB on Congress in full session, this vote will be not forgotten.


7 posted on 01/27/2018 7:18:48 PM PST by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Brownback will do a superb job!


8 posted on 01/27/2018 7:40:00 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Great decision! Winning...more please!

JoMa


9 posted on 01/27/2018 7:47:36 PM PST by joma89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

“The question is why the Democrats opposed the nomination.”

Because he is the governor of Kansas and he has an “R” near his name. It shouldn’t make any difference rationally what a person who is supposed to assist in religious growth for new countries is listed as. The job description has nothing to do with politics. But the small, and sometimes, irrational thinking of liberals is they don’t care what he can do religiously, he just has an “R.”

I’m willing to bet if the senate had voted on an atheist, and he had a “D” in front of his name, you’d have seen a straight party vote for them. Let’s don’t put someone in that might be qualified. We have to vote for a dem only. It’s the way we work. Stupidly, maybe. But it’s tradition.

rwood


10 posted on 01/27/2018 7:59:19 PM PST by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

International Office of Religious Freedom? Need heard of such an office.

That being said - a “Catholic” to head up an office or commission on religious freedom is a bit ironic, considering centuries of Church history where the RC Church expended considerable resources (and lives) extinguishing religious freedom...


11 posted on 01/27/2018 8:22:13 PM PST by TheBattman (Voting for lesser evils still gets you evil...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

** RC Church expended considerable resources (and lives) extinguishing religious freedom...**

Source of this statement?

Or is it just your opinion?


12 posted on 01/27/2018 8:30:56 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Yeah.

And considering all the death threats Catholics faced form the KKK, and the discrimination faced by (legal) Catholic immigrants. And all the pearl-clutching about JFK as president.


13 posted on 01/27/2018 8:45:41 PM PST by castlebrew (Gun Control means hitting where you're aiming!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Prepare to be roasted.


14 posted on 01/27/2018 10:07:23 PM PST by WilliamCooper1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I really don’t think you want to go there. 1,000 years of European history is not on your side.


15 posted on 01/27/2018 10:08:43 PM PST by WilliamCooper1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WilliamCooper1; TheBattman
"Prepare to be roasted."

LOL! From the looks of their arguments, there are some who'd like to resume that ancient pastime.


16 posted on 01/27/2018 10:50:45 PM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman; Salvation

That’s because the Church teaching after Vatican II contradicts the Church teaching before Vatican II. It’s just that Catholics today have no idea that “religious liberty” was once condemned by the Catholic Church.

http://sspx.org/en/religious-liberty-contradicts-tradition


17 posted on 01/28/2018 5:02:37 AM PST by piusv (Pray for a return to the pre-Vatican II (Catholic) Faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

To Catholicism or the Vatican II faith?


18 posted on 01/28/2018 5:43:17 AM PST by piusv (Pray for a return to the pre-Vatican II (Catholic) Faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Foxe’s Book of Martyrs - the classic historical work is a great starting place:

http://www.ccel.org/f/foxe/martyrs/home.html


19 posted on 01/28/2018 11:16:55 AM PST by TheBattman (Voting for lesser evils still gets you evil...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sphinx; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; PhilCollins
>> The division is 51-49. The question is why the Democrats opposed the nomination. <<

No, the question is what RINO(s) voted against Brownback. Had the Senate voted entirely along party lines, Pence would not have been needed to cast a tie-breaking vote.

For the record, I'm NO FAN of Brownback overall (and I found it bizarre how FReepers heaped praise on squishy Brownback while demanding the MORE CONSERVATIVE Pat Roberts be purged from the Senate).

That being said, a vote to appoint Brownback to a position promoting religious freedom should be an EASY "yes" vote. I don't know any Republican who questions his commitment on that issue.

20 posted on 01/28/2018 1:47:38 PM PST by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson