Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Growing Share of Americans Say It’s Not Necessary to Believe in God to be Moral
Pew Research ^ | 10/16/17 | Gregory A. Smith

Posted on 11/06/2017 6:42:17 PM PST by marshmallow

Most U.S. adults now say it is not necessary to believe in God to be moral and have good values (56%), up from about half (49%) who expressed this view in 2011. This increase reflects the continued growth in the share of the population that has no religious affiliation, but it also is the result of changing attitudes among those who do identify with a religion, including white evangelical Protestants.

Surveys have long shown that religious “nones” – those who describe themselves religiously as atheist, agnostic or “nothing in particular” – are more likely than those who identify with a religion to say that belief in God is not a prerequisite for good values and morality. So the public’s increased rejection of the idea that belief in God is necessary for morality is due, in large part, to the spike in the share of Americans who are religious “nones.”

Indeed, the growth in the share of Americans who say belief in God is unnecessary for morality tracks closely with the growth in the share of the population that is religiously unaffiliated. In the 2011 Pew Research Center survey that included the question about God and morality, religious “nones” constituted 18% of the sample. By 2017, the share of “nones” stood at 25%.

But the continued growth of the “nones” is only part of the story. Attitudes about the necessity of belief in God for morality have also changed among those who do identify with a religion. Among all religiously affiliated adults, the share who say belief in God is unnecessary for morality ticked up modestly, from 42% in 2011 to 45% in 2017.

(Excerpt) Read more at pewresearch.org ...


TOPICS: Current Events; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: fakenews; fakeorganization; fakepoll; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: marshmallow
Hey Reza - what scalar value do folks who are "Easy to Use and Operate" render on yer cult-O-meter?

C.A.I.R. - Anaheim, 31 Mar 2007

"This is what people like Aslan and Greenwald, both of whom are allied with Islamic supremacists and jihadists in so many ways (see here and here for some details), and their friends and allies in groups like the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) do to anyone and everyone who speaks the truth about jihad terror. "

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/10/sam-harris-shocked-to-find-reza-aslan-and-green-greenwald-lying-about-him

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/11/reza-aslan-board-member-of-islamic-republic-lobbying-group-niac-cheers-iran-nuke-capitulation

 


 

61 posted on 11/07/2017 11:33:00 AM PST by HLPhat ("TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS" -- Government with any other purpose is not American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

If there wasn’t a God, where does the desire to be moral come from?


62 posted on 11/07/2017 12:08:49 PM PST by nobamanomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Considering today’s “morality,” of course not.


63 posted on 11/07/2017 12:41:34 PM PST by fwdude (Why is it that the only positive things to come out of LGBT organizations are their AIDS tests?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishBrigade

>>> ‘Morality must be re-defined in order to consider a Godless man “moral”.’

}}} please indicate what ‘re-definitions’ are necessary...please be specific...

Most of your definitions out there are inherently linked to law. Most of mankind’s basic “laws” are derived from religious sources... i.e. GOD’s Commands.

Therefore you would have to re-write the definition of morality so that it avoids references to both law and religion.

you would only be left with vague synonyms such as “good” and “righteous”, or “upstanding”... which of course are words which are completely relative and NOT definitive because there would be no common frame of reference or authoritative source.

Feel free to give me an example of a moral code (in use within a respectable society) which is not related or derived from a belief in God.


64 posted on 11/07/2017 5:20:36 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Otoh, society’s standards keep sinking, so you have to live higher and higher above those standards, to be decent.


65 posted on 11/10/2017 9:13:54 AM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson