Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Cath Cauc] Pope to Jesuits: Help Critics of Amoris Laetitia to See Its Morality Is Thomist
National Catholic Register ^ | September 28, 2017 | Edward Penting

Posted on 09/28/2017 4:08:03 PM PDT by ebb tide

He (Pope Francis) also insisted the morality of the document is “Thomist, the morality of the great Thomas,” and again directed questions in this regard to Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, the Dominican Archbishop of Vienna.

For a critique of the assertion that Amoris Laetitia is Thomistic, see Dominican Father Basil Cole’s commentary here, and his more recent critique of the exhortation here.

The Pope said those who criticize the document have a “purely casuistic” approach to morality, and urged his brother Jesuits to help them “understand that the great Thomas possesses the greatest richness, which is still able to inspire us today.

(Excerpt) Read more at ncregister.com ...


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Moral Issues; Theology
KEYWORDS: francischurch; heresy; jeuits; thomist

1 posted on 09/28/2017 4:08:03 PM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

HA HA HA....yeah like the modern Jesuits know Aquinas well enough for that.

AH HA HA HA!!!!!!

What a card.


2 posted on 09/28/2017 4:18:12 PM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Is ‘Amoris Laetitia’ Really Thomistic?
3 posted on 09/28/2017 4:19:01 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

St. Thomas Aquinas was the last person in the world to promulgate heresy.


4 posted on 09/28/2017 4:22:55 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
St. Thomas Aquinas was the last person in the world to promulgate heresy.

But Jorge Bergoglio appears to be a pope who is doing so.

5 posted on 09/28/2017 4:36:40 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

He thinks we’re stupid.


6 posted on 09/28/2017 4:37:41 PM PDT by pax_et_bonum (Never Forget the SEALs of Extortion 17 - and God Bless The United States of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Actually, the morality of AL is pure situation ethics, promoted by the Jesuits but condemned by the Pope Pius XII in the 1950s.


7 posted on 09/28/2017 5:26:16 PM PDT by Antoninus ("In Washington, swamp drain you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
Someone should submit a dubia asking if their allegedly "Thomistic" document supports what St. Thomas actually said:

Question 154. The parts of Lust

Article 2. Whether simple fornication is a mortal sin?

It is written (Tobit 4:13): "Take heed to keep thyself . . . from all fornication, and beside thy wife never endure to know a crime." Now crime denotes a mortal sin. Therefore fornication and all intercourse with other than one's wife is a mortal sin.

Further, nothing but mortal sin debars a man from God's kingdom. But fornication debars him, as shown by the words of the Apostle (Galatians 5:21), who after mentioning fornication and certain other vices, adds: "They who do such things shall not obtain the kingdom of God." Therefore simple fornication is a mortal sin.

Further, it is written in the Decretals (XXII, qu. i, can. Praedicandum): "They should know that the same penance is to be enjoined for perjury as for adultery, fornication, and wilful murder and other criminal offenses." Therefore simple fornication is a criminal or mortal sin.

Article 8. Whether adultery is determinate species of lust, distinct from the other species?

I answer that, Adultery, as its name implies, "is access to another's marriage-bed [ad alienum torum]" [Cf. Append. Gratian, ad can. Ille autem. xxxii, qu. 1. By so doing a man is guilty of a twofold offense against chastity and the good of human procreation. First, by accession to a woman who is not joined to him in marriage, which is contrary to the good of the upbringing of his own children. Secondly, by accession to a woman who is united to another in marriage, and thus he hinders the good of another's children. The same applies to the married woman who is corrupted by adultery. Wherefore it is written (Sirach 23:32-33): "Every woman . . . that leaveth her husband . . . shall be guilty of sin. For first she hath been unfaithful to the law of the Most High" (since there it is commanded: "Thou shalt not commit adultery"); "and secondly, she hath offended against her husband," by making it uncertain that the children are his: "thirdly, she hath fornicated in adultery, and hath gotten children of another man," which is contrary to the good of her offspring. The first of these, however, is common to all mortal sins, while the two others belong especially to the deformity of adultery. Hence it is manifest that adultery is a determinate species of lust, through having a special deformity in venereal acts. . .

Article 12. Whether the unnatural vice is the greatest sin among the species of lust?

I answer that, In every genus, worst of all is the corruption of the principle on which the rest depend. Now the principles of reason are those things that are according to nature, because reason presupposes things as determined by nature, before disposing of other things according as it is fitting. This may be observed both in speculative and in practical matters. Wherefore just as in speculative matters the most grievous and shameful error is that which is about things the knowledge of which is naturally bestowed on man, so in matters of action it is most grave and shameful to act against things as determined by nature. Therefore, since by the unnatural vices man transgresses that which has been determined by nature with regard to the use of venereal actions, it follows that in this matter this sin is gravest of all. . .

8 posted on 09/28/2017 6:13:34 PM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson