To: marshmallow
Since they’re not a public accommodation, it’s very difficult to see how a court could come to any other conclusion — religious affiliation or not.
2 posted on
08/04/2017 7:00:07 PM PDT by
FredZarguna
(And what Rough Beast, its hour come 'round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
To: marshmallow
I hope this helps the appeal of Baronelle Stuzman.
3 posted on
08/04/2017 7:05:49 PM PDT by
thecodont
To: marshmallow
It means that government officials must allow creative professionals without storefronts anywhere in the city and state the freedom to make their own decisions about which ideas they will use their artistic expression to promote. The court found—and the city and state have now agreed—that such professionals cannot be punished under public accommodation laws for exercising their artistic freedom because those laws simply don’t apply to them. Does this mean that having a storefront isn't similarly protected?
4 posted on
08/04/2017 7:46:06 PM PDT by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: marshmallow
Our WI supreme court has been 4-3 conservative for a good while now. No signs of going back, and if anything, hopefully will be 5-2 in the near future.
6 posted on
08/04/2017 8:48:25 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: marshmallow
I can just imagine what the pictures would have looked like. “Oh my, I didn’t realize the camera was pointed down. So sorry I did not get your head in the picture.”
To: marshmallow
9 posted on
08/04/2017 9:19:24 PM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: marshmallow
Let's take a moment to celebrate a religious liberty victory. It doesn't happen often so let's cherish it.That's a little narrow minded isn't it. It is a more far reaching victory against human bondage. Along the lines of any free individual forced by government to work for others against his own will.
10 posted on
08/04/2017 9:49:49 PM PDT by
higgmeister
( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
To: marshmallow
If they want to buy cupcakes,light bulbs,flowers you are a business and can’t discriminate...Buuuuut,you are asking people to be slaves and forced to give their talents,artistry etc to something they don’t agree with..Forcing people to use their talent for what you like...Isn’t that what Nazis did to their film industry? Are liberals going to follow the Nazi agenda to its final solution????
To: marshmallow
No one should be threatened with punishment for having views that the government doesn’t favor. ABSOLUTELY!!!!!
17 posted on
08/05/2017 12:05:52 PM PDT by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
To: marshmallow
No one should be threatened with punishment for having views that the government doesn’t favor. ABSOLUTELY!!!!!
18 posted on
08/05/2017 12:05:53 PM PDT by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson