Posted on 05/10/2017 9:03:36 AM PDT by Salvation
Arthur, you're not seeing that He could have said to Satan, "I AM The Son of God. Shut up and leave." And that would have happened. But He took the opportunity to show that the authority of the Holy Writings which He had caused to be set down by Moses still overpowered in source, authority, reasoning, the faulty logic of the god of this world (2 Cor. 4:4). And one of the uses was to employ figurative-literal language and Koine grammar to illustrate a spiritual truth and its permanence.
But likewise, without tiring you with detail, in two more instances Jesus reprimands the Devil by elevating the Word that stands forever (perfect tense in the Koine) above His Own very present personal authority (Ps. 138:2), refuses to obey the Devil's wishes (as Satan's other unsaved children must), but commands him to leave the Lord's presence.
Jesus does this without reference to any of the religious entities then existent, that we might see by reading that it is the Holy Scriptures alone by which other religious (or falsely religious) endeavors must be judged.
Too bad it has to be explained to you. Your religion is not the Voice of Christ on Earth that it pretends to be, overriding even the God-inspired progressively revealed and comprehensive Completed Word that we have, which has been translated into many languages.
The method of transmission of paradoses preached in the churches have been without error only when they were written down by inspiration of the Holy Spirit at the time. They have not been effcyively and erroneously transmitted by oral tradition even in the time when the apostles were yet alive; most certainly not to our age through pious but uninspired fallible men.
TYhat is why Scripture Alone is reliable; traditional practices are not.
And we have records of written Scripture stretching far back and it has remained the same throughout history.
Whereas traditions are continually changing.
The way I explain it is partially the saying, “Tradition is the living faith of the dead. Traditionalism is the dead faith of the living.”
Though in some cases I also encourage traditions as long as it’s properly understood that the traditions we carry out (such as, for example, Advent wreaths) serve the proclamation of the Word. And when they’re no longer in service to the Word or no longer useful, they should end.
Please cite the version you are quoting from.
Salvation is apart from works. Justification is apart from works. Primary sanctification is apart from works. Baptism in and indwelling of the Holy Spirit is apart from works.
These are all contingent upon one's commitment of total, unreserved, never-ceasing eternal trust in the Lord Jesus Christ, His faithfulness, His Blood, and His works that totally placate and satisfy The Mighty God's righteous well-deserved fiery wrath against the person's Sin and sinfulness; such that God The Father may extend the hand of fellowship, and impute the Righteousness of His Son to the account of the otherwise lost human at the moment that the person repents and accepts the transaction offered: My Son's Righteousness in exchange for the totality of your sins and guilt.
Going forward from that point, works acceptable to God are the evidence of Spirit-empowered and Spirit-led progressive sanctification of the new regenerated believer-disciple-priest and Friend of Christ, to and through the physical death of this human that God has graciously and freely saved on the basis of one's trust in The Christ His Son.
Such a person in this life is to expect persecution not only from Satan, his demons, and the existing world system, but also from unregenerated "believers" who think that a part of earning their way to Heaven is attempting to destroy the doctrine of salvation by faith alone in Christ alone, which plan would destroy the entire basis of their false religion and false christs, as well as the reliance of The Holy Writings as the supreme authority upon which the true believer's faith rests.
"But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain" (Titus 3:9 AV).
We may not find it just to escape such contentions, for we are asked to contend for The Faith once delivered to the Saints when a false Christ's flag is flown; but we can try to avoid name-calling and mud-slinging, eh? Let the Holy Spirit do the convicting.
Preach it, brother!!!
Yeah. Paedobaptism might have made one a "Catholic," but water baptism in any form or at any time doesn't make one a Christian.
The "unfinished business" is that for one who has knowingly repented from a life of sin, who has fallen in trust on Jesus for salvation, and thereby received remission of sins and a new spiritual life, ought to then present him/herself to the elders of a local assembly for the rite of water-baptism for induction into the body of Christ as a willing member and as a disciple-in-training for life.
The old infant baptism of an unresistant uncomplying ignorant infantile subject means exactly nothing in the life or doctrine of a servant of Christ.
Selah
Yeah. Paedobaptism might have made one a "Catholic," but water baptism in any form or at any time doesn't make one a Christian.
The "unfinished business" is that for one who has knowingly repented from a life of sin, who has fallen in trust on Jesus for salvation, and thereby received remission of sins and a new spiritual life, ought to then present him/herself to the elders of a local assembly for the rite of water-baptism for induction into the body of Christ as a willing member and as a disciple-in-training for life.
The old infant baptism of an unresistant uncomplying ignorant infantile subject means exactly nothing in the life or doctrine of a servant of Christ.
Such persons are not "wandering Catholics"--they are misled humans who have come under saving faith through preaching of the genuine Gospel, and have found the Way to God through true unreserved personal commitment to His Son.
Their well-founded disgust with the failings of catholicity are not to be taken as "profane" without checking their provenance and the intent.
I actually missed that myself the first few times I read it.
I refer you to the freely downloadable, thorough discussion of "The Seven Baptisms of the New Testament" (click here) by Fred Wittman, offered by Happy Heralds, Inc.
But thank you for giving me the opportunity to present this treatise.
But this is why so many persons denominating themsewlves as Catholics are in fact unregenerated "believers" who will have no excuse for being left behind when the Lord comes in the clouds to harvest His servants from the wrath to come.
16. God the Father gave his only Son to the world only through Mary. Whatever desires the patriarchs may have cherished, whatever entreaties the prophets and saints of the Old Law may have had for 4,000 years to obtain that treasure, it was Mary alone who merited it and found grace before God by the power of her prayers and the perfection of her virtues. "The world being unworthy," said Saint Augustine, "to receive the Son of God directly from the hands of the Father, he gave his Son to Mary for the world to receive him from her."
The Son of God became man for our salvation but only in Mary and through Mary.
God the Holy Spirit formed Jesus Christ in Mary but only after having asked her consent through one of the chief ministers of his court.
Again, you are shooting yourself in the foot. There are several words in the Koine for little children, and "paidion" is only one of them. In the case where I used it, it refers to those I specifically identified, and you are trying to move the goalposts.
Please don't think you are impressing me with this analysis. It's rather puerile (look that one up, eh?). Jesus never baptised, nor did any of His disciples ever baptize children not of an age to be instructed in the gospel and accountable as an adult to God of their actions. It is one thing to be childlike in demeanor, but another thing to be childish in responsive abilitities:
"Brethren, be not children in understanding: howbeit in malice be ye children, but in understanding be men" (1 Cor. 14:20 AV).
Your verses do not touch the water baptism of saved adults who are able to commit themselves to Christ with the mind of Christ (Php. 2:5,8). Are the of a capacity to count the cost of commitment, of enduring persecution, of undertaking the responsibilities of becoming dead to Satan, to Sin as a master, to self, and tothe world system, and to come alive in Christ? Well, I thought not. Baptism of an unaccountable infant is incorrigibly criminal when he/she is later told that they were saved by that infant baptism, when it is not possible that they were.
No more discussion on this distraction. Your intent is to rob the Gospel of its true impact on those who have no control over their propensity to sin, and that is just what you are committing in this diatribe.
I seriously wonder what Catholic seminaries teach their students.
What did she NOT do to merit it?
Or what did she DO to merit it?
Can't say, but many FR Catholics have accused others of their brotherhood of being poorly catechized.
(I don't know what that means; either.)
There is merit it no human other than this - Christ died for us. Apart from that no one is righteous or has any standing in the eyes of God.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.