“Which is? Let me guess . . . physically, in a piece of embossed flour?”
And you think the Eucharist isn’t spiritual? Again, your logic is not logical at all.
“You don’t need to answer that. Your mind/spirit doesn’t seem to be responding right now, anyway, since you haven’t taken what I said seriously and for your benefit, with much care and concern.”
First of all, you can’t even make a logically coherent argument. Taking you seriously is naturally undercut by that fact.
“It’s on you, chum. You’ve been warned. By the Holy Ghost speaking to you through the Holy Scripture.”
I listened to the Holy Ghost a long time ago: That’s why I’m not a Protestant.
And transubstantiation is logical? It is certainly not Scriptural. The challenge to you from Paul was both logical and Spiritual. Not mine. Paul's. The Apostle. Apparently your integrator is not working properly.
And "Protestant"? I am not one of them. I am a New-Testament-configured-regenerated-believer-disciple-priest, and friend of the Savior and Lord Jesus Crist, the kind demanded and exemplified long before the novelty of Catholicism was invented by humans circumventing God's plan of salvation.
Don't lecture me on logic or spirituality, when all you have is reasonings, like the people God once drowned (Gen. 6:5, Mk. 2:6, 2 Cor. 10:5).
And Mormons say:
"I listened to the Holy Ghost a long time ago: That’s why I’m not a Protestant OR a Catholic!!