Skip to comments.
Jesuit Leader: No One Recorded Jesus' Words on Marriage, It's 'Nuanced,' Never 'Black and White'
CNS News ^
| April 3,2017
| Michael W. Chapman
Posted on 04/04/2017 12:07:48 AM PDT by Robwin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
This piece states the Jesuits have become more liberal, modernist in the last 60 years. I should say so. What Catholic leader since the founding of the Church would question the sanctity and nature of Holy Matrimony?
1
posted on
04/04/2017 12:07:48 AM PDT
by
Robwin
To: Robwin
I take it the Ten Commandments, like the Constitution, are a “living” document.
2
posted on
04/04/2017 12:12:23 AM PDT
by
AZLiberty
(A is now A once again.)
To: AZLiberty
If the Church promulgates Heresy, is it heresy?
3
posted on
04/04/2017 12:19:19 AM PDT
by
arthurus
To: AZLiberty
Due to a sneaky translation from the Hebrew Moses's Ten Suggestions were redesignated Commandments. The prologue at the beginning actually was: It Would Be Nice If-
The Jesuits are merely correcting the record.
4
posted on
04/04/2017 12:23:20 AM PDT
by
arthurus
To: Robwin
Srsly?
I’m not Catholic, but just from what I read, seems pretty clear what Jesus says. The only possible argument I see is whether adultery is an acceptable reason for remarriage of the wronged partner.
5
posted on
04/04/2017 12:25:30 AM PDT
by
Luircin
(Dancing in the streets! Time to DRAIN THE SWAMP!)
To: Robwin
“Did God really say?” — Serpent in the Garden
To: spirited irish
To: Robwin
“despite Jesus Christ’s words about marriage”, Jesus didn’t talk about marriage. What a contradiction.
To: Robwin
Only under certain distinct circumstances do miracles occur. The wine.
9
posted on
04/04/2017 1:26:56 AM PDT
by
Scram1
To: Robwin
They’ve given themselves over to the worship of mammon.
10
posted on
04/04/2017 1:34:33 AM PDT
by
Grimmy
(equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
To: Robwin
"the religious order has grown very liberal, modernist over the last 60 years"
In other words, worldly and anti-Christian. They've embraced the serpent in the garden and serve the Dark One.
To: Robwin
12
posted on
04/04/2017 1:56:29 AM PDT
by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
To: Robwin
The Jesuits have
always been the "intelligentsia" of the Catholic Church.
Their purpose has not necessarily been doctrinal purity so much as maintenance of ecclesiastical power.
13
posted on
04/04/2017 2:08:54 AM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true)
To: Robwin
Matthew 19:4 He said to them, Have you not read that He Who made them in the first place made them man and woman? 5 It says, For this reason a man will leave his father and his mother and will live with his wife. The two will become one. 6 So they are no longer two but one. Let no man divide what God has put together.
Seems pretty clear to me.
He really didn’t talk about bestiality, so does that mean it is okay?
To: Robwin
The Jesuits are an evil order serving a heretic pope..
15
posted on
04/04/2017 2:27:12 AM PDT
by
ZULU
(DUMP THAT POS PAUL RYAN!! HE KILLED OBAMACARE REPEAL AND WILL KILL TAX REFORM!!)
To: Robwin
“What is truth?”
— Pilate
(although he was not on tape)
To: castlegreyskull
Depends on what kind of animal :)
17
posted on
04/04/2017 2:30:19 AM PDT
by
dp0622
(The only thing an upper crust cIonservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
To: castlegreyskull
The Pharisees also came to Him, testing Him, and saying to Him, Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for just any reason? And He answered and said to them, Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning made them male and female,
and said, For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh?
So then, they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate.
They said to Him, Why then did Moses command to give a certificate of divorce, and to put her away?
He said to them, Moses, because of the hardness of your hearts, permitted you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so.
And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced commits adultery.
____________________________________________________________
I'm with you. I don't see the nuance.
18
posted on
04/04/2017 2:43:19 AM PDT
by
Pollster1
("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
To: Luircin
The only possible argument I see is whether adultery is an acceptable reason for remarriage of the wronged partner. True. Is it "adultery" after the vows or "sexual immorality" before the vows?
19
posted on
04/04/2017 2:47:13 AM PDT
by
markomalley
(Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
To: Robwin
What the hell does that mean ? Dam Jesuits always equivocating to current moral concepts.
20
posted on
04/04/2017 2:56:32 AM PDT
by
mosesdapoet
(My best insights get lost in FR's because of meaningless venting no one reads.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson