Skip to comments.
Can the Church change its doctrines?
Catholic Answers ^
| n/a
| CA staff
Posted on 05/20/2016 5:01:10 PM PDT by Salvation
Can the Church change its doctrines?
Full Question
I was amazed to read recently where a Catholic priest theologian said that the Church is not infallible and that it has changed its doctrines. Apparently he felt Jesus' words in Matthew 18:18-19 ("Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. Again, I say to you, if two of you agree on earth about anything for which they are to pray, it shall be granted them by my heavenly Father") mean that the Church can change its doctrines as times change.
Answer
No, the Church cannot change its doctrines no matter how badly some theologians may want it to or how loudly they claim it can. The doctrines of the Catholic Church are the deposit of faith revealed by Jesus Christ, taught by the apostles, and handed down in their entirety by the apostles to their successors. Since revealed truth cannot change, and since the deposit of faith is comprised of revealed truth, expressed in Scripture and Sacred Tradition, the deposit of faith cannot change.
While it's certainly true that our Lord's words to the apostles in Matthew 18:18-19 grant authority to the apostles to "bind" the members of the Church to believe the doctrines of the Church ("He who listens to you listens to me. He who rejects you rejects me and the one who sent me" [Luke 10:16]), the "loosing" spoken of in Mathew. 18:18 does not mean the apostles can modify doctrine.
The Church does not have the power to do the impossible, to change or delete divinely revealed truth which forms the deposit of faith. Rather, the concept of loosing, as it pertains to the apostles and their successors, has more to do the Church's ability to dispense individuals or the whole Church from observing certain ecclesiastical disciplines. There are many examples of this authority to bind and loose in the arena of Church discipline. Here are a few:
- In the early Church married men were permitted to be ordained as priests in the West. This custom was changed in the tenth century and since then, in the Latin Rite, candidates for the priesthood must be celibate.
- Until recent years it was forbidden under pain of mortal sin to eat meat on Fridays. The Church has "loosed" this discipline and now allows the faithful to eat meat on Fridays provided some other act of mortification is performed.
- Prior to Vatican II, the pre-Communion fast extended from midnight until the time one received Communion; no food or water were to be consumed. This discipline was relaxed first to a three-hour fast and then to the one-hour fast the Church now observes.
- Matthew 18 also refers to the Church's authority to bind and loose with regard to sin. Every priest has the authority of Christ to "loose" (absolve) penitents from their sins through the sacrament of confession (Jn 20:21-22, 2 Cor 5:18-20). The priest also has the obligation, in rare cases when he sees no evidence of contrition or an unwillingness on the part of the penitent to stop committing sin, to "bind" someone in their sins by refusing to grant him absolution until he evinces genuine contrition.
- The faithful may gain indulgences through corporal and spiritual acts of charity, certain prayers, and pilgrimages, and are thus, by the authority of the Church's power to bind and loose, able to receive partial or complete remission of all temporal punishment due to sin. Through indulgences the Church may loose Christians from the duty of penance which would otherwise need to be performed.
- Certain forms of excommunication may be "loosed" only by a bishop or, in graver circumstances, only by the Holy See.
- Priests and religious who request it can be "loosed" (dispensed) from their vows of celibacy (and, in the case of religious, the vows of poverty and obedience).
None of these issues deals with doctrine as such (since doctrine is unchangeable) but with Church discipline, government, and penance.
TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; doctrine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Many people will be relieved to find out that Catholic Doctrine cannot change.
1
posted on
05/20/2016 5:01:10 PM PDT
by
Salvation
To: nickcarraway; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; ArrogantBustard; Catholicguy; RobbyS; marshmallow; ...
2
posted on
05/20/2016 5:02:07 PM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Salvation
Absolutely. Grace and truth never changes but church doctrines tend to change quite a bit.
3
posted on
05/20/2016 5:03:24 PM PDT
by
Jim W N
To: Jim 0216
Did you read the article?
You might want to focus on the last line.
**None of these issues deals with doctrine as such (since doctrine is unchangeable) but with Church discipline, government, and penance.**
Catholic Doctrine does NOT change.
4
posted on
05/20/2016 5:10:39 PM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Salvation
Is the Assumption of Mary doctrine?
5
posted on
05/20/2016 5:10:41 PM PDT
by
sparklite2
( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
To: All
Well, they no longer sell indulgences (I think) and quit burning heretics alive (thank goodness) so those are positive changes. Churches change but it is God that does not change.
6
posted on
05/20/2016 5:10:55 PM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(I'm so open minded that you should only think like me.)
To: Salvation
7
posted on
05/20/2016 5:11:06 PM PDT
by
soycd
To: sparklite2
8
posted on
05/20/2016 5:11:11 PM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: BipolarBob
Do they still burn witches?
Never mind, that was English Protestants...
9
posted on
05/20/2016 5:29:50 PM PDT
by
kearnyirish2
(Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
To: BipolarBob
Ahem. Selling of indulgences -— or of any other spiritual good -— is neither a doctrine nor a dogma. It is a sin. It was a sin in the First Century when Simon Magus tried to buy spiritual powers from St. Peter (and Simon Magus’ name was adopted to name the sin, “simony”); it was a sin in the 16th century when popes and their agents were doing it; and it would be a sin today.
Popes sin. (News flash!). And the sins of highly placed churchmen are still that -— sins — not doctrines.
Same for burning heretics. There is no doctrine of the Church that says people must or may be executed for theological error.
Oh yes, the leading men of the Catholic Church have been sinners from the beginning. On Good Friday, one Apostle sold Jesus out for thirty pieces of silver, one denied Him three times, and the rest (except John) scattered and hid like the cowards they were. Behold, our first hierarchy!
But repentance and grace prevail, through the gracious saving power of Christ, Who did not and does not abandon us to our human errors.
Christ rescues His Church -— every time.
Praise Him!
10
posted on
05/20/2016 5:41:09 PM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Still Catholic after all these years.)
To: soycd
Read what you wrote again... very carefully...
11
posted on
05/20/2016 5:41:54 PM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
12
posted on
05/20/2016 5:46:43 PM PDT
by
tiki
To: pgyanke
“One can only share a belief, not teach it.”
Exactly what I meant. Believing is an individual trait. Like Gravity, it exists, yet can not be quantified. Quanta is an individual element that belief has yet to identify.
13
posted on
05/20/2016 5:49:41 PM PDT
by
soycd
To: Salvation
I am deeply offended by “the Church”. I am a protestant . Stop that.
14
posted on
05/20/2016 6:04:33 PM PDT
by
WENDLE
(NEWT is the one!!)
To: WENDLE
15
posted on
05/20/2016 6:07:55 PM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Jim 0216
Some people would be better off to not open their mouth.
16
posted on
05/20/2016 6:10:13 PM PDT
by
PraiseTheLord
(have you seen the fema camps, shackle box cars, thousands of guillotines, stacks of coffins ~)
To: Mrs. Don-o
Selling of indulgences - or of any other spiritual good - is neither a doctrine nor a dogma. It was a practice carried out by a large powerful church.
And the sins of highly placed churchmen are still that - sins not doctrines.
More wordplay. It became an established practice. Same difference as doctrine . . at least to the ones being burned.
Who did not and does not abandon us to our human errors.
And how do we know that for sure? Don't tell me. You think you are the One True Church that Jesus made a promise to. How about if you're not? And the One True Church is really an invisible collection of souls that God keeps under His watch that he keeps track of instead of a man made denomination. Matt. 7:22, 23
17
posted on
05/20/2016 6:14:39 PM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(I'm so open minded that you should only think like me.)
To: Salvation; WENDLE
No!! Not the “How old is your Church” question. Would it not be more grammatically correct to ask “How long has your denomination been in existence”? But even that seems inconsequential in the long haul. Adam worshiped God in the Garden of Eden. Abraham worshiped Him long ago. Moses led the Hebrews out of Egypt and the worshiped Him. The Apostles and Jesus were all Jews, so they got some time in before Catholicism as well. God didn’t leave us a denomination, He left us His Word and His Promise. Let’s read, meditate and practice that.
18
posted on
05/20/2016 6:23:45 PM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(I'm so open minded that you should only think like me.)
To: BipolarBob
Wordplay? Do you say there is no difference between divine Truth and sinful practice?
To return again to a very early example: do you think betraying and abandoning Jesus was a doctrine of the NT Church?
19
posted on
05/20/2016 6:31:58 PM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Still Catholic after all these years.)
To: Mrs. Don-o
do you think betraying and abandoning Jesus was a doctrine of the NT Church? No, but it made them better disciples and strengthened them for later trials (except for Judas). They repented and regretted their actions. There is a difference between a moment of weakness (with possible danger to themselves) and persistent actions over many many years of an institution which inflicted cruel tortures and death to who knows how many souls that believed different from them. Maybe you don't see the difference but I am sure God does.
20
posted on
05/20/2016 6:41:09 PM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(I'm so open minded that you should only think like me.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson