Posted on 04/11/2016 6:15:24 PM PDT by markomalley
I’ve often found myself wondering about the bias I see at the Catholic News Service(CNS), which seems to gloss over many of the serious problems in the Church.
Today, my friend Michael Hichborn at the Lepanto Institute has a story on CNS Director and Editor in Chief Tony Spence that may help shed some light on the bias of the USCCB’s official news and information service:
Tony Spence has been the head of the Catholic News Service since 2004. Over the last few weeks, Spence has been publishing statements on his own twitter feed, identifying him as the head of CNS, speaking out against legislative efforts protect the religious freedoms of individuals, businesses and churches.
Hichborn offers copious evidence, including eight separate screenshots of Spence’s Twitter account, in which he is promoting various LGBT issues. Hichborn goes on:
In 2010, Spence was presented with the Catholic Press Association’s St. Francis de Sales Award, which is the “highest award the CPA presents to an individual for “outstanding contributions to Catholic journalism.” In light of what Spence has been writing in direct attacks against Catholic moral and social teaching, one has to wonder if CPA will demand its award back.
In a major twist of irony, and now apparent hypocrisy, it was Spence who, in 2013, ended Catholic News Services’ relationship with Adam Shaw, an editor for the FOX News website. Shaw had been working with Catholic News Service as a film and video game reviewer. On 4 December of 2013, Shaw published an opinion piece on FOX News’ website criticizing Pope Francis by comparing him to US President Barack Obama. Two days later, Shaw was no longer welcome at CNS. What is so ironic is that the statement issued by Tony Spence regarding his reasons for severing ties with Shaw absolutely applies for him regarding these statements on twitter now. Spence said:
“(W)hen he penned the recent piece on Pope Francis, comparing him to President Obama, and presenting it as an op/ed, he seriously compromised his credibility as an objective Catholic journalist for CNS. Had Adam merely reported on the pope’s apostolic exhortation, even citing unflattering sources, there would have been no problem. However, Adam’s caustic condemnation of the exhortation and of Francis himself, one of the key figures we cover daily with objectivity, fairness and certainly charity, left me little choice but to end his service with us.”
What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. If a low-level reporter at the Catholic News Service is released for issuing his own public opinions regarding the pope, then surely the head of the same agency should likewise be released for issuing public opinions that are in direct conflict with Catholic moral and social teaching.
It’s getting pretty old to see these stories again and again. Does the US Conference of Catholic Bishops care at all about having a CNS Director who is faithful to the Church’s teaching? It’s safe to assume, considering the brazen and public nature of Spence’s conduct, that the answer is no.
Over a year ago, I reported to you that Ralph McCloud, the director of the USCCB’s Catholic Campaign for Human Development,
had, during his first year working for the US bishops, simultaneously served as Treasurer for the campaign of Wendy Davis – then in the process of unseating a pro-life incumbent in the Texas state senate. (Two years later, she would become best known for her 11-hour filibuster in the Texas state legislature to block a bill seeking to enact more restrictive abortion regulations. Davis was also endorsed by Planned Parenthood.)
Despite this, McCloud is still the head of the CCHD. And since 2011, not a few stories have come out about the organization’s consistent failure to identify appropriate recipients of its funding. Just this month alone, three additional press releases have crossed my desk from the Lepanto Institute alone:
January 5th – CCHD linked by funding to Planned Parenthood-affiliated Merced Organizing Project.
January 13th – CCHD linked by funding to an organization performing same-sex “marriage.”
January 20th – CCHD linked by funding to an organization tasked with helping to establish marijuana farms.
15 months later, McCloud is still listed as the head of the CCHD. The US Bishops Conference has ZERO accountability on these issues, and they continue to leave them in place with impunity.
I wish I had the power to defund the USCCB. I can tell you that they will not get a red cent from me until things start changing. In fact, considering the millions they take from dioceses around the country each year, my inclination is not to fund them either.
I’m sick and tired of seeing Catholic organizations act as though they’re anything but.
Ping.
"Paid for by our tax dollars, that is, to Catholic and Lutheran Charities, who make a ton of profit off the import of these primitives."
"Congressman Barton speaks following Lakeview tour"
esp watch last 10 min: interview with 'church' organizer Matt Authier (who's on the take)
(notice how Authier is continuously and nervously bobbing his head up and down
-hoping to speed up each question and get the interview over with)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59J0i3LNoY8
*****
As an aside, I saw my very first muslim terrorist yesterday in Target.
He was wiping his snot from his runny nose on the produce and then putting the produce back. I circled them a few times to confirm. He had an imam with him, as well as a Mexican handler, who looked embarrassed.
The imam was yakking loudly on the phone to announce their presence. You know, as a form of territory marking like ghetto people do with their stereos - “I’m here; respect me”.
The Mexican was obviously a paid assistant - Paid for by our tax dollars, that is, to Catholic Charities, who make a ton of profit off the import of these primitives.
6 posted on April 8, 2016 at 3:09:55 PM CDT by T-Bone Texan
*****
The way it was explaind to me is this:
The church group (not just Catholic Charities, there are others profiting from this treason, like Lutheran and Baptist groups) gets a contract from the FedGov. They then provide “services” to the terrorist.
One of these services is integrating the terrorist into our society, and they will take the terrorist on field trips wherein they learn how to game the system, exploit our kindness, and in my case wipe their snot on veggies/produce that other people will buy in an attempt to make them sick.
But make no mistake, Catholic Charites and many other religious groups have recently signed very lucrative contracts with the FedGov, and thus when they announce that helping terrorists is moral and godly, I ask “Who profits from this action? - Cui bono?”
These groups are very happy to take the govt’s money, and the collateral damage that is the utter destruction of our culture
They should be your enemy too.
PS: The handler was Mexican. He was a product of Mexican culture and he was otherwise unrelated to the terrorist and the imam culturally. He even looked embarrassed, which is a “tell” vs muslims, who never seem to have a sense of shame, only arrogance and entitlement.
7 posted on April 8, 2016 at 3:11:29 PM CDT by T-Bone Texan
This is great!
Thank you. Maybe plenty of lurkers will see this. Maybe it’ll do some good.
Can’t the actual Catholic religion sue people who use the word “Catholic” to promote agendas that are 100% against Catholic teachings?
That I do not know but I’d guess not.
Thanks markomalley.
Thanks for the ping. Good to know.
actually, Tony, stupid is spelling ‘contagious’ incorrectly...
Just typical Catholic hostility to the American Bible Belt. No surprise at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.