Posted on 09/09/2015 9:28:44 AM PDT by BlatherNaut
Jeb is meeting with the Pope on Sept. 23. Weird.
Also you would think the Pope would be very concerned about Planned Parenthood genocide, selling of dead baby parts.
Vatican crickets. Very strange.
Who does he think he is.....Obama???
Has this man ever read a Bible?
If you think this doctrinal change is bad... just wait until the gospel itself is re-defined.
They are called "executive orders". Haha.
Oh, stop it now, that's craaaaaaaaaazzzzzzzzyyyyy!
Just like our Constitution.
NWO and transnationalism. An elitist tail is wagging the world dog like never before. Apply Psalm 2 for relief.
Psalm 2 indeed! (You know Psalm 2 is linked to Revelation 2:27 I believe?)
I believe these Elites “game the Bible” on these issues, without believing exactly in the Bible. Sorta like Mormons.
You heard what French President Jacques Chirac said George W Bush said about his motivations for going to Iraq?
“Gog and Magog at work..”
Chirac had to hire a Biblical expert to decipher what Bush meant:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/andrewbrown/2009/aug/10/religion-george-bush
Church doctrine is, by definition, whatever the people running the church say it is.
Comes from the Latin “doctrina” or “teaching.”
It is not easier to get an annulment, the Pope put into place rules which will speed up the process. For example, the 3-person tribunal used to reauire that 2 of them be priests; now the requirement is for only one priest. If a bishop has two more qualified laypeople, he can double the capacity.
People may believe that annulments are now given out like candy, but since one of the invalidating points is that one or both of the partners planned to use artificial birth control, and this was a notion which was erroneously taught or not explained to many people in the US, it is not surprising that many invalid marriages were performed.
The main problem, as it so often is, is that the media does not understand Church teaching and also puts on its own destructive spin when reporting.
What EXACTLY is the doctrinal “change” supposed to be? A change in canon law procedure does not necessarily encroach on anything “doctrinal”.
notice my tagger
One of my major problems with this denomination is how much power they give to one individual. If that person is steadfast in their doctrine and conduct, that’s great.
If they aren’t, then what?
“If you think this doctrinal change is bad... just wait until the gospel itself is re-defined.”
Long, long, long ago.
Francis can only affect Roman Catholics.
I think the first Third World Pope has been watching and learning from America's first Third World President. He sure is beginning to act like Obama. What will they come up with when they get together during the Pope's visit to the US?
“Apply Psalm 2 for relief.”
GREAT advice! I do it often.
“Long, long, long ago.”
If you read the NT, right out of the starting gate! False teachers being addressed right and left. From those apostolic writings (indeed the whole of Scripture) we can tell who is antichrist and who is not. They set the standard by which all after them are judged true/false concerning the Gospel.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.