Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

POPE FRANCIS FOR YEAR OF MERCY GRANTS THAT SSPX PRIESTS CAN VALIDLY ABSOLVE!
WDTPRS ^ | September 1, 2015 | Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

Posted on 09/01/2015 3:53:50 AM PDT by NYer

Huge news. This was under embargo till noon, Rome time, which must be honored. [UPDATE: The Bollettino is now available HERE]

The Year of Mercy begins 8 December 2015 until 20 November 2016.

It is about to be announced that the Holy Father has sent a letter to Archbishop Rino Fisichella, President of the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of the New Evangelization about the upcoming Extraordinary Year of Mercy.

In this letter the Pope says that he is granting to all priests the faculty to absolve from the sin of abortion.  He writes: “I have decided, notwithstanding anything to the contrary, to concede to all priests for the Jubilee Year the discretion to absolve of the sin of abortion those who have procured it and who, with contrite heart, seek forgiveness for it.”  Interesting way to word it.

He also says that the faithful may go to … well… read it yourself.  Here is a screenshot from the doc:

15_09_01_Francis_SSPX

This is HUGE news.

Let’s examine this.

First, note the language.  This letter says that he hopes that the SSPX will be reconciled.  He says that he hears good things about the priests of the SSPX.  But he says that the faithful may approach the priests of the SSPX for the Sacrament of Reconciliation (Penance) and that they shall validly and licitly receive absolution.  He doesn’t say that he is granting the priests the faculty to receive sacramental confessions.  He places the emphasis on the faithful.  In effect, the priests are being given the faculty to hear confessions, but there is a different emphasis.  I have the sense that it is the need of the faithful who otherwise might not go to a non-SSPX priest that the Holy Father is stressing.  Think about the case of a person who is dying and there is, say, an ex-priest -a guy who was “laicized” because he committed certain crimes, present, the Church’s laws says that in the circumstances of the person’s danger of death any validly ordained priest automatically has the faculty validly to absolve.  The need of the dying person is of such overwhelming importance that the law itself grants the ex-priest (or suspended priest, etc.) the faculty.  The stress is on the need of the dying person, not on the priest.  I think this is an analogous situation.

Along with this, the fact of Pope Francis’ move, together with the wording, confirms what I have been saying all along about the priests of the SSPX: they do not and have not had the faculty validly to absolve sins!  The fact that this is being granted for the Year of Mercy bears out what I have been saying.

That said, if the Holy Father is willing to go this far with the priests of the SSPX, is it hard to imagine that this merciful concession might not be extended beyond the Year of Mercy?  I would like to think so!

Next, this concession also underscores a point I have been making all along.  If only Nixon could go to China, perhaps Pope Francis is the Pope who will reconcile the SSPX!

Additionally, this could irritate some bishops in, say, France… Germany….  And even though this may not be well received in certain circles, the Pope is doing it anyway.

Moreover, earlier in his pontificate, this Pope was pretty hard on priests.  He seemed to be bashing them on a daily basis.   This move to grant all priests in the world the faculty to lift the censure which results from procuring an abortion is a sign of his confidence in priests… for a change.

I take heart from this bold move – which makes so much sense (to me at least) – in favor of the access the faithful will have to sacrament of penance.  I hope that it will also spark a wider discussion on the positive things that will come from the reconciliation of the SSPX.  I hope that discussion takes place even among the SSPXers themselves.

May all the followers of the SSPX , please God, look at this move with joy and with gratitude for the concern the Pope is showing to them.

And… to everyone… GO TO CONFESSION!

But… remember, the Year of Mercy hasn’t started yet and the SSPX does not yet have their faculty.  GO TO CONFESSION with priest with faculties!

UPDATE 1020 UTC:

The Fishwrap has posted on this now. They get it wrong, of course. They openly call the SSPXers “schismatic”.


TOPICS: Catholic; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: catholic; francis; pope; popefrancis; sspx; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-429 last
To: piusv
Unless they're speaking of those terrible Trads who actually defend the Catholic Faith as it was always taught!

HMMMmmm...

421 posted on 09/09/2015 4:16:45 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

“Only in his mind.”

No, I’m absolutely right: It’s just a fact that I never once claimed that Pope Leo XIII didn’t believe they were heretics.


422 posted on 09/09/2015 4:18:03 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

“Yet some on this forum, claim today’s Anglicans are not the heretics that former popes declared them to be.”

Who EXACTLY has said that ebb tide? You repeatedly make things up. Do you not know that bearing false witness against someone is a sin?


423 posted on 09/09/2015 4:21:05 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: piusv

“It conflicts with the new Vatican II ecclesiology!”

So Pope Leo XIII was pope at Vatican II? That’s even more bizarre than believing Pope Leo X lived when there were Anglicans.


424 posted on 09/09/2015 4:24:36 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: piusv

You’re so right. He’s so confused, it’s pitiful.


425 posted on 09/09/2015 4:27:19 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

LOL. I know. Where he got that I said that Pope Leo XIII was at Vatican II I’ll never know.


426 posted on 09/09/2015 4:51:28 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: piusv
See his Post 238. He appears to have severe memory defenciencies:

Their ancestors were schismatics and heretics. Present day Anglicans are not called such.

Compare to his Post 423

[ebb tide]“Yet some on this forum, claim today’s Anglicans are not the heretics that former popes declared them to be.”

Who EXACTLY has said that ebb tide? You repeatedly make things up. Do you not know that bearing false witness against someone is a sin?

427 posted on 09/09/2015 7:16:58 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
Do you not know that bearing false witness against someone is a sin?

Indeed.

428 posted on 09/10/2015 6:19:10 AM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Interesting — had missed this until now (not that I sit on the edge of my chair waiting for the pope to say one thing or another about SSPX). God might view them as having had faculty all along. I’m skeptical the pope can turn things on and off like that.


429 posted on 01/19/2016 6:55:50 PM PST by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc OMorgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-429 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson