[Salvation]

I guess many people are still Catholic Bashing.

[WVKayaker]

Hmmmmmmm!!!

[ealgeone]

See post 77

[Secret Agent Man]

Yeah, anyone who disagrees must be catholic bashing.

[avenir]

“I guess many people are still Catholic Bashing.”

Salvation, I don’t see any point in posting this thread outside of a Caucus. Do you? Really? How else was this thread going to turn out?

The article itself—very poorly written IMO—bashes Protestants. I could care less about that if a fierce defense was accepted but here you are talking about Catholics being bashed. What exactly DO you expect from non-Catholics on open threads such as this?

[kinsman redeemer]

Listen, when someone posts something about a Catholic belief and it is obviously controversial, then it should be posted in the protective space of the “Catholic Caucus.”

Otherwise a controversy will follow.

It is not Catholics who are being bashed - it is what Catholicism teaches.

You know how to mark a new post as a caucus, you do it all the time. Nobody (usually) bothers you. Hardly anyone pays attention, in fact. Maybe you could help the situation by teaching other Catholics to follow your lead.

I wonder if you could ask the Mod to reclassify a post as soon as you see that its content is likely to draw criticism of the “Holy Roman Catholic Church.”

Saying things like “Mary was without sin” or she is the “mother of God” (with all it implies) along with a whole host of other controversial declarations are sparks that will bring firestorms of criticism from Christians who believe otherwise.

Whining about the criticism is an immature response. So, use the caucus feature to protect your sensitivities.

Thanks.

[ealgeone]

I wonder sometimes why you and nkp_vet post these in the open forum if you anticipate there will be contrasting comments.

It makes you look like you're attempting to bait people.

Are you looking for a reason to run to the RM again as you like to do??

[daniel1212]

I guess many people are still Catholic Bashing.

Not again! Where do you see Catholic Bashing in response to the first post? You mean the objections cited in the article were "Bashing?" Why is not the article "bashing" Prots by attacking their objections?

Please provide a reasonable definition of "bashing" that applies to both sides so that all may avoid the censure of wannebe RMs who careless use it for the opposition.