That is a false statement by you and mind reading or false attribution of words that I did not write.
When you take facts and string them together in a way that subverts their truthfulness, you have made a beautiful falsehood.
Yet I have told the truth here. Are you accusing personally me of subverting truthfulness and telling falsehoods?
On that we agree.
Again, you have falsely attributed agreement by mind reading or false attribution. I indicated no such agreement with you. I had thought the standards and demeanor had improved recently on the RF.
Some people think their truth is more important than THE Truth!
"I'm gonna tell mommy!"
Oh good grief. To the RM.....again....really? Some catholics are thin skinned to be sure.
If you don’t agree, just say you don’t.
“Yet I have told the truth here. Are you accusing personally me of subverting truthfulness and telling falsehoods?”
I do not believe “you told the truth here.” That may be your intent. I cannot read your mind.
I am not “accusing” you or anyone. I am saying that when you string facts together in a way that distorts the meaning, you are creating a beautiful falsehood.
Do you have to make it personal. Can we discuss this objectively, without it being about you?