Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: af_vet_1981

If you don’t agree, just say you don’t.

“Yet I have told the truth here. Are you accusing personally me of subverting truthfulness and telling falsehoods?”

I do not believe “you told the truth here.” That may be your intent. I cannot read your mind.

I am not “accusing” you or anyone. I am saying that when you string facts together in a way that distorts the meaning, you are creating a beautiful falsehood.

Do you have to make it personal. Can we discuss this objectively, without it being about you?


445 posted on 08/19/2015 7:49:23 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( "Forward lies the crown, and onward is the goal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies ]


To: aMorePerfectUnion
I do not believe “you told the truth here.” That may be your intent. I cannot read your mind.
    The scriptural facts I presented are unrefuted:
  1. Isaiah prophesied the virgin of Israel would bear a son called "God with us"
  2. Matthew testified that Mary is that virgin and that her son's name fulfilled that prophecy specifically calling it "God with us."
  3. Mary is the mother of "God with us."

472 posted on 08/20/2015 6:47:42 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson