“we have preached to you”
Right. Not sola scriptura.
“”Do not go beyond what is written.””
Which appears to be about Paul’s writings to Corinth he just made about man’s role in God’s work.
“Simply show that that apostles taught the assumption of Mary and that it was written.”
Ah, just predicted now the claim is about sola scriptura when that was not what was demanded earlier. Since sola scriptura is no where taught in scripture it is self-refuting. Since you asked for the teaching - and were given it in a previous post (a direct link that is) - your question was answered. Changing your question now to be about sola scriptura won’t help you.
“I will therefore consider the teaching of the Catholic Church to be accursed just as the Holy Spirit through Paul told us to do.”
A typical anti-Catholic probably would consider “the teaching of the Catholic Church to be accursed” in any case. Bigotry closes the mind after all. Anti-Catholicism: lead paint chips for the mind.
No, it's not about sola scriptura. You can use whatever source you want to prove that the apostles taught the assumption of Mary. If Catholics can't do that then they should just man up and admit it's made up from assumptions and leave it at that. That is after all what the site you sent to me says.
Since sola scriptura is no where taught in scripture it is self-refuting.
Really?
This from a person who accepts that since Elijah was taken up in a whirlwind; then Mary could have bveen; too?
Catholicism has NO problem with taking something written in the Bible and trying to APPLY it elsewhere.