Posted on 06/12/2015 3:29:33 PM PDT by NYer
Legitimate succession was always a matter of concern in biblical religion. The book of Genesis is careful to give the lineage of the patriarchs, from the first man, Adam, to Noah (Gen. 5). The book of Exodus takes similar care as it sets down the priestly generations (Exod. 6). The Chronicles make clear that the monarchy was legitimately passed from father to son (1 Chron. 3). Indeed, the Old Testament histories assure us that “all Israel was enrolled by genealogies” (1 Chron. 9:1).
This article is from the Catholic Viewer’s Guide to AD: The Bible Continues (airs Sundays at 9/8c). Read more of this fascinating history in Ministers and Martyrs.
And the concern for lineage did not pass away in the New Testament. To establish Jesus’ credentials as Messiah, the Gospels detailed His lineage through generations, going back to Abraham (Mt. 1) and even through Adam to God (Luke 3).
In the Old Testament, succession took place in the natural order, through genetic transmission. In the apostolic age, we see a new principle at work. St. Paul was a man who made a firm commitment to live a celibate life (see 1 Cor. 7:1, 7-8), yet he could pass along the grace he had received — by means of the same act by which he himself received the grace: the laying on of hands (Acts 13:2-3).
St. Paul discussed the act in his later letters to Timothy, whom he had ordained (1 Tim. 4:14; 5:22; 2 Tim. 1:6). From Paul we learn that ordination is a “gift of God,” although it is conferred by one man upon another. We know that it is a supernatural event consummated by the prayers of those who are authorized to give such “prophetic utterance.” We know that the gift is given through “elders” in the Faith to those of a new generation in ministry — who will in turn give it to another generation. As the Father sent the Son, so the Son sent the Apostles — and so the Apostles sent their disciples to serve as bishops.
As time passed and the Faith spread to new lands, the Church valued apostolic succession all the more. It was a safeguard against heresy. The Church could point to a succession that was public and sacramental, whose authenticity could be easily verified. One of Paul’s Roman disciples, a man named Clement, spoke of the matter:
The Apostles received the Gospel for us from the Lord Jesus Christ; Jesus Christ was sent forth from God. So Christ is from God, and the Apostles are from Christ. Both therefore came of the will of God in the appointed order. Having received their orders . . . they went forth with the good news that the kingdom of God was to come. So preaching everywhere, in country and town, they appointed their first-fruits, when they had proved them by the Spirit, to be bishops and deacons to those who should believe. . . .
Our Apostles knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that there would be contention over the office of bishop. That is why, having received complete foreknowledge, they appointed the aforesaid persons, and afterward they gave the offices a permanent character, that if these should fall asleep, other approved men should succeed to their ministry (Saint Clement of Rome, To the Corinthians 42:1-4; 44:1-2).
And so they still succeed today, to the offices established by the Apostles.
In revelation 1,2 & 3, there are 7 churches, catholic, we've been told, teaching with the AUTHORITY of an Apostle behind it; ERROR. All gone now.
Clearly?
Guessing is GREAT fun; ain't it!
Well I can't find it!
Aside from the massive amounts of circular logic shown in the text; this leaped out at me:
6. Thus, when it was solemnly proclaimed that Mary, the Virgin Mother of God, was from the very beginning free from the taint of original sin, the minds of the faithful were filled with a stronger hope that the day might soon come when the dogma of the Virgin Mary's bodily Assumption into heaven would also be defined by the Church's supreme teaching authority.Stronger HOPE?
Most readers would understand that "the teaching" was referring to what the apostles taught.
“Houston; we have a problem.”
It’s the same one you’ve always had.
“Really?”
And?
“This from a person who accepts that since Elijah was taken up in a whirlwind; then Mary could have bveen; too?”
And?
“Catholicism has NO problem with taking something written in the Bible and trying to APPLY it elsewhere.”
Protestantism has NO problem inventing self-refuting doctrines like sola scriptura.
“Clearly?”
Yes, clearly. https://www.biblegateway.com/quicksearch/?quicksearch=bishop&qs_version=KJV
“Well I can’t find it!”
The blindness of bigotry has no internet cure.
“Stronger HOPE?”
Yes.
“Really?”
Yes. Are you saying you’ve never read of this before? It amazes me how ignorant of the Catholic faith and its history anti-Catholics routinely are.
“Most readers would understand that “the teaching” was referring to what the apostles taught.”
Most anti-Catholics use whatever excuse they can when they lose an argument.
“LOOK! Over there!”
More apparent desperation from Elsie? It always comes in caps, cartoons and pics. When Elsie can’t make an argument everything else gets posted.
Mocking is all I have left!
“What have you posted that needs refuting?”
Nothing since I didn’t post anything wrong or heretical. That’s your job.
Yes, what I posted was correct. Between us only you posted anything Protestant or otherwise heretical.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.