How about weddings of gay immigrants, Marco?
By attending a sodomite “wedding”, one gives tacit approval to same.
If he’s this mealy-mouthed as a candidate, imagine what a pushover he would be as president.
Yo, Marco, what do you do when the officiater (is that a word?) gets to the part where he or she akses, “Is there anybody here who knows of a reason why these (insert number here) should not get married, let him speak now or forever hold his peace.”?
“Attending is giving your tacit approval of the abomination.”
That is so true. That is the attitude of the usual gutless, fence-straddling politician who poses as the rare one who can look down deep and see and understand all positions.
I feel for those Tea Party saps who forked over their hard earned dough for this puke.
Oh, good. A moral relativist in The White House. We've never had one of those before. I wonder how that will work out.
Another Rubio fail.
*sigh*
It’s really too bad, he had such promise. But he obviously is not up to the job.
Rubio, you just feel off my “will even consider” list.
In the receiving line, do you kiss the groom and the groom or what?? or the she and the she?? To congratulate them is an abomination.
Why do these people answer these hypothetical gotcha questions?
Rubio’s blatant duplicity on amnesty was bad enough to leave me extremely distrustful of him, but otherwise I still thought he was at least generally conservative on this kind of issue. Apparently not. America’s moral rot obviously doesn’t bother him, or he’s yet another cowardly GOP-er who’s ready to cowtow to the homo-fascists.
This is the final nail for me, in regards to Rubio. He will never get my vote under any circumstances, either top or bottom of the ticket.
I’m going to take heat for this, but I agree with Rubio here. While I disagree, with some decisions, family trumps all.
Tell me how that works out for you, Marco.
It’s “forbidden” for a Catholic to attend a Protestant service? Thats just not true.
“....furthermore,” Rubio continued, “why do we permit Americans to own guns? Guns are awful. I also object to anyone who dislikes Common Core. Furthermore, the concept of Private Property is a dead letter in America. We need central, communist planning.”
Pretty sure Marco isn’t a Catholic for sometime now. He is a protestant now. I suppose it is not the point anyhow as to which.
I would never attend a homosexual wedding. Even if my best friend ever were to have one.
The left has, once again, subtly changed the discussion in order to trap republicans. The issue isn’t whether Rubio (or Cruz or Walker or even Jeb Freaking Bush) would attend a gay wedding. The issue is whether a florist or a baker or a pizza pie maker should be forced to go against his religious beliefs and supply goods for a gay wedding.
Since none of the putative republican candidates is in the business of providing goods or services to weddings, the entire discussion is moot. It’s a clever liberal device that, based on what I’ve seen on this thread, is working as planned. If Rubio says he would boycott a gay wedding, he is branded as a right-wing zealot and a homophobe. If he says he would go to such a wedding, he alienates Catholics and others of strong religious beliefs. The correct answer would be: “It’s my personal decision whether or not to attend, and, since it has no bearing on the way I would govern, I’m not going to answer it. Now, I will answer questions about whether or not religious beliefs, as promised in the First Amendment can be used as a reason for a business owner to not provide his services.”
Darn that Rubio, He is acting just like Dick Cheney again