To: Elsie
No facts? Do you dispute what I wrote? I welcome your rebuttal to them.
What is the point of dissecting the article further when its opening statements are shown to be so very wrong?
To: hockeyCEO
No facts? Do you dispute what I wrote?Do YOU document what you claim?
This article continues on with more heresy.
97 posted on
02/14/2015 9:56:06 AM PST by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: hockeyCEO; DuncanWaring
Happy Valentine's Day you guys!!
98 posted on
02/14/2015 9:57:49 AM PST by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: hockeyCEO
.....”What is the point of dissecting the article further when its opening statements are shown to be so very wrong?”.....
Defending ones beliefs we are called to do....if an article’s statements are wrong to an individual then it’s good present what one believes is accurate....let the debate begin....which IS “the point of dissecting the article”.
108 posted on
02/14/2015 1:03:25 PM PST by
caww
To: hockeyCEO; RnMomof7
What is the point of dissecting the article further when its opening statements are shown to be so very wrong? Shown to be wrong how? All I saw was personal attack against RnMom.
RC's post hit pieces on Protestantism all the time.
If y'all can dish it out, you ought to be able to take it.
And besides, this is really a close examination of what Rome claims. If it's wrong. Prove it.
111 posted on
02/14/2015 1:09:23 PM PST by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson