[metmom]

What is the point of dissecting the article further when its opening statements are shown to be so very wrong?

Shown to be wrong how? All I saw was personal attack against RnMom.

RC's post hit pieces on Protestantism all the time.

If y'all can dish it out, you ought to be able to take it.

And besides, this is really a close examination of what Rome claims. If it's wrong. Prove it.

[hockeyCEO]

Personal attack? Every statement I've made has been strictly about the article. I don't even know what RnMom has said about the article, so how can I attack her? The article is fair game. Now, however, I do find it personally offensive for you to suggest that my posts are uncivil. Luckily we have a record of the transcript.

I have proven it. It is up to you to show any errors of my rebuttal.