Posted on 02/13/2015 5:56:00 PM PST by RnMomof7
Looks like more than a nerve was touched....
Interesting that once again the ‘victim’ card is played.....remarkable that that in itself is “taught” to catholics. ..rather than be “defenders of the faith” they profess.
I’ve read posts to no 33 and it’s ALL playing victim or lashing out and not surprisingly attempting to change the topic to something else...not one post defending their position. Perhaps I will meet that along the way.
....”Someone has posted on the RF recently, the Roman “house” is built upon a pebble (Peter), the true universal/catholic house is built upon bedrock - Jesus Christ and the word of God (Sola Scriptura).......It’s high time somebody start a series on the false foundation of Romanism. I can think of no subject needed more”.....
Amen!
Looks and sounds more like Denominations....calling them “Rites” rather then ‘Sects’ or Denominations doesn’t change the obvious.
For more interesting is the graph doen’s depict Jesus Christ as head...It shows your Church as HEad....quite revealing in itself. Also looks like a “Split” between West and East marked the beginnings of all the various sects which came thereafter.
Interesting references....puts a lot to contradiction of what otherwise is so often spoken by catholics today. I tend to think they don’t really understand what they’re being taught...and the vast amounts of information from their past just floods them sufficient to loose the Gospel Message itself.
.....”What is the point of dissecting the article further when its opening statements are shown to be so very wrong?”.....
Defending ones beliefs we are called to do....if an article’s statements are wrong to an individual then it’s good present what one believes is accurate....let the debate begin....which IS “the point of dissecting the article”.
Perhaps that board needs to be brought out and played among catholics to determine which is accurate and which is not....why the division in the first place since Peter was supposedly the basic foundation of Roman catholicism why would any move away from that to another version?
I thought of Progressive/Liberalss who consitsentnly add or change their mind saying there thoughts and or ideas have... "evolved",.... rather than admit they were/are wrong in the first place.
Shown to be wrong how? All I saw was personal attack against RnMom.
RC's post hit pieces on Protestantism all the time.
If y'all can dish it out, you ought to be able to take it.
And besides, this is really a close examination of what Rome claims. If it's wrong. Prove it.
They think if they impugn the messenger the message goes away.
The Vatican II Mass devotes too much attention to the Celebrant and the other members of the congregation.
Who adds new souls to the church?
Both can’t be right. Which one is the true Catholic church? Vat2 or SSPX?
Protestant history starts with the reformation so you might need to dig a little deeper to learn about the Christian Church.
Noticed they gave him little feet.
Also the case holding his skull is quite prophetic of the TV age. Looks like a circa 1950s TV with rabbit ears.
We did.
It's found right here....
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts+1&version=ESV
and here....
http://legacy.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=ESV
Scroll down the the bottom and read the books from Romans through the first thee chapters of Revelation.
oh?
In whose humble opinion?
Why did the V2 guys spend SO much time on something the mere Hoi polloi in the pews can reject at will?
Isn't that kinda like being your own pope?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.