Is it true? (That the Pope ordered the document to be published as if the comments were never written.)
In that case, the article isn’t lying. We need to know if the article is truthful.
...On more substantive matters, other things have emerged as well. We still dont know exactly how the four radical paragraphs on homosexuals found their way into the original Relatio. I was not present when the Relatio was read out last Monday. (Id just arrived in Rome.) But someone who was told me something significant that must be kept in mind in coming months.
Archbishop Bruno Forte and Antonio Spadaro, S. J., editor-in-chief of La Civiltá Cattolica, the official/unofficial voice of the Vatican and the place where the Holy Father published the first of many controversial interviews, gave each other an open thumbs-up when the sections on gays were read out. This seems to suggest that not even they were certain (Forte wrote the section on gays) that those passages would survive into the interim document.
...Its not hard to see that whatever happens now document or no document, final vote or no vote outreach to gays and Communion for the divorced and remarried are now inserted into the discussion at the highest levels of the Church. And unless theres some strong action from Pope Francis, theyre going to stay there.
Theres been some shrewd manipulation of the parliamentary procedures all along to get us to this point. Even if there is a course correction in the coming months, the Church is now going to be dealing with these divisive confusions for the foreseeable future.