I know of no one who observes the New Moons, Sabbaths or feasts who are still offering the meat and drink offerings that are detailed in 2 0collossians and Ezekiel 45:17, as each of this had special ordinances attached to them..
I certainly believe scripture confirms that no more offerings are needed.. those were nailed to the cross..
There seems a word or two missing from your version that you may find in ezekiel .
And if one thinks New Moons and Sabbaths were nailed to the cross,
One has to ignore the Millennial Kingdom propechies of Ezekiel 46:1 and Isaiah 66 when both prophets are quoting our Sovereign specifically saying New Moons and Sabbaths will be around..
And no wonder, the Messiah’s major life events occured on New Moons, Sabbaths and Feasts.
Those were nailed to the cross, laid in the tomb,and they rose again...and without those old testament prophets you could hang your whole vain philosophy on one verse..
And if you understand those and His timekeeping, you will reject the traditions of men and world conformity you have allowed to lead your work and worship life.
His calendar is a far better calendar then your Pope’s calendar..
It points to the Son, not the sun..
So does those New Moons, Sabbaths and Feasts that Christendom has created their own substitutes for..
And there are scriptures that prove they are not going anywhere.. your Thor’s day and Friya day and Woden’s day and december 25 and easter will be going bye bye.
Those counterfeits will go where the master counterfeiter will go- the pit for those 1000 years.
Be careful what you cling to here..
Matthew 23:1-3,23
You are genuinely weird. You also contradict the Apostles. I’ll cling to the Word of God. If you choose to cling to something else, and be built on a foundation of Jewish feasts that pointed to Christ but that were not the reality...then it won’t be me who pays the price.
“11-14 We may go further. If it be possible to bring men to spiritual maturity through the Levitical priestly system (for that is the system under which the people were given the Law), why does the necessity arise for another priest to make his appearance after the order of Melchizedek, instead of following the normal priestly calling of Aaron? For if there is a transference of priestly powers, there will necessarily follow an alteration of the Law regarding priesthood. He who is described as our High Priest belongs to another tribe, no member of which had ever attended the altar! For it is a matter of history that our Lord was a descendant of Judah, and Moses made no mention of priesthood in connection with that tribe.
15-17 How fundamental is this change becomes all the more apparent when we see this other priest appearing according to the Melchizedek pattern, and deriving his priesthood not by virtue of a command imposed from outside, but from the power of indestructible life within. For the witness to him, as we have seen, is: ‘You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.’
18-19 Quite plainly, then, there is a definite cancellation of the previous commandment because of its ineffectiveness and uselessness—the Law was incapable of bringing anyone to real maturity—followed by the introduction of a better hope, through which we approach our God...
...26-27 Here is the High Priest we need. A man who is holy, faultless, unstained, beyond the very reach of sin and lifted to the very Heavens. There is no need for him, like the High Priest we know, to offer up sacrifice, first for our own sins and then for the people’s. He made one sacrifice, once for all, when he offered up himself.
28 The Law makes for its High Priests men of human weakness. But the word of the oath, which came after the Law, makes for High Priest the Son, who is perfect for ever!...
...8-12 Actually, however, God does show himself dissatisfied for he says to those under the first agreement: ‘Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah—not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they did not continue in my covenant, and I disregarded them, says the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel: After those days, says the Lord, I will put my laws in their mind and write them on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. None of them shall teach his neighbour, and none his brother, saying, Know the Lord, for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest of them. For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more’.
13 The mere fact that God speaks of a new covenant or agreement makes the old one out of date. And when a thing grows weak and out of date it is obviously soon going to be dispensed with altogether.”
“8-10 After saying, “Sacrifice and offering, burnt offerings, and offerings for sin you did not desire, nor had pleasure in them” (which are made according to the Law), Christ then says, “Behold, I have come to do your will, O God.” That means he is dispensing with the old order of sacrifices, and establishing a new order of obedience to the will of God, and in that will we have been made holy by the single unique offering of the body of Christ.
11-16 Every human priest stands day by day performing his religious duties and offering time after time the same sacrifices—which can never actually remove sins. But this man, after offering one sacrifice for sins for ever, took his seat at God’s right hand, from that time offering no more sacrifice, but waiting until “his enemies be made his footstool”. For by virtue of that one offering he has perfected for all time every one whom he makes holy. The Holy Spirit himself endorses this truth for us, when he says, first: ‘This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, says the Lord: I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds I will write them’.
17 And then, he adds, ‘Their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more’.
18 Where God grants remission of sin there can be no question of making further atonement.”
I apologize for the “weird” comment. It was uncalled for and unacceptable. Please forgive me. I sometimes type without thinking - a bad habit I need to work on. I’m sorry.