It sounds as though the baby killers are a little upset. LOL! They’ll get over it.
I walked downtown today. Women were just dropping like flies.
Such incredible stupidity and/or duplicity.
Wrong, Ms. Richards. You will not be denied birth control. The ruling only means that we don't have to pay for it.
Have you seen some of these “gals”? Most aren’t going to be in need of birth control of any type. They have a natural built in case.
They live by the slogan.
Plan B might work. Get the name of each guy you “hang out” with and charge them for your contraceptives.
Why is it that when rulings like this come down that essentially tell Women , NO you cannot force someone else to pay for your sex life, you can pay for it yourself, they lose their minds??
So many news stories have this story wrong. Hobby Lobby already provides some birth control for their employees.
What they were objecting to was the mandate that Obamacare issued that was against their family faith since they are a “closely held” family company.
This doesn’t apply to big corporations. I really think a Catholic source would get the story straight.
And the reason that justices got away with their decision is because parents are not making sure that their children are being taught the difference between legislative and judicial powers.
All this ruling does is stop companies from having to fund abortifacients. Hobby Lobby’s current insurance covers 16 types of birth control. They objected only to abortifacients.
Where is leadership when you need it/them? Is there anyone man or woman enough to tell Ilyse, "JUST SHUT UP!"? Since when does some radical, leftist group have the right to tell any employer it HAS to provide any service to its employees. Seems like Facism to me.
Case goes the liberal, evil way, lots of rejoicing from the left.
Case goes the conservative, righteous way, near-riots break out.
Here, I'll do it, "Ilyse, JUST SHUT UP!
Why would four lesbians (that includes Breyer) care about birth control?
The Left would have you believe that this opinion was all about contraception. But it wasn’t. It was about abortifacients masquerading as contraception, and whether or not government can force folks to pay for those they employ to destroy their posterity. Of course, what it, and all cases like it, should be about, actually, is the immorality, unconstitutionality, and illegality of the murder of ANY person via chemical or surgical means. While I’m glad that the owners of Hobby Lobby aren’t being forced to violate their own consciences, the question must be asked, where is the outrage against the even more egregious violation of the right to equal protection for the right to life for these millions of helpless little persons in the womb?
Ilyse Hogue, a social change practitioner, media consumer and analyst, and online engagement expert, is the president of NARAL Pro-Choice America. Previously, she served as Co-Director of Friends of Democracy, a 2012 initiative to build political power around the issue of money in politics and as Senior Adviser to Media Matters for America where she focused on advocacy programs to undercut the power of right-wing media. From 2006- 2011, Ilyse was Director of Political Advocacy and Communications for MoveOn.org.
ilyse hogue (@ilyseh) tweeted at 4:42pm - 30 Jun 14:
Love that @ConnieSchultz is on @edshow says that #HobbyLobby just means me need single payer. #SCOTUS #JointheDissent (https://twitter.com/ilyseh/status/483727369447157760)
ilyse hogue (@ilyseh) tweeted at 1:31pm - 30 Jun 14:
“Over 90% of Americas businesses r closely-held, including such large employers as Koch Industries & Bechtel.” @NancyPelosi #HobbyLobby (https://twitter.com/ilyseh/status/483679337095655424)
These people are truly ignorant!
*********
ilyse hogue (@ilyseh) tweeted at 12:22pm - 30 Jun 14:
Will female #HobbyLobby be offered a refund by their bosses since their healthcare doesn’t cover all it does for men? #SCOTUS (https://twitter.com/ilyseh/status/483661888195403776)
ilyse hogue (@ilyseh) tweeted at 9:04am - 30 Jun 14:
. @irin on @msnbc reminding people that #HobbyLobby could just pay fine & not offer insurance to employees. Not substantial burden. #SCOTUS (https://twitter.com/ilyseh/status/483611955551551488)
******
$450,000,000 is not substantial burden according to these fools...
How about male justices stand with little babies against murderous mothers?