Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anglicans Set to Remove Satan from Baptismal Rite
Crisis Magazine ^ | June 30, 2014 | ANNE HENDERSHOTT

Posted on 06/30/2014 9:01:20 AM PDT by NYer

Queen Elizabeth baptism

Declaring that the devil has departed from the Church of England’s baptism service, the Guardian reported on June 20 that “a simplified baptism which omits mention of the devil” is now favored by the clergy who have test-marketed it throughout the United Kingdom. Claiming that the traditional rejection of the devil and all rebellion against God “put off people who are offended to be addressed as sinners,” clergy claimed that they found it much easier to ask parents and godparents to make vows that do not mention Satan.

Responding to a population “which sees no pressing reason to spend Sunday mornings or any other time in Church,” the Guardian reports, the new and improved baptism service also deletes the instruction to the godparents that the child will keep God’s commandments, and learn what a Christian “ought to know and believe to his soul’s health”—promising only that the church “shall do all that we can to ensure that there is a welcoming place for you. We will play our part in helping you guide these children along the way of faith.”

The proposal to delete the devil from the ritual received initial approval by the House of Bishops and will be debated by the Anglican General Synod in York this July. If approved, these changes may reveal that the Church of England is losing its sense of sin—and its need for salvation. More than 60 years ago, T.S. Eliot wrote about the sense of alienation that occurred when social regulators—like the church—began to splinter and the controlling moral authority of a society is no longer effective. He suggested that a “sense of sin” was beginning to disappear. In his play “The Cocktail Party,” a troubled young woman confides in her psychiatrist that she feels “sinful” because of her relationship with a married man. She is distressed not so much by the illicit relationship, but rather, by the strange sense of sin. Eliot writes that “having a sense of sin seems abnormal, she believed that she had become ill.”

Writing in 1950, Eliot knew that the language of sin was declining even then. Yet most of us would assume that the concept of sin was still strong because the churches—like the Church of England—seemed so strong. Looking back, though, it seems that the sense of sin was already beginning to be replaced by an emerging therapeutic culture. Within a growing culture of liberation, people no longer viewed themselves as sinful when they drank too much, took drugs, or engaged in violent or abusive behaviors. Rather, such actions were increasingly viewed as indicators that such individuals were victims of an illness they had little control over.

Sociologist Philip Rieff warned in his now-classic book of the 1960s, The Triumph of the Therapeutic, that “psychological man was beginning to replace Christian man” as the dominant character type in our society. Unlike traditional Christianity, which made moral demands on believers, the secular world of “psychological man” rejects both the idea of sin and the need for salvation.” The transformation is now complete in the Church of England.

Satan has been called an “evil genius” because he has been able to convince so many that he does not exist. In his satirical Screwtape Letters, C.S. Lewis creates a senior demon named Screwtape who is instructing Wormwood, his young protege, on how best to capture a soul for hell. He tells him that the most effective thing he can do to bring souls to hell is to convince people that Satan does not even exist. “The fact that devils are predominantly comic figures in the modern imagination will help you. If any faint suspicion of your existence begins to arise in his mind, suggest to him a picture of something in red tights, and persuade him that since he cannot believe in that, he therefore cannot believe in you.”

Unlike the Church of England, which is helping people move away from thoughts of the devil, Pope Francis has spoken often of Satan as the “prince of this world,” and the “father of lies.” He cautioned in his book On Heaven and Earth that, “Satan’s fruits are destruction, division, hatred and calumny.” In response, the faithful are beginning to flock to a shepherd that reminds them that it is the “work of the devil” to ignore the plight of the poor and to reject the humanity of all persons—including the weakest and least powerful.

One wonders why the Church of England will even bother to perform baptismal ceremonies at all when the real purpose of such a service has been lost. Rituals are important, though, as author, P.D. James writes in her chilling novel Children of Man. Set in a dystopian world in the year 2021 in which the entire human race has become infertile, the author describes a society in which the last child had been born two decades earlier, and where the “new trend” in cities such as London is to hold elaborate christening ceremonies for kittens—replete with flowing white christening dresses and lace bonnets for the feline newborns. In such a society, the clergy is pleased to preside over the ritual because it gives so much joy to the childless “parents” of the kittens.

The Church of England’s revised baptismal ritual will be voted upon next month in Kent at their General Synod. It will likely pass because it has been driven by a powerful division within the clergy, which is determined to demonstrate that the Church of England is a progressive church that no longer needs to recognize the need to renounce Satan in order to live in the freedom of the children of God.



TOPICS: Mainline Protestant; Moral Issues; Theology
KEYWORDS: anglican; baptism; satan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: Salvation

I’m guessing they will substitute with the word “evil” or “sin”?


61 posted on 06/30/2014 2:44:07 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Great detail.


62 posted on 06/30/2014 2:46:25 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Thank you, Salvation.


63 posted on 06/30/2014 2:55:14 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: laplata

AMEN!!!!


64 posted on 06/30/2014 3:04:02 PM PDT by franky8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NYer
“a simplified baptism which omits mention of the devil” is now favored by the clergy who have test-marketed it throughout the United Kingdom.

Faith by test-marketing. Sounds like a winner!

65 posted on 06/30/2014 3:08:09 PM PDT by workerbee (The President of the United States is PUBLIC ENEMY #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piusv; Salvation
I’m guessing they will substitute with the word “evil” or “sin”?

Doubtful. According to those in the "test market", respondents were offended to be addressed as sinners. Perhaps they will substitute "misunderstood" or "misconstrued". Perhaps they will drop it entirely.

66 posted on 06/30/2014 3:26:42 PM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I’m thinking they may do what you offered in the second part — drop it altogether.


67 posted on 06/30/2014 4:25:45 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Gumdrop

Anglicans getting rid reference to satan in baptism is because satan always controls the Anglican Church. They sold their soul to satan when they sold out to the sodomites. Satan is smiling.


68 posted on 06/30/2014 4:34:46 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Of course it started with Henry VIII. He started the Church of England.

Initially prompted by a dispute over the annulment of the marriage of King Henry VIII to Catherine of Aragon, the Church of England separated from the Roman Catholic Church in 1534 and became the established church by an Act of Parliament in the Act of Supremacy, beginning a series of events known as the English Reformation. During the reign of Queen Mary I and King Philip, the church was fully restored under Rome in 1555. The pope’s authority was again explicitly rejected after the accession of Queen Elizabeth I when the Act of Supremacy of 1558 was passed.

So as simplistic as can be said, since it simply a fact, Henry VIII started the Anglican Church of England when it broke from the Church of Rome.

For the next several decades a bloody struggle took place within the Kingdom until Elizabeth put an end to it with the 1558 Elizabethan Settlement, which developed the understanding that the church was to be both Catholic and Reformed:

So He started it. Simple and true!


69 posted on 06/30/2014 6:49:07 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
So what are people going to say in the Anglican Church now when that question is asked?

The Anglicans will change the question.
Priest: Do you renounce racism, sexism, and homophobia?

70 posted on 06/30/2014 7:12:38 PM PDT by omega4412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Read your own selection...the Roman church was reinstated after his death.


71 posted on 06/30/2014 9:08:45 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

So what. He started the Church. The fact that it was suspended doesn’t change the fact that he started it.


72 posted on 06/30/2014 10:20:03 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The best trick Satan ever pulled off was to convince gullible Christians (and Anglicans in particular) that he does not exist. The Church of England has gone over to the Dark Side and their actions prove it.


73 posted on 07/01/2014 12:48:56 AM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gumdrop

Exactly.


74 posted on 07/01/2014 5:42:16 AM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Yes, I forgot it said that.


75 posted on 07/01/2014 5:57:53 AM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: omega4412

lol


76 posted on 07/01/2014 5:59:29 AM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson