Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Salvation

That’s pretty rich. The poor couldn’t read Latin.


4 posted on 06/27/2014 7:48:54 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Obama - The Scandal a Week President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BipolarBob

But they could read Hebrew and Aramaic.


5 posted on 06/27/2014 7:53:54 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: BipolarBob

You also missed a word in your quote:

**There even poor students*

How do you not know that they might have been studying Latin?


6 posted on 06/27/2014 7:55:58 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: BipolarBob; Salvation
It said poor "students." All students of the Medieval period wrote and read, spoke and understood Latin. It was the language of the school. It facilitated a multinational but same-language civilization of readers from Krakow to Cadiz, from Oslo to Palermo.

Thus anyone who could read, could read the Bible.

I'm not against translation, mind you. The first Bile translations into modern European languages were translated by Catholics. But in the days before movable type, a church, school or monastery could only have a few books, so this way the books you had were accessible to all nationalities, because Latin was the only truly widespread language.

It was like English is today.

9 posted on 06/27/2014 8:11:47 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ( Introibo ad altare Dei.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson