Posted on 06/22/2014 5:22:47 AM PDT by amnestynone
In 2012, the average New York Jew looks a little less like Jerry Seinfeld and a little more like Tevye the Milkman.
New York’s Jews are poorer, less educated and more religious than they were 10 years ago, according to a landmark new study of the city’s Jewish population.
They’re also less liberal: More than half of the Jews in New York City live in Orthodox or Russian-speaking homes, both of which lean heavily conservative.
The study, conducted by UJA-Federation of New York, counted 1.5 million Jews in New York City, Long Island and Westchester, up from 1.4 million just 10 years ago. That growth is almost entirely due to a huge surge in New York’s Orthodox population, which rose by more than 100,000 people over the past decade.
Related •N.Y. Jewish Population Grows to 1.5M: Study •U.S. Jewish Population Pegged at 6 Million •'The Era of the So-Called Jewish Vote Is Over' The numbers point to a seismic shift in what it means to be a New York Jew as Manhattan’s Jewish population shrinks and Brooklyn’s explodes, and as people disaffiliate from the more liberal Jewish denominations.
Source: UJA-Federation of New YorkIn the five boroughs of New York City itself, 40% of Jews currently identify as Orthodox.
The fast-shifting figures promise looming changes in how Jewish political power is wielded in New York, and in the relative influence of the city’s long-standing non-Orthodox institutions.
These trends are poised to accelerate. While one-third of New York-area Jews are Orthodox today, six out of 10 Jewish children in the New York area live in Orthodox homes. Hasidic children alone constitute 37% of the area’s Jewish children.
“We have a community that is large, that is growing, that is diverse and that is challenged by poverty, by elements of disengagement, and also strengthened by diversity, by growing areas of Jewish involvement,” said Steven M. Cohen, a leading sociologist of the Jewish community and one of the report’s three authors.
The $1.7 million study is the largest of its kind ever undertaken in the United States, according to its sponsors. Researchers conducted 6,000 telephone interviews with Jewish households, randomly selected using a variety of methods.
(This reporter’s mother sat on a 22-member advisory board that approved the design of the survey in the fall of 2010. She has had no involvement in the study over the past year and a half.)
The survey’s findings pose an array of major challenges to the city’s Jewish establishment. The survey found among New York Jews fast-rising levels of poverty that appear to be unparalleled in recent history. Researchers also found a steep drop in affiliation among non-Orthodox Jews, and low levels of support among Orthodox Jews for the institutions that the non-Orthodox have long dominated. The survey also identified demographic trends that could have consequences for how New York Jews’ political interests are defined.
Less Liberal
Taken together, New York City’s Orthodox and Russian-speaking Jewish communities comprise 56% of the city’s Jewish population.
The newfound dominance of those communities, both of which are more politically conservative than other Jewish groups, could challenge the notion that the New York Jewish vote is a liberal vote — or even a Democratic vote.
“The Russians are not Democrats, and the Hasidim are not necessarily Democrats,” said Hank Sheinkopf, a conservative Democratic political strategist. “When somebody figures out how to put the Russians and the ultra-Orthodox together they’re going to come up with an atomic bomb in Democratic politics in New York State.”
For years the GOP controlled the Senate and rats the Assembly, so they compromised on redistricting, a rat gerrymander could end GOP chances in the Senate, that’s why taking back control in 2010 was so important.
GOP holds many seats that vote rat statewide, at least recently, if a Republican wins statewide he carries those seats.
That shows a big difference between New York and Illinois. There are pockets of GOP voters in NYC, in places like like Staten Island. I can't imagine any of Romney's "best districts" in Illinois were within Chicago city limits. In fact, I'd be surprised if he won a single Chicago ward or senate district. Bush won only 1 ward out of 50 (Ward 41), and that was the "traditional GOP ward" with a Republican alderman and state senator, and he only won it by like 52% or something (I think the GOP state senator got 63% in that ward, so Bush ran behind)
And when it comes to the city vote by religious breakdown, I was arguing with an anti-Catholic freeper who said the protestant vote in Chicago is probably more GOP friendly than the Catholic vote and makes up the bulk of Republican voters in the city. I'd say its the other way around, since most of the protestant majority areas of the city would probably be black neighborhoods (heavily Baptist) and they gave Obama more than 95%+ of the vote. Romney did much better in white Irish Catholic neighborhoods like Mt. Greenwood (ward 23, Romney got 30% of the vote) You can see the totals here:
http://www.chicagoelections.com/wdlevel3.asp?elec_code=19
As for the Jewish vote in Chicago, I don't think there are many Orthodox Jews within Chicago city limits. I'm guessing the "overall" Jewish vote in Chicago went overwhelmingly RAT, but that differs little from the city as a whole.
In local elections, the numbers do compute.
"The Klan terrorized black Americans through murders and public floggings; relief was granted only if individuals promised not to vote for Republican tickets, and violation of this oath was punishable by death," he said. "Since the Klan targeted Republicans in general, it did not limit its violence simply to black Republicans; white Republicans were also included." (emphasis added)
Didn't realize that Romney supposedly lost Staten Island as a whole because of the hurricane, which one would assume kept a lot of middle class homeowners from voting. Romney's popular vote on SI was an amazing 23% less than McCain's four years before. And his statewide vote was about a half million less than McCain's. Aside from the hurricane, Romney's failure to campaign in New York and in next-door NJ, and perhaps shenanigans in vote counting other Democrat cheating, contributed toward his losing the state by an incredible nearly 2 to 1 margin to an Obama candidacy which garnered about a half million votes in NY less than in '08 and several million votes less nationally than in '08.
Weird. First time in American history that a president was re-elected nationally to a second term with a smaller popular vote than for his first term!
Aren’t these the Kossites’ presidential results by IL state legislative districts? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pRqwQbRV5vfiEamXJn8jstiueCnjembRxXJNbtVTjJc/edit#gid=662607154
I don't think you read the article. It is Conservative Republican Orthodox Jews who are about 10% of the population that are breeding like Mosquito's while the libs are in complete demographic meltdown. The Orthodox due to their fertility now make up 40% of the population in NYC where they are mainly located at. The Othodox children are now 75% of the Jewish population in NYC.
And more power to them - But there is a reason why NE Republicans cannot get elected in Dixie, the Heartland, and the West...
“Senate candidate Hillary Clinton got 1,359 votes out of 1,369 cast in New Square, NY, after Bill Clinton pardoned four Hassidic men who were convicted of fraud of over $30 million.”
“Yes, definitely a quid pro quo. In a just world, the Clintons should have been convicted for exchanging pardons for votes. It’s obvious that the Hasidim wouldn’t have voted over 99% HRC if that dirty deal wasn’t made.”
I don’t think anyone pretends that the 2000 vote in New Square was anything other than a quid pro quo (with the local rabbi asking people to vote for Hillary because she got them the pardon). New Square voted 99% Republican in 1998, and would vote 99% Republican in 2002.
Indeed, must have just added IL, wasn’t there last time I looked.
It appears they aren’t finished, unless something is wrong with my browser (possible) I can only see up to district 5
I remember Perica carried 12 wards when he ran against Stroger. He did well enough in the city to win, but not well enough in suburban cook.
They have the p[residential voting data for all 59 state senate districts and all 118 state house districts in IL. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pRqwQbRV5vfiEamXJn8jstiueCnjembRxXJNbtVTjJc/edit#gid=662607154
Here, I posted the results; the formatting will be a little off here, with the Romney vote total, Obama% and Romney% dropping down to the next line, but you should be able to make out the info in case the link isn’t working for you:
SD HD County Obama Romney Total Obama% Romney%
1 1 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 18,371 3,241 21,869 84.01% 14.82%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 434 179 620 70.00% 28.87%
1 Total 18,805 3,420 22,489 83.62% 15.21%
2 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 20,121 3,765 24,422 82.39% 15.42%
2 Total 20,121 3,765 24,422 82.39% 15.42%
1 Total 38,927 7,185 46,910 82.98% 15.32%
2 3 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 19,592 4,451 24,422 80.22% 18.23%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 309 157 474 65.07% 33.14%
3 Total 19,901 4,608 24,896 79.93% 18.51%
4 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 29,142 3,914 34,003 85.70% 11.51%
4 Total 29,142 3,914 34,003 85.70% 11.51%
2 Total 49,043 8,523 58,899 83.27% 14.47%
3 5 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 40,397 6,377 47,242 85.51% 13.50%
5 Total 40,397 6,377 47,242 85.51% 13.50%
6 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 36,776 4,634 41,799 87.98% 11.09%
6 Total 36,776 4,634 41,799 87.98% 11.09%
3 Total 77,173 11,011 89,040 86.67% 12.37%
4 7 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 41,151 9,760 51,402 80.06% 18.99%
7 Total 41,151 9,760 51,402 80.06% 18.99%
8 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 27,623 252 27,919 98.94% 0.90%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 14,092 6,063 20,531 68.64% 29.53%
8 Total 41,715 6,315 48,450 86.10% 13.03%
4 Total 82,866 16,074 99,852 82.99% 16.10%
5 9 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 39,106 5,185 44,778 87.33% 11.58%
9 Total 39,106 5,185 44,778 87.33% 11.58%
10 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 41,998 4,479 47,106 89.16% 9.51%
10 Total 41,998 4,479 47,106 89.16% 9.51%
5 Total 81,103 9,664 91,884 88.27% 10.52%
6 11 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 34,721 13,054 48,982 70.89% 26.65%
11 Total 34,721 13,054 48,982 70.89% 26.65%
12 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 38,722 13,287 53,240 72.73% 24.96%
12 Total 38,722 13,287 53,240 72.73% 24.96%
6 Total 73,443 26,340 102,222 71.85% 25.77%
7 13 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 35,711 6,033 42,861 83.32% 14.08%
13 Total 35,711 6,033 42,861 83.32% 14.08%
14 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 33,724 4,313 39,009 86.45% 11.06%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 1,255 109 1,384 90.68% 7.88%
14 Total 34,979 4,422 40,393 86.60% 10.95%
7 Total 70,689 10,455 83,254 84.91% 12.56%
8 15 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 12,626 6,836 19,812 63.73% 34.50%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 11,732 8,094 20,063 58.47% 40.34%
15 Total 24,357 14,930 39,875 61.08% 37.44%
16 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 11,267 4,879 16,417 68.63% 29.72%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 12,987 6,416 19,630 66.16% 32.68%
16 Total 24,254 11,295 36,047 67.28% 31.33%
8 Total 48,612 26,225 75,923 64.03% 34.54%
9 17 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 32,527 19,431 52,610 61.83% 36.93%
17 Total 32,527 19,431 52,610 61.83% 36.93%
18 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 36,388 17,470 54,701 66.52% 31.94%
18 Total 36,388 17,470 54,701 66.52% 31.94%
9 Total 68,915 36,901 107,311 64.22% 34.39%
10 19 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 21,322 11,335 33,336 63.96% 34.00%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 2,614 1,773 4,464 58.56% 39.72%
19 Total 23,936 13,108 37,800 63.32% 34.68%
20 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 10,512 9,074 19,947 52.70% 45.49%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 11,710 10,155 22,189 52.78% 45.77%
20 Total 22,223 19,229 42,135 52.74% 45.64%
10 Total 46,159 32,337 79,936 57.75% 40.45%
11 21 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 8,659 1,808 10,634 81.43% 17.00%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 7,088 3,300 10,551 67.18% 31.28%
21 Total 15,747 5,108 21,185 74.33% 24.11%
22 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 20,571 7,505 28,455 72.29% 26.38%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 780 436 1,232 63.31% 35.39%
22 Total 21,351 7,941 29,687 71.92% 26.75%
11 Total 37,098 13,049 50,872 72.92% 25.65%
12 23 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 1 0 1 65.37% 32.04%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 18,884 8,381 27,708 68.15% 30.25%
23 Total 18,885 8,382 27,709 68.15% 30.25%
24 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 3,859 324 4,231 91.21% 7.65%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 14,993 5,049 20,391 73.53% 24.76%
24 Total 18,851 5,372 24,622 76.56% 21.82%
12 Total 37,736 13,754 52,331 72.11% 26.28%
13 25 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 40,583 2,556 43,595 93.09% 5.86%
25 Total 40,583 2,556 43,595 93.09% 5.86%
26 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 43,038 6,863 50,283 85.59% 13.65%
26 Total 43,038 6,863 50,283 85.59% 13.65%
13 Total 83,621 9,419 93,879 89.07% 10.03%
14 27 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 36,285 923 37,326 97.21% 2.47%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 10,228 8,992 19,468 52.54% 46.19%
27 Total 46,513 9,915 56,794 81.90% 17.46%
28 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 22,008 116 22,162 99.31% 0.52%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 17,679 9,830 27,819 63.55% 35.34%
28 Total 39,688 9,946 49,980 79.41% 19.90%
14 Total 86,201 19,861 106,774 80.73% 18.60%
15 29 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 5,952 29 5,988 99.39% 0.49%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 31,378 3,875 35,410 88.62% 10.94%
Will (pt.) 5,301 4,121 9,568 55.40% 43.07%
29 Total 42,631 8,026 50,967 83.65% 15.75%
30 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 35,436 6,965 42,749 82.89% 16.29%
30 Total 35,436 6,965 42,749 82.89% 16.29%
15 Total 78,067 14,991 93,716 83.30% 16.00%
16 31 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 30,303 491 30,841 98.25% 1.59%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 9,569 7,632 17,494 54.70% 43.63%
31 Total 39,872 8,122 48,335 82.49% 16.80%
32 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 29,088 1,441 30,628 94.97% 4.70%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 6,181 3,519 9,831 62.87% 35.80%
32 Total 35,270 4,960 40,459 87.17% 12.26%
16 Total 75,141 13,083 88,795 84.62% 14.73%
17 33 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 28,838 1,269 30,205 95.47% 4.20%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 14,692 4,757 19,613 74.91% 24.26%
33 Total 43,530 6,027 49,817 87.38% 12.10%
34 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 25,935 219 26,208 98.96% 0.83%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 10,854 1,616 12,523 86.67% 12.90%
Kankakee (pt.) 3,057 4,819 8,026 38.09% 60.04%
Will (pt.) 2,508 3,304 5,909 42.45% 55.91%
34 Total 42,354 9,957 52,666 80.42% 18.91%
17 Total 85,884 15,984 102,484 83.80% 15.60%
18 35 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 17,553 7,777 25,684 68.34% 30.28%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 12,753 14,648 27,756 45.95% 52.77%
35 Total 30,306 22,425 53,439 56.71% 41.96%
36 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 5,036 1,698 6,783 74.24% 25.03%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 21,440 17,791 39,813 53.85% 44.69%
36 Total 26,476 19,489 46,596 56.82% 41.83%
18 Total 56,782 41,915 100,035 56.76% 41.90%
19 37 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 5,107 7,809 13,058 39.11% 59.80%
Will (pt.) 15,693 23,030 39,310 39.92% 58.58%
37 Total 20,800 30,839 52,368 39.72% 58.89%
38 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 39,211 8,601 48,149 81.44% 17.86%
Will (pt.) 2,111 2,054 4,242 49.76% 48.41%
38 Total 41,322 10,655 52,391 78.87% 20.34%
19 Total 62,121 41,494 104,759 59.30% 39.61%
20 39 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 24,792 4,453 30,066 82.46% 14.81%
39 Total 24,792 4,453 30,066 82.46% 14.81%
40 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 23,917 4,524 29,256 81.75% 15.46%
40 Total 23,917 4,524 29,256 81.75% 15.46%
20 Total 48,710 8,977 59,322 82.11% 15.13%
21 41 DuPage (pt.) 17,600 17,702 35,905 49.02% 49.30%
Will (pt.) 7,160 8,941 16,291 43.95% 54.88%
41 Total 24,761 26,644 52,196 47.44% 51.05%
42 DuPage (pt.) 24,378 28,786 54,097 45.06% 53.21%
42 Total 24,378 28,786 54,097 45.06% 53.21%
21 Total 49,139 55,430 106,293 46.23% 52.15%
22 43 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 3,816 2,229 6,140 62.16% 36.30%
Kane (pt.) 12,375 5,798 18,560 66.68% 31.24%
43 Total 16,192 8,026 24,699 65.55% 32.50%
44 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 20,202 11,691 32,427 62.30% 36.05%
44 Total 20,202 11,691 32,427 62.30% 36.05%
22 Total 36,393 19,718 57,127 63.71% 34.52%
23 45 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 1,662 1,555 3,268 50.87% 47.59%
DuPage (pt.) 20,592 21,678 42,924 47.97% 50.50%
45 Total 22,254 23,233 46,191 48.18% 50.30%
46 DuPage (pt.) 21,517 14,617 36,807 58.46% 39.71%
46 Total 21,517 14,617 36,807 58.46% 39.71%
23 Total 43,771 37,850 82,998 52.74% 45.60%
24 47 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 1,563 2,197 3,798 41.15% 57.84%
DuPage (pt.) 22,150 28,069 50,930 43.49% 55.11%
47 Total 23,713 30,266 54,728 43.33% 55.30%
48 DuPage (pt.) 26,095 26,105 53,170 49.08% 49.10%
48 Total 26,095 26,105 53,170 49.08% 49.10%
24 Total 49,808 56,371 107,898 46.16% 52.24%
25 49 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 1,446 1,212 2,701 53.54% 44.87%
DuPage (pt.) 7,192 6,497 13,893 51.76% 46.77%
Kane (pt.) 12,496 14,585 27,580 45.31% 52.88%
49 Total 21,133 22,294 44,174 47.84% 50.47%
50 Kane (pt.) 12,753 18,657 31,912 39.96% 58.46%
Kendall (pt.) 8,336 8,865 17,484 47.68% 50.71%
50 Total 21,089 27,522 49,396 42.69% 55.72%
25 Total 42,222 49,816 93,570 45.12% 53.24%
26 51 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 123 106 234 52.31% 45.21%
Lake (pt.) 23,682 31,850 56,274 42.08% 56.60%
51 Total 23,804 31,956 56,508 42.13% 56.55%
52 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 2,770 4,720 7,589 36.50% 62.19%
Kane (pt.) 2,139 2,166 4,384 48.80% 49.41%
Lake (pt.) 2,680 3,862 6,641 40.36% 58.15%
McHenry (pt.) 13,620 15,399 29,568 46.06% 52.08%
52 Total 21,210 26,147 48,182 44.02% 54.27%
26 Total 45,014 58,102 104,691 43.00% 55.50%
27 53 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 25,334 24,807 50,890 49.78% 48.75%
53 Total 25,334 24,807 50,890 49.78% 48.75%
54 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 23,191 24,830 48,795 47.53% 50.89%
54 Total 23,191 24,830 48,795 47.53% 50.89%
27 Total 48,525 49,637 99,684 48.68% 49.79%
28 55 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 656 359 1,029 63.78% 34.90%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 22,296 17,517 40,507 55.04% 43.24%
55 Total 22,952 17,876 41,536 55.26% 43.04%
56 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 19,013 14,848 34,403 55.27% 43.16%
DuPage (pt.) 4,367 3,069 7,555 57.80% 40.62%
56 Total 23,380 17,917 41,958 55.72% 42.70%
28 Total 46,333 35,793 83,494 55.49% 42.87%
29 57 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 20,765 14,845 36,055 57.59% 41.17%
Lake (pt.) 1,319 807 2,166 60.90% 37.26%
57 Total 22,084 15,652 38,221 57.78% 40.95%
58 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 2,941 1,510 4,500 65.36% 33.56%
Lake (pt.) 26,185 20,221 46,898 55.83% 43.12%
58 Total 29,126 21,731 51,398 56.67% 42.28%
29 Total 51,210 37,383 89,620 57.14% 41.71%
30 59 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 2,730 1,381 4,169 65.49% 33.12%
Lake (pt.) 21,456 14,741 36,704 58.46% 40.16%
59 Total 24,186 16,122 40,873 59.17% 39.44%
60 Lake (pt.) 22,004 6,784 29,066 75.70% 23.34%
60 Total 22,004 6,784 29,066 75.70% 23.34%
30 Total 46,191 22,906 69,939 66.04% 32.75%
31 61 Lake (pt.) 23,443 21,993 46,108 50.84% 47.70%
61 Total 23,443 21,993 46,108 50.84% 47.70%
62 Lake (pt.) 21,620 17,200 39,534 54.69% 43.51%
62 Total 21,620 17,200 39,534 54.69% 43.51%
31 Total 45,063 39,193 85,641 52.62% 45.76%
32 63 McHenry (pt.) 19,987 23,385 44,260 45.16% 52.83%
63 Total 19,987 23,385 44,260 45.16% 52.83%
64 Lake (pt.) 11,368 12,306 24,079 47.21% 51.11%
McHenry (pt.) 10,473 14,522 25,450 41.15% 57.06%
64 Total 21,841 26,829 49,529 44.10% 54.17%
32 Total 41,828 50,214 93,789 44.60% 53.54%
33 65 Kane (pt.) 20,095 25,573 46,311 43.39% 55.22%
McHenry (pt.) 1,977 2,367 4,401 44.92% 53.78%
65 Total 22,072 27,940 50,712 43.52% 55.10%
66 Kane (pt.) 6,530 6,999 13,747 47.50% 50.91%
McHenry (pt.) 13,740 15,925 30,133 45.60% 52.85%
66 Total 20,269 22,924 43,880 46.19% 52.24%
33 Total 42,342 50,864 94,592 44.76% 53.77%
34 67 Winnebago (pt.) 22,537 9,040 32,146 70.11% 28.12%
67 Total 22,537 9,040 32,146 70.11% 28.12%
68 Winnebago (pt.) 23,616 24,586 49,070 48.13% 50.10%
68 Total 23,616 24,586 49,070 48.13% 50.10%
34 Total 46,153 33,626 81,216 56.83% 41.40%
35 69 Boone (pt.) 8,424 9,611 18,356 45.89% 52.36%
Winnebago (pt.) 12,492 16,843 29,822 41.89% 56.48%
69 Total 20,916 26,454 48,178 43.41% 54.91%
70 Boone (pt.) 1,459 1,485 3,004 48.55% 49.44%
DeKalb (pt.) 16,753 13,794 31,259 53.59% 44.13%
Kane (pt.) 3,399 6,169 9,736 34.92% 63.37%
70 Total 21,611 21,448 43,999 49.12% 48.75%
35 Total 42,527 47,903 92,177 46.14% 51.97%
36 71 Carroll (pt.) 1,461 854 2,351 62.15% 36.34%
Henry (pt.) 2,178 1,757 4,023 54.14% 43.67%
Rock Island (pt.) 10,437 8,441 19,126 54.57% 44.13%
Whiteside (pt.) 14,327 9,835 24,614 58.21% 39.96%
71 Total 28,403 20,887 50,114 56.68% 41.68%
72 Rock Island (pt.) 28,720 16,493 45,881 62.60% 35.95%
72 Total 28,720 16,493 45,881 62.60% 35.95%
36 Total 57,123 37,380 95,995 59.51% 38.94%
37 73 Bureau (pt.) 1,029 1,333 2,402 42.83% 55.51%
Lasalle (pt.) 312 527 859 36.32% 61.35%
Marshall 2,455 3,290 5,848 41.98% 56.26%
Peoria (pt.) 11,715 19,133 31,351 37.37% 61.03%
Stark 1,095 1,528 2,662 41.13% 57.40%
Woodford (pt.) 3,161 6,165 9,493 33.30% 64.94%
73 Total 19,766 31,977 52,615 37.57% 60.78%
74 Bureau (pt.) 3,689 4,630 8,508 43.36% 54.42%
Henry (pt.) 10,154 9,826 20,294 50.03% 48.42%
Knox (pt.) 8,382 7,088 15,754 53.21% 44.99%
Lee (pt.) 716 698 1,438 49.79% 48.57%
Mercer 4,507 3,876 8,532 52.82% 45.43%
74 Total 27,448 26,119 54,526 50.34% 47.90%
37 Total 47,214 58,095 107,141 44.07% 54.22%
38 75 Grundy (pt.) 7,489 9,535 17,387 43.07% 54.84%
Kendall (pt.) 6,035 7,357 13,629 44.28% 53.98%
Lasalle (pt.) 2,654 3,359 6,137 43.24% 54.73%
Will (pt.) 3,903 4,947 9,071 43.03% 54.53%
75 Total 20,082 25,198 46,225 43.44% 54.51%
76 Bureau (pt.) 3,416 2,200 5,720 59.72% 38.47%
Lasalle (pt.) 18,398 16,814 35,899 51.25% 46.84%
Livingston (pt.) 295 389 696 42.45% 55.95%
Putnam 1,559 1,502 3,135 49.73% 47.91%
76 Total 23,669 20,905 45,449 52.08% 46.00%
38 Total 43,750 46,103 91,674 47.72% 50.29%
39 77 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 10,462 4,323 14,962 69.92% 28.89%
DuPage (pt.) 7,092 4,773 12,057 58.82% 39.59%
77 Total 17,554 9,096 27,019 64.97% 33.66%
78 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 14,297 717 15,095 94.71% 4.75%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 25,639 8,254 34,473 74.37% 23.94%
78 Total 39,935 8,971 49,569 80.57% 18.10%
39 Total 57,489 18,067 76,588 75.06% 23.59%
40 79 Grundy (pt.) 1,962 1,808 3,857 50.87% 46.88%
Kankakee (pt.) 18,538 18,317 37,473 49.47% 48.88%
Will (pt.) 806 1,631 2,498 32.27% 65.31%
79 Total 21,306 21,756 43,827 48.61% 49.64%
80 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 21,189 5,435 26,852 78.91% 20.24%
Will (pt.) 9,917 9,948 20,113 49.31% 49.46%
80 Total 31,106 15,383 46,965 66.23% 32.75%
40 Total 52,412 37,140 90,792 57.73% 40.91%
41 81 DuPage (pt.) 26,028 24,969 51,888 50.16% 48.12%
Will (pt.) 867 1,027 1,925 45.06% 53.35%
81 Total 26,895 25,996 53,813 49.98% 48.31%
82 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 8,820 13,093 22,227 39.68% 58.91%
DuPage (pt.) 8,552 10,239 19,000 45.01% 53.89%
Will (pt.) 4,617 7,580 12,362 37.35% 61.32%
82 Total 21,989 30,912 53,590 41.03% 57.68%
41 Total 48,883 56,909 107,402 45.51% 52.99%
42 83 Kane (pt.) 16,957 7,165 24,535 69.12% 29.20%
83 Total 16,957 7,165 24,535 69.12% 29.20%
84 DuPage (pt.) 9,544 6,026 15,837 60.26% 38.05%
Kane (pt.) 3,587 1,223 4,876 73.57% 25.09%
Kendall (pt.) 3,496 2,751 6,333 55.20% 43.44%
Will (pt.) 4,368 3,706 8,166 53.49% 45.39%
84 Total 20,995 13,707 35,212 59.63% 38.93%
42 Total 37,953 20,871 59,746 63.52% 34.93%
43 85 DuPage (pt.) 4,353 2,514 6,970 62.45% 36.07%
Will (pt.) 19,818 10,706 31,011 63.90% 34.52%
85 Total 24,171 13,220 37,981 63.64% 34.81%
86 Will (pt.) 24,958 12,694 38,275 65.21% 33.17%
86 Total 24,958 12,694 38,275 65.21% 33.17%
43 Total 49,128 25,914 76,256 64.43% 33.98%
44 87 Logan 3,978 7,844 12,050 33.01% 65.10%
Menard 2,100 3,948 6,151 34.14% 64.18%
Sangamon (pt.) 9,021 12,287 21,868 41.25% 56.19%
Tazewell (pt.) 2,768 5,328 8,234 33.62% 64.71%
87 Total 17,867 29,407 48,303 36.99% 60.88%
88 McLean (pt.) 11,323 11,495 23,391 48.41% 49.14%
Tazewell (pt.) 8,858 17,674 27,036 32.76% 65.37%
88 Total 20,181 29,169 50,427 40.02% 57.84%
44 Total 38,048 58,576 98,730 38.54% 59.33%
45 89 Carroll (pt.) 2,204 2,701 5,031 43.80% 53.68%
Jo Daviess 5,667 5,534 11,424 49.61% 48.44%
Ogle (pt.) 1,860 2,739 4,704 39.55% 58.23%
Stephenson 10,165 10,512 21,055 48.28% 49.93%
Whiteside (pt.) 506 613 1,154 43.85% 53.12%
Winnebago (pt.) 3,087 4,668 7,929 38.94% 58.88%
89 Total 23,489 26,767 51,296 45.79% 52.18%
90 DeKalb (pt.) 4,454 5,140 9,828 45.32% 52.31%
Lasalle (pt.) 1,708 2,556 4,352 39.26% 58.73%
Lee (pt.) 6,221 7,361 13,857 44.89% 53.12%
Ogle (pt.) 7,654 10,683 18,662 41.01% 57.24%
90 Total 20,037 25,740 46,699 42.91% 55.12%
45 Total 43,527 52,507 97,996 44.42% 53.58%
46 91 Fulton (pt.) 6,567 4,816 11,700 56.13% 41.16%
Peoria (pt.) 2,886 3,646 6,664 43.32% 54.71%
Tazewell (pt.) 12,812 12,333 25,758 49.74% 47.88%
91 Total 22,266 20,795 44,122 50.46% 47.13%
92 Peoria (pt.) 25,608 13,995 40,366 63.44% 34.67%
92 Total 25,608 13,995 40,366 63.44% 34.67%
46 Total 47,874 34,790 84,488 56.66% 41.18%
47 93 Brown 787 1,513 2,364 33.29% 64.00%
Cass 2,053 2,707 4,861 42.23% 55.69%
Fulton (pt.) 1,761 1,816 3,652 48.22% 49.73%
Knox (pt.) 5,069 2,320 7,524 67.37% 30.83%
Mason 2,867 3,265 6,272 45.71% 52.06%
McDonough 5,967 6,147 12,454 47.91% 49.36%
Schuyler 1,727 2,069 3,890 44.40% 53.19%
Warren (pt.) 686 728 1,432 47.89% 50.86%
93 Total 20,917 20,565 42,449 49.27% 48.45%
94 Adams 9,648 20,416 30,606 31.52% 66.71%
Hancock 3,650 5,271 9,110 40.07% 57.86%
Henderson 1,978 1,541 3,567 55.45% 43.20%
Warren (pt.) 3,358 2,890 6,361 52.79% 45.43%
94 Total 18,634 30,118 49,644 37.54% 60.67%
47 Total 39,551 50,683 92,093 42.95% 55.03%
48 95 Christian (pt.) 4,290 7,048 11,581 37.04% 60.86%
Macoupin (pt.) 8,593 9,217 18,349 46.83% 50.23%
Madison (pt.) 1,730 2,400 4,240 40.80% 56.60%
Montgomery 5,058 6,776 12,130 41.70% 55.86%
95 Total 19,671 25,441 46,300 42.49% 54.95%
96 Christian (pt.) 1,204 1,837 3,120 38.60% 58.87%
Macon (pt.) 14,076 9,213 23,693 59.41% 38.88%
Sangamon (pt.) 9,484 5,593 15,350 61.79% 36.44%
96 Total 24,764 16,642 42,162 58.74% 39.47%
48 Total 44,435 42,083 88,462 50.23% 47.57%
49 97 Kendall (pt.) 4,604 5,074 9,839 46.79% 51.57%
Will (pt.) 16,974 18,708 36,216 46.87% 51.66%
97 Total 21,578 23,782 46,055 46.85% 51.64%
98 Will (pt.) 25,228 16,571 42,382 59.53% 39.10%
98 Total 25,228 16,571 42,382 59.53% 39.10%
49 Total 46,806 40,353 88,437 52.93% 45.63%
50 99 Sangamon (pt.) 23,545 32,218 56,876 41.40% 56.65%
99 Total 23,545 32,218 56,876 41.40% 56.65%
100 Calhoun 1,080 1,440 2,576 41.93% 55.90%
Greene 2,023 3,451 5,621 35.99% 61.39%
Jersey (pt.) 3,323 5,558 9,097 36.52% 61.09%
Macoupin (pt.) 871 1,729 2,661 32.73% 64.98%
Madison (pt.) 1,163 1,676 2,926 39.75% 57.27%
Morgan 5,806 7,972 14,096 41.19% 56.56%
Pike 2,278 4,860 7,284 31.27% 66.72%
Sangamon (pt.) 57 128 187 30.71% 68.38%
Scott 910 1,587 2,555 35.62% 62.11%
100 Total 17,511 28,400 47,003 37.26% 60.42%
50 Total 41,056 60,618 103,878 39.52% 58.35%
51 101 Champaign (pt.) 2,649 6,012 8,810 30.07% 68.24%
Dewitt 2,601 4,579 7,344 35.42% 62.35%
Macon (pt.) 8,361 15,285 24,019 34.81% 63.64%
McLean (pt.) 1,704 3,570 5,402 31.53% 66.09%
Piatt 3,090 5,413 8,707 35.49% 62.17%
101 Total 18,405 34,860 54,283 33.91% 64.22%
102 Champaign (pt.) 5,195 9,195 14,691 35.36% 62.59%
Douglas 2,430 5,334 7,896 30.78% 67.55%
Edgar (pt.) 2,362 4,687 7,162 32.98% 65.44%
Macon (pt.) 343 811 1,184 28.99% 68.51%
Moultrie 2,144 3,784 6,057 35.40% 62.47%
Shelby 3,342 6,843 10,395 32.15% 65.83%
Vermilion (pt.) 310 675 1,006 30.80% 67.13%
102 Total 16,126 31,329 48,391 33.32% 64.74%
51 Total 34,531 66,189 102,673 33.63% 64.47%
52 103 Champaign (pt.) 23,805 9,947 35,086 67.85% 28.35%
103 Total 23,805 9,947 35,086 67.85% 28.35%
104 Champaign (pt.) 9,181 10,157 19,746 46.50% 51.44%
Vermilion (pt.) 10,835 12,505 23,749 45.62% 52.65%
104 Total 20,017 22,662 43,495 46.02% 52.10%
52 Total 43,822 32,609 78,581 55.77% 41.50%
53 105 Livingston (pt.) 628 1,904 2,564 24.51% 74.25%
McLean (pt.) 18,856 24,881 44,582 42.30% 55.81%
105 Total 19,485 26,785 47,146 41.33% 56.81%
106 Ford 1,656 4,229 6,006 27.57% 70.41%
Iroquois 3,413 9,120 12,781 26.70% 71.36%
Livingston (pt.) 4,096 7,460 11,773 34.79% 63.36%
Vermilion (pt.) 1,733 3,712 5,554 31.20% 66.84%
Woodford (pt.) 2,411 6,796 9,377 25.71% 72.47%
106 Total 13,309 31,317 45,491 29.26% 68.84%
53 Total 32,794 58,102 92,637 35.40% 62.72%
54 107 Bond 3,020 4,095 7,325 41.23% 55.90%
Clinton (pt.) 494 955 1,468 33.66% 65.08%
Effingham (pt.) 3,083 9,290 12,561 24.55% 73.96%
Fayette 2,853 5,951 8,970 31.81% 66.34%
Marion 6,225 9,248 15,762 39.49% 58.67%
107 Total 15,675 29,539 46,085 34.01% 64.10%
108 Clinton (pt.) 5,102 9,569 14,977 34.06% 63.89%
Madison (pt.) 7,844 13,988 22,380 35.05% 62.50%
St. Clair (pt.) 3,302 6,077 9,575 34.48% 63.46%
Washington (pt.) 1,775 3,759 5,644 31.44% 66.60%
108 Total 18,022 33,393 52,577 34.28% 63.51%
54 Total 33,698 62,932 98,662 34.15% 63.79%
55 109 Clay 1,584 4,190 5,908 26.81% 70.92%
Edwards 754 2,405 3,228 23.36% 74.50%
Effingham (pt.) 778 3,211 4,050 19.20% 79.28%
Jasper 1,436 3,514 5,043 28.48% 69.68%
Lawrence (pt.) 1,122 2,349 3,548 31.61% 66.20%
Richland 2,362 4,756 7,282 32.44% 65.31%
Wabash 1,590 3,478 5,134 30.97% 67.74%
Wayne 1,514 5,988 7,680 19.71% 77.97%
White 2,188 4,731 7,062 30.98% 66.99%
109 Total 13,327 34,622 48,936 27.23% 70.75%
110 Clark 2,591 5,144 7,855 32.99% 65.49%
Coles 9,262 11,631 21,358 43.37% 54.46%
Crawford 2,858 5,585 8,609 33.20% 64.87%
Cumberland 1,641 3,509 5,294 31.00% 66.28%
Edgar (pt.) 203 445 657 30.90% 67.73%
Lawrence (pt.) 889 1,508 2,441 36.44% 61.79%
110 Total 17,444 27,822 46,214 37.75% 60.20%
55 Total 30,772 62,444 95,149 32.34% 65.63%
56 111 Jersey (pt.) 344 481 862 39.96% 55.84%
Madison (pt.) 23,563 21,014 45,734 51.52% 45.95%
111 Total 23,907 21,496 46,596 51.31% 46.13%
112 Madison (pt.) 20,785 20,564 42,279 49.16% 48.64%
St. Clair (pt.) 3,767 3,943 7,862 47.91% 50.15%
112 Total 24,552 24,506 50,141 48.97% 48.87%
56 Total 48,460 46,002 96,738 50.09% 47.55%
57 113 Madison (pt.) 3,837 966 4,898 78.35% 19.73%
St. Clair (pt.) 23,409 17,364 41,609 56.26% 41.73%
113 Total 27,246 18,330 46,507 58.59% 39.41%
114 St. Clair (pt.) 31,029 16,919 48,568 63.89% 34.84%
114 Total 31,029 16,919 48,568 63.89% 34.84%
57 Total 58,275 35,248 95,075 61.29% 37.07%
58 115 Jackson (pt.) 9,575 8,683 18,944 50.54% 45.83%
Jefferson 6,089 9,811 16,320 37.31% 60.12%
Perry (pt.) 1,986 2,810 4,912 40.44% 57.21%
Union (pt.) 2,098 3,198 5,413 38.76% 59.07%
Washington (pt.) 675 1,033 1,761 38.35% 58.67%
115 Total 20,423 25,535 47,350 43.13% 53.93%
116 Monroe 6,215 10,888 17,428 35.66% 62.47%
Perry (pt.) 1,833 2,697 4,637 39.52% 58.15%
Randolph 5,759 8,290 14,392 40.02% 57.60%
St. Clair (pt.) 6,405 5,999 12,644 50.65% 47.44%
116 Total 20,212 27,873 49,101 41.16% 56.77%
58 Total 40,635 53,408 96,451 42.13% 55.37%
59 117 Franklin 7,254 10,267 17,914 40.49% 57.31%
Hamilton (pt.) 424 816 1,276 33.20% 63.91%
Williamson 10,647 17,909 29,134 36.54% 61.47%
117 Total 18,325 28,992 48,324 37.92% 59.99%
118 Alexander 1,965 1,487 3,501 56.13% 42.47%
Gallatin 1,029 1,492 2,570 40.04% 58.05%
Hamilton (pt.) 845 1,750 2,662 31.76% 65.76%
Hardin 742 1,535 2,330 31.85% 65.88%
Jackson (pt.) 3,744 1,181 5,052 74.11% 23.38%
Johnson 1,572 3,963 5,671 27.72% 69.88%
Massac 2,092 4,278 6,492 32.22% 65.90%
Pope 650 1,512 2,221 29.27% 68.08%
Pulaski 1,389 1,564 3,003 46.25% 52.08%
Saline 3,701 6,806 10,720 34.52% 63.49%
Union (pt.) 1,039 1,759 2,869 36.21% 61.32%
118 Total 18,769 27,328 47,091 39.86% 58.03%
59 Total 37,093 56,320 95,415 38.88% 59.03%
Grand Total 3,020,139 2,135,391 5,241,987 57.61% 40.74%
SD HD County Obama Romney Total Obama% Romney%
1 1 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 18,371 3,241 21,869 84.01% 14.82%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 434 179 620 70.00% 28.87%
1 Total 18,805 3,420 22,489 83.62% 15.21%
2 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 20,121 3,765 24,422 82.39% 15.42%
2 Total 20,121 3,765 24,422 82.39% 15.42%
1 Total 38,927 7,185 46,910 82.98% 15.32%
2 3 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 19,592 4,451 24,422 80.22% 18.23%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 309 157 474 65.07% 33.14%
3 Total 19,901 4,608 24,896 79.93% 18.51%
4 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 29,142 3,914 34,003 85.70% 11.51%
4 Total 29,142 3,914 34,003 85.70% 11.51%
2 Total 49,043 8,523 58,899 83.27% 14.47%
3 5 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 40,397 6,377 47,242 85.51% 13.50%
5 Total 40,397 6,377 47,242 85.51% 13.50%
6 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 36,776 4,634 41,799 87.98% 11.09%
6 Total 36,776 4,634 41,799 87.98% 11.09%
3 Total 77,173 11,011 89,040 86.67% 12.37%
4 7 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 41,151 9,760 51,402 80.06% 18.99%
7 Total 41,151 9,760 51,402 80.06% 18.99%
8 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 27,623 252 27,919 98.94% 0.90%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 14,092 6,063 20,531 68.64% 29.53%
8 Total 41,715 6,315 48,450 86.10% 13.03%
4 Total 82,866 16,074 99,852 82.99% 16.10%
5 9 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 39,106 5,185 44,778 87.33% 11.58%
9 Total 39,106 5,185 44,778 87.33% 11.58%
10 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 41,998 4,479 47,106 89.16% 9.51%
10 Total 41,998 4,479 47,106 89.16% 9.51%
5 Total 81,103 9,664 91,884 88.27% 10.52%
6 11 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 34,721 13,054 48,982 70.89% 26.65%
11 Total 34,721 13,054 48,982 70.89% 26.65%
12 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 38,722 13,287 53,240 72.73% 24.96%
12 Total 38,722 13,287 53,240 72.73% 24.96%
6 Total 73,443 26,340 102,222 71.85% 25.77%
7 13 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 35,711 6,033 42,861 83.32% 14.08%
13 Total 35,711 6,033 42,861 83.32% 14.08%
14 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 33,724 4,313 39,009 86.45% 11.06%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 1,255 109 1,384 90.68% 7.88%
14 Total 34,979 4,422 40,393 86.60% 10.95%
7 Total 70,689 10,455 83,254 84.91% 12.56%
8 15 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 12,626 6,836 19,812 63.73% 34.50%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 11,732 8,094 20,063 58.47% 40.34%
15 Total 24,357 14,930 39,875 61.08% 37.44%
16 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 11,267 4,879 16,417 68.63% 29.72%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 12,987 6,416 19,630 66.16% 32.68%
16 Total 24,254 11,295 36,047 67.28% 31.33%
8 Total 48,612 26,225 75,923 64.03% 34.54%
9 17 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 32,527 19,431 52,610 61.83% 36.93%
17 Total 32,527 19,431 52,610 61.83% 36.93%
18 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 36,388 17,470 54,701 66.52% 31.94%
18 Total 36,388 17,470 54,701 66.52% 31.94%
9 Total 68,915 36,901 107,311 64.22% 34.39%
10 19 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 21,322 11,335 33,336 63.96% 34.00%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 2,614 1,773 4,464 58.56% 39.72%
19 Total 23,936 13,108 37,800 63.32% 34.68%
20 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 10,512 9,074 19,947 52.70% 45.49%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 11,710 10,155 22,189 52.78% 45.77%
20 Total 22,223 19,229 42,135 52.74% 45.64%
10 Total 46,159 32,337 79,936 57.75% 40.45%
11 21 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 8,659 1,808 10,634 81.43% 17.00%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 7,088 3,300 10,551 67.18% 31.28%
21 Total 15,747 5,108 21,185 74.33% 24.11%
22 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 20,571 7,505 28,455 72.29% 26.38%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 780 436 1,232 63.31% 35.39%
22 Total 21,351 7,941 29,687 71.92% 26.75%
11 Total 37,098 13,049 50,872 72.92% 25.65%
12 23 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 1 0 1 65.37% 32.04%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 18,884 8,381 27,708 68.15% 30.25%
23 Total 18,885 8,382 27,709 68.15% 30.25%
24 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 3,859 324 4,231 91.21% 7.65%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 14,993 5,049 20,391 73.53% 24.76%
24 Total 18,851 5,372 24,622 76.56% 21.82%
12 Total 37,736 13,754 52,331 72.11% 26.28%
13 25 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 40,583 2,556 43,595 93.09% 5.86%
25 Total 40,583 2,556 43,595 93.09% 5.86%
26 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 43,038 6,863 50,283 85.59% 13.65%
26 Total 43,038 6,863 50,283 85.59% 13.65%
13 Total 83,621 9,419 93,879 89.07% 10.03%
14 27 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 36,285 923 37,326 97.21% 2.47%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 10,228 8,992 19,468 52.54% 46.19%
27 Total 46,513 9,915 56,794 81.90% 17.46%
28 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 22,008 116 22,162 99.31% 0.52%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 17,679 9,830 27,819 63.55% 35.34%
28 Total 39,688 9,946 49,980 79.41% 19.90%
14 Total 86,201 19,861 106,774 80.73% 18.60%
15 29 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 5,952 29 5,988 99.39% 0.49%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 31,378 3,875 35,410 88.62% 10.94%
Will (pt.) 5,301 4,121 9,568 55.40% 43.07%
29 Total 42,631 8,026 50,967 83.65% 15.75%
30 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 35,436 6,965 42,749 82.89% 16.29%
30 Total 35,436 6,965 42,749 82.89% 16.29%
15 Total 78,067 14,991 93,716 83.30% 16.00%
16 31 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 30,303 491 30,841 98.25% 1.59%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 9,569 7,632 17,494 54.70% 43.63%
31 Total 39,872 8,122 48,335 82.49% 16.80%
32 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 29,088 1,441 30,628 94.97% 4.70%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 6,181 3,519 9,831 62.87% 35.80%
32 Total 35,270 4,960 40,459 87.17% 12.26%
16 Total 75,141 13,083 88,795 84.62% 14.73%
17 33 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 28,838 1,269 30,205 95.47% 4.20%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 14,692 4,757 19,613 74.91% 24.26%
33 Total 43,530 6,027 49,817 87.38% 12.10%
34 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 25,935 219 26,208 98.96% 0.83%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 10,854 1,616 12,523 86.67% 12.90%
Kankakee (pt.) 3,057 4,819 8,026 38.09% 60.04%
Will (pt.) 2,508 3,304 5,909 42.45% 55.91%
34 Total 42,354 9,957 52,666 80.42% 18.91%
17 Total 85,884 15,984 102,484 83.80% 15.60%
18 35 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 17,553 7,777 25,684 68.34% 30.28%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 12,753 14,648 27,756 45.95% 52.77%
35 Total 30,306 22,425 53,439 56.71% 41.96%
36 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 5,036 1,698 6,783 74.24% 25.03%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 21,440 17,791 39,813 53.85% 44.69%
36 Total 26,476 19,489 46,596 56.82% 41.83%
18 Total 56,782 41,915 100,035 56.76% 41.90%
19 37 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 5,107 7,809 13,058 39.11% 59.80%
Will (pt.) 15,693 23,030 39,310 39.92% 58.58%
37 Total 20,800 30,839 52,368 39.72% 58.89%
38 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 39,211 8,601 48,149 81.44% 17.86%
Will (pt.) 2,111 2,054 4,242 49.76% 48.41%
38 Total 41,322 10,655 52,391 78.87% 20.34%
19 Total 62,121 41,494 104,759 59.30% 39.61%
20 39 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 24,792 4,453 30,066 82.46% 14.81%
39 Total 24,792 4,453 30,066 82.46% 14.81%
40 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 23,917 4,524 29,256 81.75% 15.46%
40 Total 23,917 4,524 29,256 81.75% 15.46%
20 Total 48,710 8,977 59,322 82.11% 15.13%
21 41 DuPage (pt.) 17,600 17,702 35,905 49.02% 49.30%
Will (pt.) 7,160 8,941 16,291 43.95% 54.88%
41 Total 24,761 26,644 52,196 47.44% 51.05%
42 DuPage (pt.) 24,378 28,786 54,097 45.06% 53.21%
42 Total 24,378 28,786 54,097 45.06% 53.21%
21 Total 49,139 55,430 106,293 46.23% 52.15%
22 43 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 3,816 2,229 6,140 62.16% 36.30%
Kane (pt.) 12,375 5,798 18,560 66.68% 31.24%
43 Total 16,192 8,026 24,699 65.55% 32.50%
44 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 20,202 11,691 32,427 62.30% 36.05%
44 Total 20,202 11,691 32,427 62.30% 36.05%
22 Total 36,393 19,718 57,127 63.71% 34.52%
23 45 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 1,662 1,555 3,268 50.87% 47.59%
DuPage (pt.) 20,592 21,678 42,924 47.97% 50.50%
45 Total 22,254 23,233 46,191 48.18% 50.30%
46 DuPage (pt.) 21,517 14,617 36,807 58.46% 39.71%
46 Total 21,517 14,617 36,807 58.46% 39.71%
23 Total 43,771 37,850 82,998 52.74% 45.60%
24 47 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 1,563 2,197 3,798 41.15% 57.84%
DuPage (pt.) 22,150 28,069 50,930 43.49% 55.11%
47 Total 23,713 30,266 54,728 43.33% 55.30%
48 DuPage (pt.) 26,095 26,105 53,170 49.08% 49.10%
48 Total 26,095 26,105 53,170 49.08% 49.10%
24 Total 49,808 56,371 107,898 46.16% 52.24%
25 49 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 1,446 1,212 2,701 53.54% 44.87%
DuPage (pt.) 7,192 6,497 13,893 51.76% 46.77%
Kane (pt.) 12,496 14,585 27,580 45.31% 52.88%
49 Total 21,133 22,294 44,174 47.84% 50.47%
50 Kane (pt.) 12,753 18,657 31,912 39.96% 58.46%
Kendall (pt.) 8,336 8,865 17,484 47.68% 50.71%
50 Total 21,089 27,522 49,396 42.69% 55.72%
25 Total 42,222 49,816 93,570 45.12% 53.24%
26 51 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 123 106 234 52.31% 45.21%
Lake (pt.) 23,682 31,850 56,274 42.08% 56.60%
51 Total 23,804 31,956 56,508 42.13% 56.55%
52 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 2,770 4,720 7,589 36.50% 62.19%
Kane (pt.) 2,139 2,166 4,384 48.80% 49.41%
Lake (pt.) 2,680 3,862 6,641 40.36% 58.15%
McHenry (pt.) 13,620 15,399 29,568 46.06% 52.08%
52 Total 21,210 26,147 48,182 44.02% 54.27%
26 Total 45,014 58,102 104,691 43.00% 55.50%
27 53 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 25,334 24,807 50,890 49.78% 48.75%
53 Total 25,334 24,807 50,890 49.78% 48.75%
54 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 23,191 24,830 48,795 47.53% 50.89%
54 Total 23,191 24,830 48,795 47.53% 50.89%
27 Total 48,525 49,637 99,684 48.68% 49.79%
28 55 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 656 359 1,029 63.78% 34.90%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 22,296 17,517 40,507 55.04% 43.24%
55 Total 22,952 17,876 41,536 55.26% 43.04%
56 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 19,013 14,848 34,403 55.27% 43.16%
DuPage (pt.) 4,367 3,069 7,555 57.80% 40.62%
56 Total 23,380 17,917 41,958 55.72% 42.70%
28 Total 46,333 35,793 83,494 55.49% 42.87%
29 57 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 20,765 14,845 36,055 57.59% 41.17%
Lake (pt.) 1,319 807 2,166 60.90% 37.26%
57 Total 22,084 15,652 38,221 57.78% 40.95%
58 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 2,941 1,510 4,500 65.36% 33.56%
Lake (pt.) 26,185 20,221 46,898 55.83% 43.12%
58 Total 29,126 21,731 51,398 56.67% 42.28%
29 Total 51,210 37,383 89,620 57.14% 41.71%
30 59 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 2,730 1,381 4,169 65.49% 33.12%
Lake (pt.) 21,456 14,741 36,704 58.46% 40.16%
59 Total 24,186 16,122 40,873 59.17% 39.44%
60 Lake (pt.) 22,004 6,784 29,066 75.70% 23.34%
60 Total 22,004 6,784 29,066 75.70% 23.34%
30 Total 46,191 22,906 69,939 66.04% 32.75%
31 61 Lake (pt.) 23,443 21,993 46,108 50.84% 47.70%
61 Total 23,443 21,993 46,108 50.84% 47.70%
62 Lake (pt.) 21,620 17,200 39,534 54.69% 43.51%
62 Total 21,620 17,200 39,534 54.69% 43.51%
31 Total 45,063 39,193 85,641 52.62% 45.76%
32 63 McHenry (pt.) 19,987 23,385 44,260 45.16% 52.83%
63 Total 19,987 23,385 44,260 45.16% 52.83%
64 Lake (pt.) 11,368 12,306 24,079 47.21% 51.11%
McHenry (pt.) 10,473 14,522 25,450 41.15% 57.06%
64 Total 21,841 26,829 49,529 44.10% 54.17%
32 Total 41,828 50,214 93,789 44.60% 53.54%
33 65 Kane (pt.) 20,095 25,573 46,311 43.39% 55.22%
McHenry (pt.) 1,977 2,367 4,401 44.92% 53.78%
65 Total 22,072 27,940 50,712 43.52% 55.10%
66 Kane (pt.) 6,530 6,999 13,747 47.50% 50.91%
McHenry (pt.) 13,740 15,925 30,133 45.60% 52.85%
66 Total 20,269 22,924 43,880 46.19% 52.24%
33 Total 42,342 50,864 94,592 44.76% 53.77%
34 67 Winnebago (pt.) 22,537 9,040 32,146 70.11% 28.12%
67 Total 22,537 9,040 32,146 70.11% 28.12%
68 Winnebago (pt.) 23,616 24,586 49,070 48.13% 50.10%
68 Total 23,616 24,586 49,070 48.13% 50.10%
34 Total 46,153 33,626 81,216 56.83% 41.40%
35 69 Boone (pt.) 8,424 9,611 18,356 45.89% 52.36%
Winnebago (pt.) 12,492 16,843 29,822 41.89% 56.48%
69 Total 20,916 26,454 48,178 43.41% 54.91%
70 Boone (pt.) 1,459 1,485 3,004 48.55% 49.44%
DeKalb (pt.) 16,753 13,794 31,259 53.59% 44.13%
Kane (pt.) 3,399 6,169 9,736 34.92% 63.37%
70 Total 21,611 21,448 43,999 49.12% 48.75%
35 Total 42,527 47,903 92,177 46.14% 51.97%
36 71 Carroll (pt.) 1,461 854 2,351 62.15% 36.34%
Henry (pt.) 2,178 1,757 4,023 54.14% 43.67%
Rock Island (pt.) 10,437 8,441 19,126 54.57% 44.13%
Whiteside (pt.) 14,327 9,835 24,614 58.21% 39.96%
71 Total 28,403 20,887 50,114 56.68% 41.68%
72 Rock Island (pt.) 28,720 16,493 45,881 62.60% 35.95%
72 Total 28,720 16,493 45,881 62.60% 35.95%
36 Total 57,123 37,380 95,995 59.51% 38.94%
37 73 Bureau (pt.) 1,029 1,333 2,402 42.83% 55.51%
Lasalle (pt.) 312 527 859 36.32% 61.35%
Marshall 2,455 3,290 5,848 41.98% 56.26%
Peoria (pt.) 11,715 19,133 31,351 37.37% 61.03%
Stark 1,095 1,528 2,662 41.13% 57.40%
Woodford (pt.) 3,161 6,165 9,493 33.30% 64.94%
73 Total 19,766 31,977 52,615 37.57% 60.78%
74 Bureau (pt.) 3,689 4,630 8,508 43.36% 54.42%
Henry (pt.) 10,154 9,826 20,294 50.03% 48.42%
Knox (pt.) 8,382 7,088 15,754 53.21% 44.99%
Lee (pt.) 716 698 1,438 49.79% 48.57%
Mercer 4,507 3,876 8,532 52.82% 45.43%
74 Total 27,448 26,119 54,526 50.34% 47.90%
37 Total 47,214 58,095 107,141 44.07% 54.22%
38 75 Grundy (pt.) 7,489 9,535 17,387 43.07% 54.84%
Kendall (pt.) 6,035 7,357 13,629 44.28% 53.98%
Lasalle (pt.) 2,654 3,359 6,137 43.24% 54.73%
Will (pt.) 3,903 4,947 9,071 43.03% 54.53%
75 Total 20,082 25,198 46,225 43.44% 54.51%
76 Bureau (pt.) 3,416 2,200 5,720 59.72% 38.47%
Lasalle (pt.) 18,398 16,814 35,899 51.25% 46.84%
Livingston (pt.) 295 389 696 42.45% 55.95%
Putnam 1,559 1,502 3,135 49.73% 47.91%
76 Total 23,669 20,905 45,449 52.08% 46.00%
38 Total 43,750 46,103 91,674 47.72% 50.29%
39 77 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 10,462 4,323 14,962 69.92% 28.89%
DuPage (pt.) 7,092 4,773 12,057 58.82% 39.59%
77 Total 17,554 9,096 27,019 64.97% 33.66%
78 Cook - Chicago (pt.) 14,297 717 15,095 94.71% 4.75%
Cook - Suburban (pt.) 25,639 8,254 34,473 74.37% 23.94%
78 Total 39,935 8,971 49,569 80.57% 18.10%
39 Total 57,489 18,067 76,588 75.06% 23.59%
40 79 Grundy (pt.) 1,962 1,808 3,857 50.87% 46.88%
Kankakee (pt.) 18,538 18,317 37,473 49.47% 48.88%
Will (pt.) 806 1,631 2,498 32.27% 65.31%
79 Total 21,306 21,756 43,827 48.61% 49.64%
80 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 21,189 5,435 26,852 78.91% 20.24%
Will (pt.) 9,917 9,948 20,113 49.31% 49.46%
80 Total 31,106 15,383 46,965 66.23% 32.75%
40 Total 52,412 37,140 90,792 57.73% 40.91%
41 81 DuPage (pt.) 26,028 24,969 51,888 50.16% 48.12%
Will (pt.) 867 1,027 1,925 45.06% 53.35%
81 Total 26,895 25,996 53,813 49.98% 48.31%
82 Cook - Suburban (pt.) 8,820 13,093 22,227 39.68% 58.91%
DuPage (pt.) 8,552 10,239 19,000 45.01% 53.89%
Will (pt.) 4,617 7,580 12,362 37.35% 61.32%
82 Total 21,989 30,912 53,590 41.03% 57.68%
41 Total 48,883 56,909 107,402 45.51% 52.99%
42 83 Kane (pt.) 16,957 7,165 24,535 69.12% 29.20%
83 Total 16,957 7,165 24,535 69.12% 29.20%
84 DuPage (pt.) 9,544 6,026 15,837 60.26% 38.05%
Kane (pt.) 3,587 1,223 4,876 73.57% 25.09%
Kendall (pt.) 3,496 2,751 6,333 55.20% 43.44%
Will (pt.) 4,368 3,706 8,166 53.49% 45.39%
84 Total 20,995 13,707 35,212 59.63% 38.93%
42 Total 37,953 20,871 59,746 63.52% 34.93%
43 85 DuPage (pt.) 4,353 2,514 6,970 62.45% 36.07%
Will (pt.) 19,818 10,706 31,011 63.90% 34.52%
85 Total 24,171 13,220 37,981 63.64% 34.81%
86 Will (pt.) 24,958 12,694 38,275 65.21% 33.17%
86 Total 24,958 12,694 38,275 65.21% 33.17%
43 Total 49,128 25,914 76,256 64.43% 33.98%
44 87 Logan 3,978 7,844 12,050 33.01% 65.10%
Menard 2,100 3,948 6,151 34.14% 64.18%
Sangamon (pt.) 9,021 12,287 21,868 41.25% 56.19%
Tazewell (pt.) 2,768 5,328 8,234 33.62% 64.71%
87 Total 17,867 29,407 48,303 36.99% 60.88%
88 McLean (pt.) 11,323 11,495 23,391 48.41% 49.14%
Tazewell (pt.) 8,858 17,674 27,036 32.76% 65.37%
88 Total 20,181 29,169 50,427 40.02% 57.84%
44 Total 38,048 58,576 98,730 38.54% 59.33%
45 89 Carroll (pt.) 2,204 2,701 5,031 43.80% 53.68%
Jo Daviess 5,667 5,534 11,424 49.61% 48.44%
Ogle (pt.) 1,860 2,739 4,704 39.55% 58.23%
Stephenson 10,165 10,512 21,055 48.28% 49.93%
Whiteside (pt.) 506 613 1,154 43.85% 53.12%
Winnebago (pt.) 3,087 4,668 7,929 38.94% 58.88%
89 Total 23,489 26,767 51,296 45.79% 52.18%
90 DeKalb (pt.) 4,454 5,140 9,828 45.32% 52.31%
Lasalle (pt.) 1,708 2,556 4,352 39.26% 58.73%
Lee (pt.) 6,221 7,361 13,857 44.89% 53.12%
Ogle (pt.) 7,654 10,683 18,662 41.01% 57.24%
90 Total 20,037 25,740 46,699 42.91% 55.12%
45 Total 43,527 52,507 97,996 44.42% 53.58%
46 91 Fulton (pt.) 6,567 4,816 11,700 56.13% 41.16%
Peoria (pt.) 2,886 3,646 6,664 43.32% 54.71%
Tazewell (pt.) 12,812 12,333 25,758 49.74% 47.88%
91 Total 22,266 20,795 44,122 50.46% 47.13%
92 Peoria (pt.) 25,608 13,995 40,366 63.44% 34.67%
92 Total 25,608 13,995 40,366 63.44% 34.67%
46 Total 47,874 34,790 84,488 56.66% 41.18%
47 93 Brown 787 1,513 2,364 33.29% 64.00%
Cass 2,053 2,707 4,861 42.23% 55.69%
Fulton (pt.) 1,761 1,816 3,652 48.22% 49.73%
Knox (pt.) 5,069 2,320 7,524 67.37% 30.83%
Mason 2,867 3,265 6,272 45.71% 52.06%
McDonough 5,967 6,147 12,454 47.91% 49.36%
Schuyler 1,727 2,069 3,890 44.40% 53.19%
Warren (pt.) 686 728 1,432 47.89% 50.86%
93 Total 20,917 20,565 42,449 49.27% 48.45%
94 Adams 9,648 20,416 30,606 31.52% 66.71%
Hancock 3,650 5,271 9,110 40.07% 57.86%
Henderson 1,978 1,541 3,567 55.45% 43.20%
Warren (pt.) 3,358 2,890 6,361 52.79% 45.43%
94 Total 18,634 30,118 49,644 37.54% 60.67%
47 Total 39,551 50,683 92,093 42.95% 55.03%
48 95 Christian (pt.) 4,290 7,048 11,581 37.04% 60.86%
Macoupin (pt.) 8,593 9,217 18,349 46.83% 50.23%
Madison (pt.) 1,730 2,400 4,240 40.80% 56.60%
Montgomery 5,058 6,776 12,130 41.70% 55.86%
95 Total 19,671 25,441 46,300 42.49% 54.95%
96 Christian (pt.) 1,204 1,837 3,120 38.60% 58.87%
Macon (pt.) 14,076 9,213 23,693 59.41% 38.88%
Sangamon (pt.) 9,484 5,593 15,350 61.79% 36.44%
96 Total 24,764 16,642 42,162 58.74% 39.47%
48 Total 44,435 42,083 88,462 50.23% 47.57%
49 97 Kendall (pt.) 4,604 5,074 9,839 46.79% 51.57%
Will (pt.) 16,974 18,708 36,216 46.87% 51.66%
97 Total 21,578 23,782 46,055 46.85% 51.64%
98 Will (pt.) 25,228 16,571 42,382 59.53% 39.10%
98 Total 25,228 16,571 42,382 59.53% 39.10%
49 Total 46,806 40,353 88,437 52.93% 45.63%
50 99 Sangamon (pt.) 23,545 32,218 56,876 41.40% 56.65%
99 Total 23,545 32,218 56,876 41.40% 56.65%
100 Calhoun 1,080 1,440 2,576 41.93% 55.90%
Greene 2,023 3,451 5,621 35.99% 61.39%
Jersey (pt.) 3,323 5,558 9,097 36.52% 61.09%
Macoupin (pt.) 871 1,729 2,661 32.73% 64.98%
Madison (pt.) 1,163 1,676 2,926 39.75% 57.27%
Morgan 5,806 7,972 14,096 41.19% 56.56%
Pike 2,278 4,860 7,284 31.27% 66.72%
Sangamon (pt.) 57 128 187 30.71% 68.38%
Scott 910 1,587 2,555 35.62% 62.11%
100 Total 17,511 28,400 47,003 37.26% 60.42%
50 Total 41,056 60,618 103,878 39.52% 58.35%
51 101 Champaign (pt.) 2,649 6,012 8,810 30.07% 68.24%
Dewitt 2,601 4,579 7,344 35.42% 62.35%
Macon (pt.) 8,361 15,285 24,019 34.81% 63.64%
McLean (pt.) 1,704 3,570 5,402 31.53% 66.09%
Piatt 3,090 5,413 8,707
35.49% 62.17% 101 Total 18,405 34,860 54,283 33.91% 64.22%
102 Champaign (pt.) 5,195 9,195 14,691 35.36% 62.59%
Douglas 2,430 5,334 7,896 30.78% 67.55%
Edgar (pt.) 2,362 4,687 7,162 32.98% 65.44%
Macon (pt.) 343 811 1,184 28.99% 68.51%
Moultrie 2,144 3,784 6,057 35.40% 62.47%
Shelby 3,342 6,843 10,395 32.15% 65.83%
Vermilion (pt.) 310 675 1,006 30.80% 67.13%
102 Total 16,126 31,329 48,391 33.32% 64.74%
51 Total 34,531 66,189 102,673 33.63% 64.47%
52 103 Champaign (pt.) 23,805 9,947 35,086 67.85% 28.35%
103 Total 23,805 9,947 35,086 67.85% 28.35%
104 Champaign (pt.) 9,181 10,157 19,746 46.50% 51.44%
Vermilion (pt.) 10,835 12,505 23,749 45.62% 52.65%
104 Total 20,017 22,662 43,495 46.02% 52.10%
52 Total 43,822 32,609 78,581 55.77% 41.50%
53 105 Livingston (pt.) 628 1,904 2,564 24.51% 74.25%
McLean (pt.) 18,856 24,881 44,582 42.30% 55.81%
105 Total 19,485 26,785 47,146 41.33% 56.81%
106 Ford 1,656 4,229 6,006 27.57% 70.41%
Iroquois 3,413 9,120 12,781 26.70% 71.36%
Livingston (pt.) 4,096 7,460 11,773 34.79% 63.36%
Vermilion (pt.) 1,733 3,712 5,554 31.20% 66.84%
Woodford (pt.) 2,411 6,796 9,377 25.71% 72.47%
106 Total 13,309 31,317 45,491 29.26% 68.84%
53 Total 32,794 58,102 92,637 35.40% 62.72%
54 107 Bond 3,020 4,095 7,325 41.23% 55.90%
Clinton (pt.) 494 955 1,468 33.66% 65.08%
Effingham (pt.) 3,083 9,290 12,561 24.55% 73.96%
Fayette 2,853 5,951 8,970 31.81% 66.34%
Marion 6,225 9,248 15,762 39.49% 58.67%
107 Total 15,675 29,539 46,085 34.01% 64.10%
108 Clinton (pt.) 5,102 9,569 14,977 34.06% 63.89%
Madison (pt.) 7,844 13,988 22,380 35.05% 62.50%
St. Clair (pt.) 3,302 6,077 9,575 34.48% 63.46%
Washington (pt.) 1,775 3,759 5,644 31.44% 66.60%
108 Total 18,022 33,393 52,577 34.28% 63.51%
54 Total 33,698 62,932 98,662 34.15% 63.79%
55 109 Clay 1,584 4,190 5,908 26.81% 70.92%
Edwards 754 2,405 3,228 23.36% 74.50%
Effingham (pt.) 778 3,211 4,050 19.20% 79.28%
Jasper 1,436 3,514 5,043 28.48% 69.68%
Lawrence (pt.) 1,122 2,349 3,548 31.61% 66.20%
Richland 2,362 4,756 7,282 32.44% 65.31%
Wabash 1,590 3,478 5,134 30.97% 67.74%
Wayne 1,514 5,988 7,680 19.71% 77.97%
White 2,188 4,731 7,062 30.98% 66.99%
109 Total 13,327 34,622 48,936 27.23% 70.75%
110 Clark 2,591 5,144 7,855 32.99% 65.49%
Coles 9,262 11,631 21,358 43.37% 54.46%
Crawford 2,858 5,585 8,609 33.20% 64.87%
Cumberland 1,641 3,509 5,294 31.00% 66.28%
Edgar (pt.) 203 445 657 30.90% 67.73%
Lawrence (pt.) 889 1,508 2,441 36.44% 61.79%
110 Total 17,444 27,822 46,214 37.75% 60.20%
55 Total 30,772 62,444 95,149 32.34% 65.63%
56 111 Jersey (pt.) 344 481 862 39.96% 55.84%
Madison (pt.) 23,563 21,014 45,734 51.52% 45.95%
111 Total 23,907 21,496 46,596 51.31% 46.13%
112 Madison (pt.) 20,785 20,564 42,279 49.16% 48.64%
St. Clair (pt.) 3,767 3,943 7,862 47.91% 50.15%
112 Total 24,552 24,506 50,141 48.97% 48.87%
56 Total 48,460 46,002 96,738 50.09% 47.55%
57 113 Madison (pt.) 3,837 966 4,898 78.35% 19.73%
St. Clair (pt.) 23,409 17,364 41,609 56.26% 41.73%
113 Total 27,246 18,330 46,507 58.59% 39.41%
114 St. Clair (pt.) 31,029 16,919 48,568 63.89% 34.84%
114 Total 31,029 16,919 48,568 63.89% 34.84%
57 Total 58,275 35,248 95,075 61.29% 37.07%
58 115 Jackson (pt.) 9,575 8,683 18,944 50.54% 45.83%
Jefferson 6,089 9,811 16,320 37.31% 60.12%
Perry (pt.) 1,986 2,810 4,912 40.44% 57.21%
Union (pt.) 2,098 3,198 5,413 38.76% 59.07%
Washington (pt.) 675 1,033 1,761 38.35% 58.67%
115 Total 20,423 25,535 47,350 43.13% 53.93%
116 Monroe 6,215 10,888 17,428 35.66% 62.47%
Perry (pt.) 1,833 2,697 4,637 39.52% 58.15%
Randolph 5,759 8,290 14,392 40.02% 57.60%
St. Clair (pt.) 6,405 5,999 12,644 50.65% 47.44%
116 Total 20,212 27,873 49,101 41.16% 56.77%
58 Total 40,635 53,408 96,451 42.13% 55.37%
59 117 Franklin 7,254 10,267 17,914 40.49% 57.31%
Hamilton (pt.) 424 816 1,276 33.20% 63.91%
Williamson 10,647 17,909 29,134 36.54% 61.47%
117 Total 18,325 28,992 48,324 37.92% 59.99%
118 Alexander 1,965 1,487 3,501 56.13% 42.47%
Gallatin 1,029 1,492 2,570 40.04% 58.05%
Hamilton (pt.) 845 1,750 2,662 31.76% 65.76%
Hardin 742 1,535 2,330 31.85% 65.88%
Jackson (pt.) 3,744 1,181 5,052 74.11% 23.38%
Johnson 1,572 3,963 5,671 27.72% 69.88%
Massac 2,092 4,278 6,492 32.22% 65.90%
Pope 650 1,512 2,221 29.27% 68.08%
Pulaski 1,389 1,564 3,003 46.25% 52.08%
Saline 3,701 6,806 10,720 34.52% 63.49%
Union (pt.) 1,039 1,759 2,869 36.21% 61.32%
118 Total 18,769 27,328 47,091 39.86% 58.03%
59 Total 37,093 56,320 95,415 38.88% 59.03%
Grand Total 3,020,139 2,135,391 5,241,987 57.61% 40.74%
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pRqwQbRV5vfiEamXJn8jstiueCnjembRxXJNbtVTjJc/edit#gid=662607154
Now as to their fertility, sure some of'em have a lot of kids, but to keep up with the Latinos, they'll have to revive OT polygamy and go at it night and day.
How's your demographic arithmetic? You live in what's destined to become the northernmost Latin American country in this hemisphere. Unless the orthodox Jews (a) increase their numbers to 50 million, AND (b) ALL vote Republican (twice would be good), they had better aprender español with the rest of us.
“)These good orthodox folks are Personally conservative. They are (or have always tended to be) politically liberal. You see’em becoming more politically conservative? Mazeltov, baby! Show me. “
There are three GOP areas of New York City, Staten Island, Nassasu County and Orthodox areas of Brooklyn. It is the Orthodox areeas that elected Bob Turner. Orthodox areas vote Republican and that is a fact.
Thank you for posting that.
I don’t know why the spreadsheet won’t load properly for me, every other state’s does.
yes
I forgot to mention. Jews voted for Republican majors in 5 straight elections, twice against Jewish Democrats. In 2013, the vote was split. But even then, only White Catholics were more Republican than Jews and only in Manhattan did most Jews vote Democrat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.